View source for Re Whitbread (No 2) (Habeas Corpus: Continued Detention) (1999) EWHC Admin 2

''(1) The duty to discharge under [[s72]] following a Tribunal decision to discharge on a future date is subject to [[s29]](4) which provides a further basis for detention during displacement proceedings; (2) The managers' reasons for upholding the RMO's barring certificate were adequate.''

==Related cases==
*[[Re Whitbread (No 1) (Habeas Corpus: Compulsory Admission) (1997) EWCA Civ 1944]]
:*[[Re Whitbread (No 1) (Habeas Corpus: Compulsory Admission) (1997) EWHC Admin 102]]
*[[Re Whitbread (No 2) (Habeas Corpus: Continued Detention) (1999) EWHC Admin 2]]

==MHLR==
{{MHLR|1999|1}}

==Other==
Tuesday, 5th January 1999

Mr David Pannick QC

MR K GLEDHILL (instructed by Anthony Stokoe, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey KT2 6PW) appeared on behalf of the Applicant.

MR R McCARTHY QC (instructed by Bevan Ashford, Bristol BS1 4TT) appeared on behalf of the Respondent.

MR A FRASER-URQUHART (instructed by the Legal Department of the London Borough of Richmond, Twickenham TW1 3B2) appeared on behalf an interested party.

==Citations==
[1999] COD. 370

On Bailii as both [1999] EWHC Admin 2 and [2000] EWHC 833 (Admin)

[1999] MHLR 1

==External links==
This case was on Bailii as [1999] EWHC Admin 2 (with paragraph numbering) and [1999] EWHC Admin 833 (without paragraph numbering)

{{#bailii:[1999] EWHC Admin 2}}

{{#bailii:[1999] EWHC Admin 833}}

[[Category:Displacement]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:1999 cases]]
[[Category:Judgment available offline]]