View source for Re Pattison (2010) COP 11/5/10

''The donor appointed three attorneys, A, B and C, to act jointly and severally. A and B were her daughters. She then imposed the following restriction: "I direct that not less than two of my attorneys shall act whilst there are two alive and capable of acting and that initially those two shall be my two daughters." On the application of the attorneys the court directed severance of the restriction as being incompatible with a joint and several appointment.'' [OPG summary - EPA case.]

==Note==
Summary from OPG website.

'''Title:''' Re Pattison (an order of District Judge Hilder made on 11 May 2010)

'''Heading:''' Severance of restrictions incompatible with a joint and several appointment

==External link==
{{#bailii:no tran}}

{{epa-summary-link}}

[[Category:EPA cases - severance of restrictions]]

[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:No transcript]]
[[Category:2010 cases]]