Difference between revisions of "R (EM) v SSWP (2009) EWHC 454 (Admin)"

m (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "")
m (Text replacement - "{{bailii|" to "{{#bailii:")
 
Line 11: Line 11:
 
[[Media:R (EM) v SSWP (2009) EWHC 454 (Admin).doc|Transcript]]
 
[[Media:R (EM) v SSWP (2009) EWHC 454 (Admin).doc|Transcript]]
  
{{bailii|(2009) EWHC 454 (Admin)}}
+
{{#bailii:(2009) EWHC 454 (Admin)}}
  
  

Latest revision as of 23:42, 30 October 2016

The Regulations which deprive of welfare benefits transferred prisoners (s47/49 and s45A patients until they would be entitled to release if in prison) are lawful; this is because there is enough of a relevant difference between them and civil/s37 patients to justify different treatment (i.e. they have been sentenced to a term of imprisonment to which they remain subject); in general, this applies all determinate and indeterminate sentence prisoners, including post-tariff lifers, technical lifers being the only exception because they had not been considered when the Regulations were drawn up and there is not enough of a relevant difference present.

Related judgments

R (D and M) v SSWP [2010] EWCA Civ 18

Related legislation

External link

Transcript

BAILII!