From Mental Health Law Online
"This case raises novel questions about the court's inherent jurisdiction in relation to vulnerable adults. I have before me a vulnerable young woman who has just turned eighteen and has therefore attained her majority. While she was still a child the court had exercised its inherent parens patriae and wardship jurisdictions to protect her from the risk of an unsuitable arranged marriage. The question is whether I have jurisdiction to continue that protection now she is an adult." [Summary required.]
Related judgments
Re SA; FA v Mr A (2010) EWCA Civ 1128
- Re SA; A Local Authority v MA (2005) EWHC 2942 (Fam)