R (C) v SSHD (2002) EWCA Civ 647: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
{{#bailii:[2002] EWCA Civ 647}} | |||
[[Category:Ministry of Justice cases]] | |||
[[Category:Ministry of Justice]] | |||
[[Category:Brief summary]] | [[Category:Brief summary]] | ||
[[Category:Transcript]] | [[Category:Transcript]] | ||
[[Category:2002 cases]] | [[Category:2002 cases]] | ||
Latest revision as of 19:09, 25 April 2021
HO could not exercise discretion to refer case under s71 after MHRT without good reason; evidence lacking at MHRT hearing was not good reason on the facts; following IH (CA) MHRT remains fully seised of case after a D/C/D; decision to refer quashed. (rough summary)
External links
The following categories (in blue boxes) can be clicked to view a list of other pages in the same category: