View source for Re X (Deprivation of Liberty) (No 2) (2014) EWCOP 37, (2014) MHLO 98

"I need now to supplement and elaborate what I said in my previous judgment in relation to Questions (7), (9) and (16). For ease of reference I set out those questions again: '(7) Does P need to be joined to any application to the court seeking authorisation of a deprivation of liberty in order to meet the requirements of Article 5(1) ECHR or Article 6 or both? (9) If so, should there be a requirement that P … must have a litigation friend (whether by reference to the requirements of Article 5 ECHR and/or by reference to the requirements of Article 6 ECHR)? (16) If P or the detained resident requires a litigation friend, then: (a) Can a litigation friend who does not otherwise have the right to conduct litigation or provide advocacy services provide those services, in other words without instructing legal representatives, by virtue of their acting as litigation friend and without being authorised by the court under the Legal Services Act 2007 to do either or both …?' These questions require consideration of a number of issues which I take in order, formulating each of these issues in the form of a question. ..."

==Related judgments==
{{related judgments|Re X (Deprivation of Liberty) (2014) EWCOP 25, (2014) MHLO 86}}
==ICLR==
{{ICLR|Re X (Deprivation of Liberty) (No 2) (2014) EWCOP 37, (2014) MHLO 98}}

==External links==
{{#bailii:(2014) EWCOP 37}}

[http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR+Dailies%2FWLRD+2011%2Fwlrd2014-434 ICLR]

[https://courtofprotectionhandbook.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/2014-ewcop-37.doc Transcript on COP Handbook website]

[http://courtofprotectionhandbook.com/2014/10/16/re-x-2-further-amplification-of-judicial-deprivation-of-liberty-process/ Alex Ruck Keene, 'Re X (2): further amplification of judicial deprivation of liberty process' (COP Handbook blog, 16/10/14)]

{{link|https://courtofprotectionhandbook.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/letter-to-court-users-re-x-process.pdf|James Batey, 'Implementation of the Re X procedure' (letter from HMCTS to court users, 6/11/14)|HMCTS letter to court users Re X process.pdf}}

[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2014 cases]]