Re Candy (2010) COP 18/3/10
The donor appointed two attorneys to act jointly and severally. She then imposed the following restriction: "neither of my attorneys will act without the approval of the other". On the application of the attorneys the court severed the restriction as being inconsistent with a joint and several appointment. [OPG summary - EPA case.]
Summary from OPG website. Title: Re Candy (an order of the Senior Judge made on 18 March 2010). Heading: Severance of restrictions incompatible with a joint and several appointment.
No Bailii link (no transcript)
Summary on OPG section of Justice website†.This is a link to an archived version of the web page (archived on 6/10/14).