View source for Re RGS (No 3) (2014) EWCOP B12, (2014) MHLO 76

"The primary issue was whether it continued to be in RGS's best interests to reside at X Care Home having regard to the fact that he had been injured there. The two secondary issues concerned contempt of court and reporting restrictions."

==Related judgments==
[[Re RGS (No 3) (2014) EWCOP B12, (2014) MHLO 76]]
*[[Re RGS (No 2) (2013) MHLO 147 (COP)]]
**[[Re RGS (2012) EWHC 4162 (COP), (2012) MHLO 173]]

==External link==
{{#bailii:(2014) EWCOP B12}}

[[Category:Other capacity cases]]
[[Category:No summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2014 cases]]