The pages below are initially ordered according to the dates on which they were added to the site (most recent first). The order can be changed by clicking on the symbol beside a column heading: click on the symbol beside "Page and summary" for alphabetical order; click beside "Categories" for the order in which the cases were reported. Click on the arrow symbol again to reverse the order. Click on a page name to view the relevant page.

Page and summary	Date added to site	Categories
R (Tagoe-Thompson) v The Hospital Managers of the Park Royal Centre (2002) EWHC 2803 (Admin) — Panel of three hospital managers must be unanimous in order to discharge patient.	2011-04-10	2002 cases, Brief summary, Hospital managers hearings, Transcript
R (GC) v Managers of the Kingswood Centre of Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (2008) EWHC x (Admin) (CO/7784/2008) — The patient's compulsion to pick up litter, even if that litter was in the road, amounted to seriously irresponsible conduct in the context of the definition of mental impairment; the patient was likely to act in a dangerous manner so the hospital managers were right not to discharge.	2009-07-20	2008 cases, Brief summary, Hospital managers hearings, No transcript
R (Tagoe-Thompson) v The Hospital Managers of the Park Royal Centre (2003) EWCA Civ 330 — Panel of three hospital managers must be unanimous in order to discharge patient.	2006-04-16	2003 cases, Detailed summary, Hospital managers hearings, Transcript
R (Huzzey) v Riverside MH Trust (1998) EWHC Admin 465 — Managers must consider dangerousness criterion when reviewing detention after RMO's barring order, and in almost all circumstances discharge if not satisfied of that criterion.	2006-04-15	Detailed summary, Hospital managers hearings, Other NR cases, Transcript
R (O) v West London MH NHS Trust (2005) EWHC 604 (Admin) — Hospital managers are under a common law duty to provide both oral and written reasons at the time of the decison; the decision is legally defective if the reasons are inadequate; this defect cannot be cured by later evidence giving a proper explanation of the reasons; the supplementary evidence was more than mere elucidation so was not accepted.	2006-04-13	Detailed summary, Hospital managers hearings, Transcript
R (SR) v Huntercombe Maidenhead Hospital (2005) EWHC 2361 (Admin) — Usually the managers should discharge if they disagree with the RMO's barring report, but there can be exceptions; they have an unfettered discretion.	2006-04-12	Brief summary, Hospital managers hearings, Other NR cases, Transcript