| Display title | Kent County Council (11 001 504) [2012] MHLO 101 (LGO) |
| Default sort key | Kent County Council (11 001 504) (2012) MHLO 101 (LGO) |
| Page length (in bytes) | 3,645 |
| Page ID | 7026 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 1 |
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 22:13, 30 September 2012 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 21:33, 10 March 2025 |
| Total number of edits | 9 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 2 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | In her report concerning the elderly woman's residential care payment, the Ombudsman says: 'The Council’s internal guidance said that staff could only use the Council's own homes, or places it had 'pre-purchased', or community hospitals. The requirement to offer service users a genuine choice of placement when they are assessed as needing residential care is enshrined in law. The guidance did not adhere to these principles.' |
