Stec v UK 65731/01 (2006) ECHR 393: Difference between revisions

(New page: Judgment of Grand Chamber. State benefits, Article 1 of Protocol No 1 & Article 14. ==Related cases== Stec v UK 65731/01 (2006) ECHR 393 - judgment of Grand Chamber * [[Stec ...)
 
m (Text replacement - "\[http:\/\/www\.bailii\.org\/.*\/cases\/(UKSC|ECHR|UKPC|EWCOP|EWFC|UKHL|PBRA)\/(.*)\/(.*)\.html Bailii\]" to "{{#bailii:[$2] $1 $3}}")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:


* [[Stec v UK 65731/01 (2005) ECHR 924]] - admissibility
* [[Stec v UK 65731/01 (2005) ECHR 924]] - admissibility
==Related legislation==
[[Social Security (Hospital In-Patients) Regulations 2005]]


==External link==
==External link==
[http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2006/393.html Bailii] (same transcript also [http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2006/1162.html here])
{{#bailii:[2006] ECHR 393}} (same transcript also [http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2006/1162.html here])


{{Stub}}
{{Stub}}


[[Category:Miscellaneous]]
[[Category:Welfare benefits cases]]
[[Category:ECHR]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2005 cases]]
[[Category:2006 cases]]

Latest revision as of 11:14, 25 April 2021

Judgment of Grand Chamber. State benefits, Article 1 of Protocol No 1 & Article 14.

Related cases

Stec v UK 65731/01 [2006] ECHR 393 - judgment of Grand Chamber

Related legislation

Social Security (Hospital In-Patients) Regulations 2005

External link

BAILII
(same transcript also here)