MHLO Annual Review 2013: Paperback | Kindle

Email updates | Email discussion list | Twitter

Fennell, Letts and Wilson, Mental Health Tribunals (Law Society 2013):
Foreword | Review | Amazon | Law Society bookshop | 20% discount

CPD scheme (12 points for £60)

Hirst v UK (No 2) 74025/01 (2005) ECHR 681

From Mental Health Law Online

Jump to: navigation, search

The blanket restriction on voting, which applies to all convicted prisoners in prison irrespective of the length of their sentence, the nature or gravity of their offence, or their individual circumstances, is unlawful.

See also

Voting rights for detained patients

External link


Related judgments on Bailii (search for 'Hirst', sorted by date)