RM v St Andrew's Healthcare [2010] UKUT 119 (AAC)

Non-disclosure of covert medication (1) When considering the "interests of justice" limb of rule 14(2), the key test to be applied is whether or not non-disclosure of the document or information would allow the patient to make an effective challenge to his detention. (2) On the facts, without knowing that he was being covertly medicated the patient would be unable effectively to challenge his detention; the non-disclosure decision was set aside and re-made. (3) Non-disclosure orders should not only be drafted in terms of documents, but also should deal, in a precise, clear and exhaustive way, with the information which should not be disclosed.


Full judgment: BAILII


  • Reasons🔍
  • Upper Tribunal decisions🔍

Date: 23/4/10🔍

Court: Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)🔍

Cited by:



Citation number(s):

What links here:

Published: 6/5/10 18:39

Cached: 2024-07-16 04:00:40