Harrow CCG v IPJ [2018] EWCOP 44

Residence and care "The Court is asked to determine where AJ should live and how he should be cared for. The applicant CCG has proposed an extensive package of care at the family home, with (most of) the financial arrangements managed by a third party broker. JA's parents, who are the Second and Third Respondents, do not agree the proposals and seek the dismissal of the application.


Thanks to Will Whitaker of Bindmans (solicitor for AJ) for providing the judgment.


Full judgment: Possible Bailii link (not there when last checked, but it might have appeared since 0700 this morning!)
Download here


Date: 30/4/19🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍



Citation number(s):

  • [2018] EWCOP 44Not on Bailii!

What links here:

Published: 10/5/19 21:18

Cached: 2021-05-15 16:56:08