A Mental Health Trust v ER [2021] EWCOP 32

Anorexia (1) The parties agreed that ER lacked capacity to make decisions about her anorexia or the litigation, and the judge, having explored her doubts in detail, ultimately came to the same view. (2) It was not in ER's best interests to be forced to accept treatment or inpatient admission, given her renal failure and extreme dislike of eating disorder units and psychiatric hospitals. (3) More support in the community, in particular moving to a supported living placement where she could have dialysis and more support and company, would be in her best interests, and the local authority and CCG were joined as parties and directed to give evidence of proposals for extra support.

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: BAILII

Subject(s):

  • Medical treatment cases🔍

Date: 30/4/21🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judge(s):

Parties:

Citation number(s):

What links here:

Published: 21/5/21 10:53

Cached: 2021-06-19 09:47:45