View source for Re ZK (No 2) (2021) EWCOP 61

{{Case
|Date=2021/11/12
|NCN=[2021] EWCOP 61
|Essex issue=118
|Essex page=14
|Court=Court of Protection
|Judges=Simon Burrows
|Parties=A Local Authority, ZK, SB
|Judicial history first case=Re ZK (No 1) (2021) EWCOP 12
|Sentence=Capacity in various areas
|Summary=(1) In relation to residence, the judge noted: "ZK is having to learn that he can choose, as well as how to choose. If and when he develops that 'skill', he will almost certainly have capacity to make the decision." (2) The jointly-instructed expert had concluded that ZK had capacity to make decisions about contact with members of his family, but not others; the judge disagreed and, having decided that it would be unnecessary and disproportionate to direct further questions or to list a further hearing, declared that ZK lacked capacity in relation to contact with anyone. (3) The family asked for the residence decision to be revisited, but the judge decided that in the context of this litigation, its prolonged nature (it had begun over four years ago in relation to forced marriage concerns and continued in the COP), and the cost it must have had on all those concerned, it was not appropriate, necessary or proportionate to prolong matters further.
|Subject=Other capacity cases
|News=Yes
|RSS pubdate=2021/11/21 10:06:58 PM
}}