|
|
R (Munday) v SSJ (2009) EWHC 3638 (Admin)This page was last modified at 16:31 on 7 February 2010. Page credits: Jonathan
From WikiMentalHealthThe MoJ's decision to recall the claimant, although contrary to the RMO's advice, was not Wednesbury unreasonable or otherwise flawed on conventional public law grounds: the disagreement was not on medical grounds but on whether, given the history of arson and recent disengagement, a mere allegation of and arrest for arson was sufficient justification for recall. External linkBailii - No transcript on Bailii at time of writing |