| Display title | Hussain v Bank of Scotland PLC [2012] EWCA Civ 264 |
| Default sort key | Hussain v Bank of Scotland PLC (2012) EWCA Civ 264 |
| Page length (in bytes) | 1,183 |
| Page ID | 16034 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Edit | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Move | Allow only users with "editing" permission (infinite) |
| Page creator | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 13:18, 4 December 2024 |
| Latest editor | Jonathan (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 13:26, 4 December 2024 |
| Total number of edits | 3 |
| Total number of distinct authors | 1 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)
This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | The litigation friend continued to act as such even after his mother's death, while lying that she was still alive, during possession proceedings and while obtaining permission to appeal. (1) There ceased to be a protected party when the mother died and so he ceased to be litigation friend. (2) No application under CPR 19.8(1) was made for the appointment of a person to represent the estate of the deceased; he had now obtained a grant of letters of administration but that did not have retrospective effect. (3) The order granting permission to appeal was set aside, and the appeal notice was struck out, because there was a compelling reason to do so under CPR 52.9(2). (4) The original possession order would stand until set aside on an application to the Chancery Division, which may impose conditions on granting such an order, or on an appeal to the Court of Appeal. |