R v Goucher  EWCA Crim 2473
On appeal, the restriction order was quashed: the judge had applied the correct test (whether it was necessary to protect the public from serious harm) but, as confirmed by a psychiatric report prepared for the appeal, he had got the answer wrong. [Summary based on All ER (D) report.]
Before: Hughes LJ, Cranston and Hickinbottom JJ (judgment delivered extempore)
John Lockhurst (assigned by the Registrar of Criminal Appeals) for the defendant.
Henry Hughes (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
R v Groucher (2011) All ER (D) 164 (Oct)
Possible Bailii link (not there when last checked, but it might have appeared since 0700 this morning!)