View source for Re Candy (2010) COP 18/3/10

''The donor appointed two attorneys to act jointly and severally.  She then imposed the following restriction: "neither of my attorneys will act without the approval of the other".  On the application of the attorneys the court severed the restriction as being inconsistent with a joint and several appointment.'' [OPG summary - EPA case.]

==Note==
Summary from OPG website. Title: Re Candy (an order of the Senior Judge made on 18 March 2010). Heading: Severance of restrictions incompatible with a joint and several appointment.

==External link==
{{#bailii:no tran}}

{{epa-summary-link}}

[[Category:EPA cases - severance of restrictions]]

[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:No transcript]]
[[Category:2010 cases]]