Stott v Leadec Ltd (2020) UKEAT 263/19: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:54, 8 October 2021

EAT capacity and litigation friend The Employment Appeal Tribunal adjourned for a medical report on litigation capacity and commented on the continuing lack of rules rules containing clearly defined powers in relation to proceedings involving protected parties (as defined in Part 21 of the CPR) in employment tribunals and in the EAT.

Essex search

This case's neutral citation number appears in the following newsletters:

39 Essex Chambers, 'Mental Capacity Report' (issue 107, September 2020)

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

Litigation friend cases🔍

Date: 20 February 2020🔍

Court: Employment Appeal Tribunal🔍

Judge(s):

Naomi Ellenbogen🔍

Parties:

Stott🔍
Leadec Ltd🔍

Citation number(s):

[2020] UKEAT 0263_19_2002

What links here:

No pages link to this page

Published: 29/8/20 17:25

Cached: 2025-10-08 23:56:37

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 |Parties=Stott, Leadec Ltd
 |Sentence=EAT capacity and litigation friend
-|Summary=''The Employment Appeal Tribunal adjourned for a medical report on litigation capacity and commented on the continuing lack of rules rules containing clearly defined powers in relation to proceedings involving protected parties (as defined in Part 21 of the CPR) in employment tribunals and in the EAT.''
+|Summary=The Employment Appeal Tribunal adjourned for a medical report on litigation capacity and commented on the continuing lack of rules rules containing clearly defined powers in relation to proceedings involving protected parties (as defined in Part 21 of the CPR) in employment tribunals and in the EAT.
 |Subject=Litigation friend cases
 |News=Yes
 |RSS pubdate=2020/08/29 05:20:01 PM
 }}