View source for Re D: A v B (2020) EWCOP 1

{{Case
|Date=2020/01/20
|NCN=[2020] EWCOP 1
|ICLR=[2020] WLR(D) 44
|Essex issue=101
|Essex page=35
|Court=Court of Protection
|Judges=Mostyn
|Parties=A, B, C, D, London Borough of Islington
|Sentence=Court of Protection permission
|Summary=(1) The appropriate threshold for permission under [[MCA 2005 s50]] is the same as that applicable in the field of judicial review: to gain permission the claimant or applicant has to demonstrate a good arguable case. (2) In the current case, the decision to be made was "whether a good arguable case has been shown that it is in [D's] best interests for there to be a full welfare investigation of the current contact arrangements" and the judge's conclusion was: "I cannot say that I am satisfied that the mother has shown a good arguable case that a substantive application would succeed if permission were granted." 
|Detail===Note==
The ICLR case summary says "a good arguable case or a real prospect of success" but really should say "a good arguable case".
|Subject=Other capacity cases
|News=Yes
|RSS pubdate=2020/07/03 09:58:01 AM
}}