Mental Health Law Online is now six years old - please join the new discussion list



Panteleyenko v Ukraine 11901/02 (2006) ECHR 667

From Mental Health Law Online

Jump to: navigation, search

A search of the applicant's office, and the disclosure of confidential psychiatric information, was not in accordance with domestic law and therefore violated Article 8; the domestic authorities' refusal to pay compensation on the ground that criminal proceedings had been discontinued on "non-exonerating grounds" contravened the presumption of innocence and violated Article 6(2).

External link

Bailii