Difference between revisions of "Re A (Medical Treatment: Male Sterilisation) (2000) 1 FLR 549, (2000) 1 FCR 193"

 
Line 7: Line 7:
  
 
[http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/Re_A2000/ Transcript and detailed summary] ([[Media:Re A (Medical Treatment Male Sterilisation) (2000).txt|copy]])  
 
[http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/Re_A2000/ Transcript and detailed summary] ([[Media:Re A (Medical Treatment Male Sterilisation) (2000).txt|copy]])  
 
+
[[Category:Judgment available on MHLO]]
 
[[Category:Best interests]]
 
[[Category:Best interests]]
 
[[Category:Detailed summary]]
 
[[Category:Detailed summary]]
 
[[Category:Transcript]]
 
[[Category:Transcript]]
 
[[Category:2000 cases]]
 
[[Category:2000 cases]]

Latest revision as of 20:56, 22 May 2020

It would not be in the best interests of A, who lacked capacity to make the decision, to be sterilised, while the current level of supervision continued; best interests are not limited to best medical interests but encompass medical, emotional and all other welfare issues.

External link

Possible Bailii link (not there when last checked, but it might have appeared since 0700 this morning!)

Possible Bailii link (not there when last checked, but it might have appeared since 0700 this morning!)

Transcript and detailed summary (copy)