R v Chowdhury [2011] EWCA Crim 936

Revision as of 17:21, 8 January 2012 by J-bot (talk | contribs) (Robot: Removing from Category:Criminal law)

The judge imposed a restriction order (contrary to the medical recommendations) because of the serious nature of the offence and his concerns about previous non-compliance. The Court of Appeal were willing to quash the restriction order if the appellant made the following undertakings: to surrender his Bangladeshi passport; not to apply for another Bangladeshi passport; to surrender his UK passport; not to apply for another UK passport; not to apply for any other travel documents; and to give irrevocable instructions that such documents are not to be returned to him without the written consent of his treating psychiatrist.

External link

...

Transcript