Page values for "R (VC) v SSHD (2016) EWHC 273 (Admin), (2016) MHLO 7"

"_pageData" values

_creationDate2016-02-17 9:59:28 PM
_modificationDate2019-05-20 12:57:38 PM
_creatorJonathan
_categories2016_cases Cases ICLR_summary Judgment_available_on_Bailii Repatriation_cases
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectR (VC) v SSHD (2016) EWHC 273 (Admin), (2016) MHLO 7

"Cases" values

SentenceImmigration detention
SummaryRepatriation case with mental health background. "There are two strands to the contentions made by the Claimant in this claim, as argued before me: (1) a challenge to the lawfulness of his detention on the basis that it was in breach of (a) the Defendant's policy on detaining the mentally ill which, had it been applied lawfully, would have precluded the Claimant's detention; (b) Hardial Singh principle 3 because from 31 October 2014 there was no realistic prospect of the Claimant's removal within a reasonable timescale; and (c) Hardial Singh principle 2 because the Claimant was detained for an unreasonable length of time. (2) a challenge to the treatment of the Claimant in detention on the basis that it was: (a) in violation of Article 3 ECHR; (b) contrary to the Mental Capacity Act 2005; (c) discriminatory, contrary to the Equality Act 2010; and (d) procedurally unfair."
Detail
SubjectRepatriation cases
Judicial_history
Judicial_history_first_page
Date2016-02-16
JudgesSeys Llewellyn
PartiesVC Secretary of State for the Home Department
CourtHigh Court (Administrative Court)
NCN[2016] EWHC 273 (Admin)
MHLR
ICLR[2016] WLR(D) 90
Essex
Other_citations[2016] WLR 3704 [2016] 1 WLR 3704
Cites
External_links[http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?docID=WLRD2016-090 ICLR]
Judgment