Pankiewicz v Poland 34151/04 [2008] ECHR 148

Revision as of 21:17, 26 May 2015 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Text replacement - "{{stub}} " to "")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

It would be too rigid to expect immediate transfer from prison to psychiatric hospital but, although the delay of 2 months 25 days did not at first glance seem particularly excessive, on balance it was not acceptable and violated Article 5(1); the claimant had been compensated by the domestic court so was not a victim for Article 5(3) purposes; the Article 6 complaint was rejected for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies

External link

Bailii