T v L (2021) EWHC 2147 (Fam): Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 21:07, 24 October 2021

Inherent jurisdiction costs The first and second respondents sought an order that their costs, which exceeded £215,000, would be met in full by K (the vulnerable person who was the subject of the proceedings). The court made no order as to costs, the judge noting that "it is my view that no order for costs is likely to be the appropriate starting point in welfare-oriented proceedings under the inherent jurisdiction concerning a vulnerable adult".

Note

Categorised under "COP costs cases" as it is similar to those cases.

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

COP costs cases🔍
Inherent jurisdiction cases🔍 Older inherent jurisdiction cases can still be found in Category:Other capacity cases

Date: 29 July 2021🔍

Court: High Court (Family Division)🔍

Judge(s):

Cobb🔍

Parties:

Citation number(s):

[2021] EWHC 2147 (Fam)^B

What links here:

No pages link to this page

Published: 30/9/21 13:01

Cached: 2025-10-10 05:52:47

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 |Parties=T, S, L, M, K
 |Sentence=Inherent jurisdiction costs
-|Summary=The respondents sought an order that their costs, which exceeded £215,000, would be met in full by K (the vulnerable person who was the subject of the proceedings). The court made no order as to costs, the judge noting that "it is my view that no order for costs is likely to be the appropriate starting point in welfare-oriented proceedings under the inherent jurisdiction concerning a vulnerable adult".
+|Summary=The first and second respondents sought an order that their costs, which exceeded £215,000, would be met in full by K (the vulnerable person who was the subject of the proceedings). The court made no order as to costs, the judge noting that "it is my view that no order for costs is likely to be the appropriate starting point in welfare-oriented proceedings under the inherent jurisdiction concerning a vulnerable adult".
 |Detail===Note==
 Categorised under "COP costs cases" as it is ''similar'' to those cases.