R (P) v MHRT East Midlands and North East Region [2002] EWCA Civ 260
Permission to appeal granted on the basis that onus of proof had arguably been placed on the patient; permission to argue that the definition of psychopathic disorder requires the current commission by the patient of either abnormally aggressive conduct or seriously irresponsible conduct.
Related case
See R (P) v MHRT East Midlands and North East Region [2002] EWCA Civ 697.
External link
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: