Page values for "Maitland-Hudson v SRA (2019) EWHC 67 (Admin)"

"_pageData" values

_creationDate2019-02-01 9:02:50 AM
_modificationDate2019-05-20 12:53:40 PM
_creatorJonathan
_categories2019_cases Cases Judgment_available_on_Bailii SRA_decisions
_isRedirectNo
_pageNameOrRedirectMaitland-Hudson v SRA (2019) EWHC 67 (Admin)

"News" values

Which_tableCases
RSS_title
RSS_description
RSS_pubdate2019-02-01

"Cases" values

SentenceDishonest solicitor
Summary"The Appellant appeals against findings of misconduct and dishonesty made against him by ... the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal ... Pursuant to those findings, on 2 May 2018 the Appellant was struck off the Roll of Solicitors and ordered to pay the SRA's costs, including £300,000 by way of interim payment. The Tribunal found the Appellant to have been guilty of misconduct "at the highest level", characterised as "deliberate, calculated and repeated… over a number of years". It was aggravated by the Appellant's dishonesty and attempts to defend his conduct. The appeal is based on grounds of alleged procedural unfairness, specifically that the Appellant, a litigant in person, was substantially impaired in his ability to defend himself, to the extent that he admitted himself to hospital. Despite the fact that consultant psychiatrist experts on both sides found that the Appellant was unable to represent himself, the Tribunal refused to dismiss the proceedings on the basis of "incurable unfairness" or even to stay or adjourn their remainder."
Detail
SubjectSRA decisions
Judicial_history
Judicial_history_first_page
Date2019-01-24
JudgesGreen Carr
PartiesAlexis Maitland-Hudson Solicitors Regulation Authority
CourtHigh Court (Administrative Court)
NCN[2019] EWHC 67 (Admin)
MHLR
ICLR
Essex
Other_citations
Cites
External_links
Judgment