View source for Re T (A Child) (2021) UKSC 35

{{Case
|Date=2021/07/30
|NCN=[2021] UKSC 35
|ICLR=[2021] WLR(D) 428
|ICLR ID=2018006183
|Essex issue=115
|Essex page=40
|Other citations=[2021] 3 FCR 780, [2021] 2 FLR 1041, [2022] AC 723, [2021] 3 WLR 643, (2021) 24 CCL Rep 339, [2021] 4 All ER 665
|Court=Supreme Court
|Judges=Black, Lloyd-Jones, Arden, Hamblen, Stephens
|Parties=T, T's mother, T's father, Cafcass Cymru, Association of Lawyers for Children, Secretary of State for Education, Welsh Government, Children's Commissioner for England, Commissioner for Children and Young People in Scotland
|Sentence=Inherent jurisdiction and unauthorised placements
|Summary=Where a child or young person meets the s25 [[Children Act 1989]] secure accommodation order criteria but the local authority proposes to place him in an unregulated placement (either because no regulated placement is available or because his needs would be better met elsewhere) the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court may authorise his deprivation of liberty at the unregulated placement. This is despite it being a criminal offence under s11 [[Care Standards Act 2000]] to carry on or manage a children's home without being registered.
|Subject=Deprivation of liberty - children
|News=Yes
|RSS pubdate=2021/09/16 08:01:09 PM
}}