Harrow CCG v IPJ [2018] EWCOP 44

Revision as of 21:18, 10 May 2019 by Jonathan (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Case |Date=2019/04/30 |NCN=[2018] EWCOP 44 |Court=Court of Protection |Judges=Hilder |Parties=Harrow Clinical Commissioning Group, IPJ, IJJ, AJ |Sentence=Residence and care...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Residence and care "The Court is asked to determine where AJ should live and how he should be cared for. The applicant CCG has proposed an extensive package of care at the family home, with (most of) the financial arrangements managed by a third party broker. JA's parents, who are the Second and Third Respondents, do not agree the proposals and seek the dismissal of the application.

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: Possible Bailii link (not there when last checked, but it might have appeared since 0700 this morning!)

Subject(s):

Date: 30/4/19🔍

Court: Court of Protection🔍

Judge(s):

Parties:

Citation number(s):

  • [2018] EWCOP 44Not on Bailii!

What links here:

Published: 10/5/19 21:18

Cached: 2020-04-08 18:33:19