From Mental Health Law Online
|Page and summary||Date added to site||Categories|
|Re Newman (2012) MHLO 73 (EPA) — The donor made an EPA in which, amongst other defects, he failed to select either of the following alternatives: "with general authority to act on my behalf" or "with authority to do the following on my behalf". The court confirmed that this failure did not invalidate the EPA, because it was an immaterial difference from the prescribed form within paragraph 2(4) of Schedule 4 of the MCA. [OPG summary - EPA case.]||2012-08-16||2012 cases, Brief summary, EPA cases - all, EPA cases - immaterial differences from the prescribed form, Transcript|
This category contains only the following page.