R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2011] UKSC 33

'This appeal concerns the question of whether the Respondent Royal Borough acted unlawfully in seeking to amend the Appellant’s care package by substituting her nighttime carer with provision of incontinence pads or absorbent sheets when the Appellant is not in fact incontinent.' (from Supreme Court press summary)

External link

. Includes link to press summary