Display title | Wakefield Metropolitan District Council v FH [2021] EWHC 1233 (Fam) |
Default sort key | Wakefield Metropolitan District Council v FH (2021) EWHC 1233 (Fam) |
Page length (in bytes) | 1,140 |
Page ID | 16201 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Counted as a content page | Yes |
Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 13:18, 6 February 2025 |
Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 13:26, 6 February 2025 |
Total number of edits | 3 |
Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 3 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | "In my judgment, FH requires the protection of the court at this stage to ensure that she does not return, at this stage, I emphasise, to the home which she shares with her husband and into his primary care. I am satisfied that the local authority has made out its case for an order which will ensure that FH remains at Dewsbury Hospital until she is fit for discharge, and that upon that stage being reached in her recovery, that she then be transferred to a care home, probably HH Care Home, for the immediate future. I am satisfied that where it is necessary, it is indeed proportionate for modest forms of restraint to be used to ensure that FH is enabled to make that journey and then remain at the care home. |