View source for R (MM) v SSWP (2013) EWCA Civ 1565, (2013) MHLO 132

''(1) The Court of Appeal upheld the Upper Tribunal's decision that the process for assessing eligibility for Employment Support Allowance (involving the claimant completing a questionnaire and attending a face to face interview) placed mental health patients at a 'substantial disadvantage' (under the [[Equality Act 2010]]) when compared with other claimants. (2) In relation to the proposal that obtaining further medical evidence in such cases would be a 'reasonable adjustment', the UT had adjourned for further evidence, directing the SSWP to investigate its reasonableness: the adjournment was lawful but the directions were quashed.''

==ICLR==
{{ICLR|R (MM) v SSWP (2013) EWCA Civ 1565, (2013) MHLO 132}}

==External links==
{{#bailii:(2013) EWCA Civ 1565}}

[http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?docID=WLRD2013-469 ICLR]

[[Category:Welfare benefits cases]]
[[Category:Brief summary]]
[[Category:Transcript]]
[[Category:2013 cases]]