• Mental Health Law Online
    Mental Health Law Online
  • Menu
  • Main
    • Main page
    • CPD scheme (12 points for £60)
    • Case law
    • Legislation
    • Resources
    • Information
    • Coronavirus resources
    • Help / contact
  • MHA
    • Full text of MHA 1983
    • MHA Codes of Practice
    • Reference Guide
    • All tribunal rules
    • HESC Rules
  • MCA
    • Full text of MCA 2005
    • MCA Codes of Practice
    • 39 Essex Chambers newsletter
  • Forms
    • MHA Statutory Forms
    • MHA Information Leaflets
    • Foreign-language MHA information leaflets
    • DOLS Standard Forms
    • Court of Protection forms
    • Tribunal forms
    • Legal Aid forms
  • Listings
    • Books
    • Jobs
    • Events
    • People (Magic Book)
  • Sign up
    • Email updates
    • Email discussion list
    • New online forum
    • CPD scheme
  • Updates
    • Online updates
    • RSS feeds
    • What links here
    • Related changes
    • Special pages
    • Printable version
    • Permanent link
    • Page information
    • Get shortened URL
    • Page values
    • Talk
    • Contributions
    • Create account
    • Log in


Annual Review 2020 | Paperback £5.99 | Kindle £2.99

Online forum | Latest on forum: Adults Family Care v Paid Care

BIM v MD [2014] EWCOP 39, [2014] MHLO 100

Dispute over who should act as property and affairs deputy.

External link

BAILII

Retrieved from "https://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=BIM_v_MD_(2014)_EWCOP_39,_(2014)_MHLO_100&oldid=30333"
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category:
  • Other capacity cases
  • No summary
  • Transcript
  • 2014 cases
Hidden category:
  • Judgment available on Bailii
  • This page was last edited on 30 October 2016, at 23:43.
  • Copyrights
  • Privacy and cookies
  • Disclaimers
  • Powered by MediaWiki