| Display title | Irwin Mitchell Trust Corporation Ltd v KS [2025] EWCOP 7 (T2) |
| Default sort key | Irwin Mitchell Trust Corporation Ltd v KS (2025) EWCOP 7 (T2) |
| Page length (in bytes) | 802 |
| Page ID | 16246 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Counted as a content page | Yes |
| Page image |  |
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 20:59, 23 February 2025 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 10:50, 27 May 2025 |
| Total number of edits | 2 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 1 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 1 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | "This matter concerns a young person under 16 years of age, who has substantial assets in England. Her appointed property and affairs deputy has applied for specific authorities in respect of expenditure from her funds. Her litigation friend contends that the Court of Protection has no jurisdiction to determine the application, and the deputyship appointment should be discharged. The jurisdiction question arises because, as all parties agree, KS is now habitually resident in India." |