| Display title | SF v Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust [2023] UKUT 205 (AAC) |
| Default sort key | SF v Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust (2023) UKUT 205 (AAC) |
| Page length (in bytes) | 2,266 |
| Page ID | 15184 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Page image |  |
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 00:35, 24 August 2023 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 11:02, 11 March 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 9 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The First-tier Tribunal erred in law in deciding that "appropriate medical treatment" was available because its decision was based on two misunderstandings: (a) that interventions which had the purpose merely of containing risk of physical harm were capable of amounting to "medical treatment"; and (b) that medical treatment may be "appropriate" even where it is "not tailored to [the patient's] diagnosis", and where treatment that is "essential" is not available. |