<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;user=Jonathan&amp;feedformat=atom</id>
		<title>Mental Health Law Online - User contributions [en]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;user=Jonathan&amp;feedformat=atom"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Special:Contributions/Jonathan"/>
		<updated>2012-05-18T11:20:24Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.18.0</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates</id>
		<title>Updates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates"/>
				<updated>2012-05-16T20:53:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you have anything which is not yet on the internet (e.g. court results or transcripts) then please send it in (see [[Help|Help page]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping up to date==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Email_updates http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Email.jpg] You can now subscribe to free '''[[Email updates]]''', on an occasional or monthly basis. &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Discussion http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Discussion.png] Join the new [[Discussion|email discussion list]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/t_mini-a.png] Receive updates as soon as they are added by following us on Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline @mhlonline]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Updates&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/RSS.gif] Subscribe to the website's [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Updates&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed RSS update feed]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Kindle_updates http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/E-book_16x16.png]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; Receive monthly updates delivered automatically to your [[Kindle updates|Kindle e-reader]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent updates on website==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bullet_feed title=&amp;quot;Mental Health Law Online Update RSS&amp;quot; desc=&amp;quot;What's new on the site&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*16/05/12 (2): Form CTO12 section 64C(4A) - certificate that community patient has capacity to consent (or if under 16 is competent to consent) to treatment and has done so (Part 4A consent certificate). See [[Mental Health Act 1983 Statutory Forms]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*16/05/12 (1): CQC, 'Changes to consent to treatment for patients subject to a CTO' (May 2012). This page explains the change to the regulations. See [[CQC]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/05/12 (2): Scott Blair, 'A Summary of Mental Health Caselaw' (21/3/12). Plagiarism is the copying of someone else's words or ideas without attribution, intentionally or otherwise. In any place where you reproduce anything from this website, please remember to acknowledge the source and provide a link back to the relevant page. Scott Blair, a Scottish Advocate, immigration judge, MHT for Scotland legal convener, and Glasgow University external examiner, spoke on a paper entitled 'A Summary of Mental Health Caselaw' at a seminar on 21/3/12. In three parts it deals with cases from Scotland, England &amp;amp; Wales, and the ECtHR: ''all 20 case summaries in the second part, and eight in the third part, incorporate case summaries copied from Mental Health Law Online without any attribution'' (see pages 55-60, 62, 65-66, 69, 105-109, and 111). The document ends '© Scott Blair, Advocate' but there is no legal entitlement to claim copyright for material copied from Mental Health Law Online. See [[Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/05/12 (1): Valerie Mays, 'Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland: Case Digest' (December 2011). See [[Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*09/05/12 (1): The tribunal secretariat expect only to deal with urgent work on 10/5/12 as most of its staff will be on strike. If you cannot get through on the usual numbers, it is suggested that you call Karen Early (tribunal manager) on 0116 2497161, or email karen.early1@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk to arrange for a caseworker to ring back. See [http://www.mhla.co.uk/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=654 MHLA website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*08/05/12 (2): Transcript uploaded. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*08/05/12 (1): Transcript uploaded. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (20): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|Re G (2012) EWCA Civ 431, (2012) MHLO 52}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (19): Section 139 case. {{pagesummary|DD v Durham County Council (2012) EWHC 1053 (QB), (2012) MHLO 51}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (18): Text of two Welsh Government updates added: 25/4/12 (Mental Health - Primary Care Referrals and Eligibility to Conduct Primary Care Assessments - Wales - Regulations 2012) and 24/4/12 (Laying of the Code of Practice to Parts 2 and 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010). See [[Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (17): Consultation on a Separate Legal Jurisdiction for Wales (27/3/12 to 19/6/12). The Welsh Government are consulting on making things even more unnecessarily complicated, by creating an entirely separate legal jurisdiction for Wales. See [[Consultations#Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (16): Martha Spurrier, 'The great safety net' (Solicitors Journal, 2/4/12). Reproduced by kind permission. See [[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (15): LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12). The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (14): Steve Doughty, 'Father of two with motor neurone disease wins right to die by blinking his eye after judge's landmark ruling' (Daily Mail, 1/5/12). See [[Settled cases and forthcoming judgments#Re XB (advance decision, Theis J)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (13): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Parkins (2012) EWCA Crim 856, (2012) MHLO 50}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (12): PI quantum case. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (11): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (10): PVS case. {{pagesummary|Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (9): Best interests case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (8): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (7): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (6): Simon Edwards, 'Capacity and tenancies/licences' (39 Essex Street, 19/4/12). See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (5): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 21, May 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP) — Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33 — Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP) — Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47 — Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48 — Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (4): Rosalind English, 'Delay in transferring mental health patient for treatment amounted to &amp;quot;inhumane treatment&amp;quot;' (3/5/12). This article concludes: 'This is a prime example of using Article 3 as a social and economic right, not a basic civil right, and thus extended leaves publicly funded authorities to carry out difficult jobs with threats of litigation looming on all sides. The UK courts recognised this claim for what it was, and dismissed it. Strasbourg should have done the same.' See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (3): Mental Health Cop Blog, 'MS v UK' (4/5/12). This article is in favour of the judgment and makes points in relation to (1) place of safety arguments, (2) accessing psychiatric beds, (3) media coverage, and (4) implications. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (2): ECtHR, 'Prolonged police detention of mentally-ill man without adequate medical care violated his Convention rights' (Press release ref ECHR 195 (2012), 3/5/12). This is the court's summary of the judgment. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (1): Article 3 case. {{pagesummary|MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/bullet_feed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update archive===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[April 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[March 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[February 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Updates|Previous updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Care_Quality_Commission</id>
		<title>Care Quality Commission</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Care_Quality_Commission"/>
				<updated>2012-05-16T20:53:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: /* CQC - Other documents */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The Care Quality Commission was created in October 2008 and became operational on 1/4/09. It is an amalgamation of the following organisations:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Healthcare Commission]] (Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Commission for Social Care Inspection]] (CSCI)&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mental Health Act Commission]] (MHAC)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Health and Social Care Act 2008]] - The legislation which created the Commission&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Consultations]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Statistics]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===CQC===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.cqc.org.uk/ Care Quality Commission website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/*/http://www.cqc.org.uk/ National Archives: CQC website]. Some documents are not available on the current CQC website, but many of these can be located in these archives&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===CQC - Reports on MHA===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:File:CQC MHA report 2010-11.pdf|Care Quality Commission, 'Monitoring the Mental Health Act in 2010/11' (8/12/11)]]. The detailed findings in this report are set out under the following chapter headings: (1) Patients' involvement and protection of their rights; (2) Consent to treatment; (3) Patients' experience of care and treatment; (4) Promoting patient safety; (5) Deaths of detained patients&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:File:CQC MHA report 2009-10.pdf|Care Quality Commission, 'Monitoring the use of the Mental Health Act in 2009/10' (27/10/10)]]. CQC's first report on the MHA&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cqc.org.uk/_db/_documents/MHAC_Biennial_Report_0709_final.pdf Coercion and consent: monitoring the Mental Health Act 2007–2009: The Mental Health Act Commission Thirteenth Biennial Report 2007-2009] - 19/7/09&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===CQC - DOLS===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:File:CQC DOLS 2010-11.pdf|CQC, 'The operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in England, 2010/11' (March 2012)]]. Key findings: '(1) 8,982 applications to deprive a person of their liberty were processed, of which 50 per cent were authorised. (2) Many services have developed good practice on the use of the safeguards, especially in involving people and their families in the decision-making process, but some were confused as to when restraints or restrictions on a person amounted to a deprivation of liberty. (3) Between a third and a quarter of care homes had not provided their staff with training on the safeguards, and in some cases only the manager had received training. (4) Most hospitals had held some training, but the proportion of staff involved ranged between 20-100 per cent.'&lt;br /&gt;
**[[:File:CQC DOLS 2010-11 summary.pdf|CQC, 'Summary: The operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in England, 2010/11' (March 2012)]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[http://thesmallplaces.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/cqcs-second-monitoring-report-on.html Lucy Series, 'CQC's second monitoring report on the deprivation of liberty safeguards' (Small Places blog, 27/3/12)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:File:CQC DOLS report March 2011.pdf|CQC, 'The operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in England 2009/10' (March 2011)]]. The 'Issues Raised' are listed as: (1) the DH should consider developing clear, concise and practical briefings on what may constitute a 'deprivation of liberty' and when the Safeguards should be used; (2) staff should be trained effectively on the types of practice that may lead to deprivation of liberty, and should seek advice from their supervisory body in cases of doubt; (3) the move to regulation under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 will allow a monitoring role which is consistent across health and adult social care; (4) the DH should consider reducing the amount of paperwork required.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:File:CQC Guidance for providers MCA.pdf|CQC, 'Mental Capacity Act: Guidance for providers', October 2010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:File:CQC Guidance for providers MCA DOLS.pdf|CQC, 'Deprivation of liberty safeguards: guidance for providers', October 2010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===CQC - Other documents===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cqc.org.uk/organisations-we-regulate/mental-health-services/mental-health-act-guidance/second-opinion-appoint-0 CQC, 'Changes to consent to treatment for patients subject to a CTO' (May 2012)]. This page explains the change to the regulations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cqc.org.uk/aboutcqc/howwedoit/involvingpeoplewhouseservices/patientsurveys/communitymentalhealthservices.cfm Community mental health services survey 2011 (results published August 2011)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cqc.org.uk/annualreport2009/10.cfm Focused on better care: Annual Report 2009/10] - 27/7/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cqc.org.uk/usingcareservices/mentalhealthact.cfm What to expect if your rights are restricted under the Mental Health Act] - 25/5/10 - Information for patients about about what to expect and how to complain ([http://www.cqc.org.uk//newsandevents/newsstories.cfm?cit_id=36282&amp;amp;FAArea1=customWidgets.content_view_1&amp;amp;usecache=false related press release])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cqc.org.uk/guidanceforprofessionals/mentalhealth/workingwithpeoplewhoserightsarerestricted/statutoryreportingbyserviceproviders.cfm Statutory reporting related to the Mental Health Act 1983] - March 2010 - The page deals with new reporting requirements in relation to detained patients who go AWOL or die (in force on 1/4/10 for NHS service providers and 1/10/10 for independent service providers); it also covers s61 reports.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cqc.org.uk/_db/_documents/20100315_Mental_health_5_year_action_plan_FINAL.pdf Position statement and action plan for mental health 2010-2015] - March 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cqc.org.uk/newsandevents/newsstories.cfm?cit_id=35377&amp;amp;FAArea1=customWidgets.content_view_1&amp;amp;usecache=false A new registration system from April 2010] - 30/9/09 - In the future all health and adult social care providers who provide regulated activities will be required to register with the Care Quality Commission. New registration comes into effect on 1/4/10 for NHS trusts (including PCTs) and 1/10/10 for adult social care and independent healthcare providers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cqc.org.uk/newsandevents/newsstories.cfm?cit_id=35306&amp;amp;FAArea1=customWidgets.content_view_1&amp;amp;usecache=false Results of 2009 survey of mental health acute inpatient services published] - 24/9/09&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cqc.org.uk/newsandevents/newsstories.cfm?cit_id=35229&amp;amp;FAArea1=customWidgets.content_view_1&amp;amp;usecache=false Investigation report into West London Mental Health NHS Trust] - 21/7/09&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cqc.org.uk/newsandevents/newsstories.cfm?cit_id=35240&amp;amp;FAArea1=customWidgets.content_view_1&amp;amp;usecache=false Progress report on Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust] - 21/7/09&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cqc.org.uk//newsandevents/newsstories.cfm?cit_id=35231&amp;amp;FAArea1=customWidgets.content_view_1&amp;amp;usecache=false New mental health report] - 19/7/09 - CQC's press release and detailed response about MHAC 13th report&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cqc.org.uk/media/cqc-inspector-dismissed-gross-misconduct CQC, 'CQC inspector dismissed for gross misconduct' (27/4/12)]. 'A CQC inspector has been dismissed for gross misconduct after an internal investigation revealed that the impartiality of their regulatory judgements had been seriously compromised. This came to light as a result of whistle-blowing information to the CQC. No additional detail can be provided as CQC has now referred this matter to the police.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DH===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_117691 Liberating the NHS: Report of the arms-length bodies review] - 26/7/10 - The proposal for the CQC is: &amp;quot;Retain as quality inspectorate across health and social care, operating a joint licensing regime with Monitor. Host organisation for Healthwatch England. Current responsibility of assessing NHS commissioning moves to the NHS Commissioning Board. May receive functions from other organisations, e.g. HTA and HFEA&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Legislation/Actsandbills/HealthandSocialCareBill/index.htm Health and Social Care Bill]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* [http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Closedconsultations/DH_083625 The future regulation of health and adult social care in England: a consultation on the framework for the registration of health and adult social care providers (closed consultation)] (25/3/08)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* [http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Legislation/Actsandbills/HealthandSocialCareBill/DH_080438 Care Quality Commission] (16/11/07)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:* [http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Responsestoconsultations/DH_078227 The future regulation of health and adult social care in England - response to consultation] (27/11/06)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_132790 Department of Health, 'Performance and Capability Review - Care Quality Commission' (gateway ref 17277, 23/2/12)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2007-08/healthandsocialcare.html Health and Social Care Bill 2007-08] (updated as the Bill progressed through Parliament)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:File:National Preventive Mechanism Annual report 2009-2010.pdf|Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, 'Monitoring places of detention: First annual report of the United Kingdom's National Preventive Mechanism: 1 April 2009 – 31 March 2010' (Cm 8010, February 2011)]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Mental_Health_Act_1983_Statutory_Forms</id>
		<title>Mental Health Act 1983 Statutory Forms</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Mental_Health_Act_1983_Statutory_Forms"/>
				<updated>2012-05-16T20:47:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Since 3/11/08, when most of the changes made by the [[Mental Health Act 2007]] came into force, new statutory forms have had to be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| width=&amp;quot;100%&amp;quot; class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot;|England&lt;br /&gt;
!width=&amp;quot;50%&amp;quot;|Wales&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|In England, forms must comply with the [[Mental Health (Hospital, Guardianship and Treatment) (England) Regulations 2008]]. Note that some errors in the regulations have been corrected by the [[Mental Health (Hospital, Guardianship and Treatment) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2008]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Department of Health's official pink forms, together with the CQC's Word-format treatment forms (T1-6), are published below with permission from the respective organisations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''External link'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:SLAM guidelines for disclosure.pdf|SLAM guidelines for disclosure, 22/10/10]] - This Trust's policy is now (a) to provide copies of section papers on request as soon as reasonably practicable; (b) in connection with hearings, to provide access to records if the RC has not objected within 24 hours; and (c) in other circumstances, to provide access to records under the DPA, urgently if appropriate.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|valign=&amp;quot;top&amp;quot;|In Wales, forms must comply with the [[Mental Health (Hospital, Guardianship, Community Treatment and Consent to Treatment) (Wales) Regulations 2008]]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Welsh Assembly Government have produced forms which are available free of charge.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''External link'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sites3/page.cfm?orgid=816&amp;amp;pid=33958 Welsh forms on &amp;quot;HOWIS&amp;quot; website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
!colspan=2|English forms&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=2|&lt;br /&gt;
'''Admission forms'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form A1 section 2 - application by nearest relative for admission for assessment.pdf|Form A1 section 2 - application by nearest relative for admission for assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form A2 section 2 - application by an approved mental health professional for admission for assessment.pdf|Form A2 section 2 - application by an approved mental health professional for admission for assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form A3 section 2 - joint medical recommendation for admission for assessment.pdf|Form A3 section 2 - joint medical recommendation for admission for assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form A4 section 2 - medical recommendation for admission for assessment.pdf|Form A4 section 2 - medical recommendation for admission for assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form A5 section 3 - application by nearest relative for admission for treatment.pdf|Form A5 section 3 - application by nearest relative for admission for treatment]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form A6 section 3 - application by an approved mental health professional for admission for treatment.pdf|Form A6 section 3 - application by an approved mental health professional for admission for treatment]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form A7 section 3 - joint medical recommendation for admission for treatment.pdf|Form A7 section 3 - joint medical recommendation for admission for treatment]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form A8 section 3 - medical recommendation for admission for treatment.pdf|Form A8 section 3 - medical recommendation for admission for treatment]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form A9 section 4 - emergency application by nearest relative for admission for assessment.pdf|Form A9 section 4 - emergency application by nearest relative for admission for assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form A10 section 4 - emergency application by an approved mental health professional for admission for assessment.pdf|Form A10 section 4 - emergency application by an approved mental health professional for admission for assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form A11 section 4 - medical recommendation for emergency admission for assessment.pdf|Form A11 section 4 - medical recommendation for emergency admission for assessment]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Hospital forms'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form H1 section 5(2) - report on hospital in-patient.pdf|Form H1 section 5(2) - report on hospital in-patient]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form H2 section 5(4) - record of hospital in-patient.pdf|Form H2 section 5(4) - record of hospital in-patient]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form H3 sections 2, 3 and 4 - record of detention in hospital.pdf|Form H3 sections 2, 3 and 4 - record of detention in hospital]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form H4 section 19 - authority for transfer from one hospital to another under different managers.pdf|Form H4 section 19 - authority for transfer from one hospital to another under different managers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form H5 section 20 - renewal of authority for detention.pdf|Form H5 section 20 - renewal of authority for detention]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form H6 section 21B - authority for detention after absence without leave for more than 28 days.pdf|Form H6 section 21B - authority for detention after absence without leave for more than 28 days]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Guardianship forms'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form G1 section 7 - guardianship application by nearest relative.pdf|Form G1 section 7 - guardianship application by nearest relative]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form G2 section 7 - guardianship application by an approved mental health professional.pdf|Form G2 section 7 - guardianship application by an approved mental health professional]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form G3 section 7 - joint medical recommendation for reception into guardianship.pdf|Form G3 section 7 - joint medical recommendation for reception into guardianship]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form G4 section 7 - medical recommendation for reception into guardianship.pdf|Form G4 section 7 - medical recommendation for reception into guardianship]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form G5 section 7 - record of acceptance of guardianship application.pdf|Form G5 section 7 - record of acceptance of guardianship application]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form G6 section 19 - authority for transfer from hospital to guardianship.pdf|Form G6 section 19 - authority for transfer from hospital to guardianship]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form G7 section 19 - authority for transfer of a patient from the guardianship of one guardian to another.pdf|Form G7 section 19 - authority for transfer of a patient from the guardianship of one guardian to another]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form G8 section 19 - authority for transfer from guardianship to hospital.pdf|Form G8 section 19 - authority for transfer from guardianship to hospital]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form G9 section 20 - renewal of authority for guardianship.pdf|Form G9 section 20 - renewal of authority for guardianship]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form G10 section 21B - authority for guardianship after absence without leave for more than 28 days.pdf|Form G10 section 21B - authority for guardianship after absence without leave for more than 28 days]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Miscellaneous forms'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form M1 Part 6 - date of reception of a patient in England.pdf|Form M1 Part 6 - date of reception of a patient in England]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form M2 section 25 - report barring discharge by nearest relative.pdf|Form M2 section 25 - report barring discharge by nearest relative]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Treatment forms'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form T1 section 57 - certificate of consent to treatment and second opinion.pdf|Form T1 section 57 - certificate of consent to treatment and second opinion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form T2 section 58(3)(a) - certificate of consent to treatment.pdf|Form T2 section 58(3)(a) - certificate of consent to treatment]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form T3 section 58(3)(b) - certificate of second opinion.pdf|Form T3 section 58(3)(b) - certificate of second opinion]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form T4 section 58A(3) - certificate of consent to treatment (patients at least 18 years old).pdf|Form T4 section 58A(3) - certificate of consent to treatment (patients at least 18 years old)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form T5 section 58A(4) - certificate of consent to treatment and second opinion (patients under 18).pdf|Form T5 section 58A(4) - certificate of consent to treatment and second opinion (patients under 18)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form T6 section 58A(5) - certificate of second opinion (patients who are not capable of understanding the nature, purpose and likely effects of the treatment).pdf|Form T6 section 58A(5) - certificate of second opinion (patients who are not capable of understanding the nature, purpose and likely effects of the treatment)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Treatment forms - CQC Word documents'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form T1 Mental Health Act 1983.doc|T1]] - Section 57 Certificate of consent to treatment and second opinion&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form T2 Mental Health Act 1983.doc|T2]] - Section 58 - Certificate of consent to treatment &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form T3 Mental Health Act 1983.doc|T3]] - Section 58(3) b) – Certificate of second opinion &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form T4 Mental Health Act 1983.doc|T4]] - Section 58A (3) - Certificate of consent to treatment (patients at least 18 years old)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form T5 Mental Health Act 1983.doc|T5]] - Section 58A (4) – Certificate of consent to treatment and second opinion (patients under 18)&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form T6 Mental Health Act 1983.doc|T6]] - Section 58A (5) - certificate of second opinion (patients who are not capable of understanding the nature, purpose and likely effects of the treatment)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''CTO forms'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form CTO1 section 17A - community treatment order.pdf|Form CTO1 section 17A - community treatment order]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form CTO2 section 17B - variation of conditions of a community treatment order.pdf|Form CTO2 section 17B - variation of conditions of a community treatment order]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form CTO3 section 17E - community treatment order - notice of recall to hospital.pdf|Form CTO3 section 17E - community treatment order - notice of recall to hospital]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form CTO4 section 17E - community treatment order - record of patient's detention in hospital after recall.pdf|Form CTO4 section 17E - community treatment order - record of patient's detention in hospital after recall]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form CTO5 section 17F(4) - revocation of community treatment order.pdf|Form CTO5 section 17F(4) - revocation of community treatment order]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form CTO6 section 17F(2) - authority for transfer of recalled community patient to a hospital under different managers.pdf|Form CTO6 section 17F(2) - authority for transfer of recalled community patient to a hospital under different managers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form CTO7 section 20A - community treatment order - report extending the community treatment period.pdf|Form CTO7 section 20A - community treatment order -  report extending the community treatment period]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form CTO8 section 21B - authority for extension of community treatment period after absence without leave for more than 28 days.pdf|Form CTO8 section 21B - authority for extension of community treatment period after absence without leave for more than 28 days]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form CTO9 Part 6 - community patients transferred to England.pdf|Form CTO9 Part 6 - community patients transferred to England]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form CTO10 section 19A - authority for assignment of responsibility for community patient to hospital under different managers.pdf|Form CTO10 section 19A - authority for assignment of responsibility for community patient to hospital under different managers]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form CTO11 section 64C(4) - certificate of appropriateness of treatment to be given to community patient (Part 4A certificate).pdf|Form CTO11 section 64C(4) - certificate of appropriateness of treatment to be given to community patient (Part 4A certificate)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Form CTO12 Mental Health Act 1983.pdf|Form CTO12 section 64C(4A) - certificate that community patient has capacity to consent (or if under 16 is competent to consent) to treatment and has done so (Part 4A consent certificate)]]&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mental Health Act 1983]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:Form_CTO12_Mental_Health_Act_1983.pdf</id>
		<title>File:Form CTO12 Mental Health Act 1983.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:Form_CTO12_Mental_Health_Act_1983.pdf"/>
				<updated>2012-05-16T20:45:31Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/R_(Demetri)_v_South_West_Thames_MHRT_(1997)_EWHC_Admin_622</id>
		<title>R (Demetri) v South West Thames MHRT (1997) EWHC Admin 622</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/R_(Demetri)_v_South_West_Thames_MHRT_(1997)_EWHC_Admin_622"/>
				<updated>2012-05-13T20:56:33Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Reasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Resources==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/1997/622.html Bailii]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{caselaw-stub}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Reasons]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:No summary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:1997 cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates</id>
		<title>Updates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates"/>
				<updated>2012-05-12T16:59:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you have anything which is not yet on the internet (e.g. court results or transcripts) then please send it in (see [[Help|Help page]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping up to date==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Email_updates http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Email.jpg] You can now subscribe to free '''[[Email updates]]''', on an occasional or monthly basis. &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Discussion http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Discussion.png] Join the new [[Discussion|email discussion list]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/t_mini-a.png] Receive updates as soon as they are added by following us on Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline @mhlonline]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Updates&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/RSS.gif] Subscribe to the website's [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Updates&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed RSS update feed]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Kindle_updates http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/E-book_16x16.png]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; Receive monthly updates delivered automatically to your [[Kindle updates|Kindle e-reader]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent updates on website==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bullet_feed title=&amp;quot;Mental Health Law Online Update RSS&amp;quot; desc=&amp;quot;What's new on the site&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/05/12 (2): Scott Blair, 'A Summary of Mental Health Caselaw' (21/3/12). Plagiarism is the copying of someone else's words or ideas without attribution, intentionally or otherwise. In any place where you reproduce anything from this website, please remember to acknowledge the source and provide a link back to the relevant page. Scott Blair, a Scottish Advocate, immigration judge, MHT for Scotland legal convener, and Glasgow University external examiner, spoke on a paper entitled 'A Summary of Mental Health Caselaw' at a seminar on 21/3/12. In three parts it deals with cases from Scotland, England &amp;amp; Wales, and the ECtHR: ''all 20 case summaries in the second part, and eight in the third part, incorporate case summaries copied from Mental Health Law Online without any attribution'' (see pages 55-60, 62, 65-66, 69, 105-109, and 111). The document ends '© Scott Blair, Advocate' but there is no legal entitlement to claim copyright for material copied from Mental Health Law Online. See [[Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/05/12 (1): Valerie Mays, 'Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland: Case Digest' (December 2011). See [[Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*09/05/12 (1): The tribunal secretariat expect only to deal with urgent work on 10/5/12 as most of its staff will be on strike. If you cannot get through on the usual numbers, it is suggested that you call Karen Early (tribunal manager) on 0116 2497161, or email karen.early1@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk to arrange for a caseworker to ring back. See [http://www.mhla.co.uk/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=654 MHLA website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*08/05/12 (2): Transcript uploaded. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*08/05/12 (1): Transcript uploaded. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (20): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|Re G (2012) EWCA Civ 431, (2012) MHLO 52}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (19): Section 139 case. {{pagesummary|DD v Durham County Council (2012) EWHC 1053 (QB), (2012) MHLO 51}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (18): Text of two Welsh Government updates added: 25/4/12 (Mental Health - Primary Care Referrals and Eligibility to Conduct Primary Care Assessments - Wales - Regulations 2012) and 24/4/12 (Laying of the Code of Practice to Parts 2 and 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010). See [[Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (17): Consultation on a Separate Legal Jurisdiction for Wales (27/3/12 to 19/6/12). The Welsh Government are consulting on making things even more unnecessarily complicated, by creating an entirely separate legal jurisdiction for Wales. See [[Consultations#Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (16): Martha Spurrier, 'The great safety net' (Solicitors Journal, 2/4/12). Reproduced by kind permission. See [[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (15): LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12). The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (14): Steve Doughty, 'Father of two with motor neurone disease wins right to die by blinking his eye after judge's landmark ruling' (Daily Mail, 1/5/12). See [[Settled cases and forthcoming judgments#Re XB (advance decision, Theis J)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (13): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Parkins (2012) EWCA Crim 856, (2012) MHLO 50}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (12): PI quantum case. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (11): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (10): PVS case. {{pagesummary|Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (9): Best interests case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (8): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (7): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (6): Simon Edwards, 'Capacity and tenancies/licences' (39 Essex Street, 19/4/12). See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (5): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 21, May 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP) — Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33 — Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP) — Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47 — Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48 — Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (4): Rosalind English, 'Delay in transferring mental health patient for treatment amounted to &amp;quot;inhumane treatment&amp;quot;' (3/5/12). This article concludes: 'This is a prime example of using Article 3 as a social and economic right, not a basic civil right, and thus extended leaves publicly funded authorities to carry out difficult jobs with threats of litigation looming on all sides. The UK courts recognised this claim for what it was, and dismissed it. Strasbourg should have done the same.' See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (3): Mental Health Cop Blog, 'MS v UK' (4/5/12). This article is in favour of the judgment and makes points in relation to (1) place of safety arguments, (2) accessing psychiatric beds, (3) media coverage, and (4) implications. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (2): ECtHR, 'Prolonged police detention of mentally-ill man without adequate medical care violated his Convention rights' (Press release ref ECHR 195 (2012), 3/5/12). This is the court's summary of the judgment. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (1): Article 3 case. {{pagesummary|MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/bullet_feed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update archive===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[April 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[March 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[February 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Updates|Previous updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates</id>
		<title>Updates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates"/>
				<updated>2012-05-12T16:57:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you have anything which is not yet on the internet (e.g. court results or transcripts) then please send it in (see [[Help|Help page]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping up to date==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Email_updates http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Email.jpg] You can now subscribe to free '''[[Email updates]]''', on an occasional or monthly basis. &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Discussion http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Discussion.png] Join the new [[Discussion|email discussion list]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/t_mini-a.png] Receive updates as soon as they are added by following us on Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline @mhlonline]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Updates&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/RSS.gif] Subscribe to the website's [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Updates&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed RSS update feed]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Kindle_updates http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/E-book_16x16.png]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; Receive monthly updates delivered automatically to your [[Kindle updates|Kindle e-reader]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent updates on website==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bullet_feed title=&amp;quot;Mental Health Law Online Update RSS&amp;quot; desc=&amp;quot;What's new on the site&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/05/12 (2): Scott Blair, 'A Summary of Mental Health Caselaw' (21/3/12). Plagiarism is the copying of someone else's words or ideas without attribution, intentionally or otherwise. In any place where you reproduce anything from this website, please remember to acknowledge the source and provide a link back to the relevant page. Scott Blair, a Scottish Advocate, immigration judge, MHT for Scotland legal convener, and Glasgow University external examiner, spoke on a paper entitled 'A Summary of Mental Health Caselaw' at a seminar on 21/3/12. In three parts it deals with cases from Scotland, England &amp;amp; Wales, and the ECtHR: ''all 20 case summaries in the second part, and eight in the third part, incorporate case summaries copied from Mental Health Law Online without any attribution'' (see pages 55-60, 62, 65-66, 69, 105-109, and 111). The document ends '© Scott Blair, Advocate' but there is no legal entitlement to claim copyright for material copied from Mental Health Law Online. See [[Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/05/12 (1): Valerie Mays, 'Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland: Case Digest' (December 2011). See [[Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*09/05/12 (1): The tribunal secretariat expect only to deal with urgent work on 10/5/12 as most of its staff will be on strike. &amp;lt;rss-desc&amp;gt;If you cannot get through on the usual numbers, it is suggested that you call Karen Early (tribunal manager) on 0116 2497161, or email karen.early1@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk to arrange for a caseworker to ring back. See [http://www.mhla.co.uk/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=654 MHLA website]&amp;lt;/rss-desc&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*08/05/12 (2): Transcript uploaded. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*08/05/12 (1): Transcript uploaded. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (20): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|Re G (2012) EWCA Civ 431, (2012) MHLO 52}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (19): Section 139 case. {{pagesummary|DD v Durham County Council (2012) EWHC 1053 (QB), (2012) MHLO 51}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (18): Text of two Welsh Government updates added: 25/4/12 (Mental Health - Primary Care Referrals and Eligibility to Conduct Primary Care Assessments - Wales - Regulations 2012) and 24/4/12 (Laying of the Code of Practice to Parts 2 and 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010). See [[Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (17): Consultation on a Separate Legal Jurisdiction for Wales (27/3/12 to 19/6/12). The Welsh Government are consulting on making things even more unnecessarily complicated, by creating an entirely separate legal jurisdiction for Wales. See [[Consultations#Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (16): Martha Spurrier, 'The great safety net' (Solicitors Journal, 2/4/12). Reproduced by kind permission. See [[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (15): LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12). The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (14): Steve Doughty, 'Father of two with motor neurone disease wins right to die by blinking his eye after judge's landmark ruling' (Daily Mail, 1/5/12). See [[Settled cases and forthcoming judgments#Re XB (advance decision, Theis J)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (13): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Parkins (2012) EWCA Crim 856, (2012) MHLO 50}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (12): PI quantum case. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (11): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (10): PVS case. {{pagesummary|Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (9): Best interests case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (8): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (7): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (6): Simon Edwards, 'Capacity and tenancies/licences' (39 Essex Street, 19/4/12). See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (5): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 21, May 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP) — Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33 — Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP) — Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47 — Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48 — Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (4): Rosalind English, 'Delay in transferring mental health patient for treatment amounted to &amp;quot;inhumane treatment&amp;quot;' (3/5/12). This article concludes: 'This is a prime example of using Article 3 as a social and economic right, not a basic civil right, and thus extended leaves publicly funded authorities to carry out difficult jobs with threats of litigation looming on all sides. The UK courts recognised this claim for what it was, and dismissed it. Strasbourg should have done the same.' See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (3): Mental Health Cop Blog, 'MS v UK' (4/5/12). This article is in favour of the judgment and makes points in relation to (1) place of safety arguments, (2) accessing psychiatric beds, (3) media coverage, and (4) implications. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (2): ECtHR, 'Prolonged police detention of mentally-ill man without adequate medical care violated his Convention rights' (Press release ref ECHR 195 (2012), 3/5/12). This is the court's summary of the judgment. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (1): Article 3 case. {{pagesummary|MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/bullet_feed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update archive===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[April 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[March 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[February 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Updates|Previous updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:E-book_16x16.png</id>
		<title>File:E-book 16x16.png</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:E-book_16x16.png"/>
				<updated>2012-05-11T20:04:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: uploaded a new version of &amp;amp;quot;File:E-book 16x16.png&amp;amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:Solicitors_Journal_-_Martha_Spurrier_-_The_great_safety_net.pdf</id>
		<title>File:Solicitors Journal - Martha Spurrier - The great safety net.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:Solicitors_Journal_-_Martha_Spurrier_-_The_great_safety_net.pdf"/>
				<updated>2012-05-11T18:37:55Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This article was first published in [http://www.solicitorsjournal.com Solicitors Journal] on 2/4/12 and is reproduced by kind permission.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates</id>
		<title>Updates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates"/>
				<updated>2012-05-10T18:45:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you have anything which is not yet on the internet (e.g. court results or transcripts) then please send it in (see [[Help|Help page]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping up to date==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Email_updates http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Email.jpg] You can now subscribe to free '''[[Email updates]]''', on an occasional or monthly basis. &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Discussion http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Discussion.png] Join the new [[Discussion|email discussion list]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/t_mini-a.png] Receive updates as soon as they are added by following us on Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline @mhlonline]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Updates&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/RSS.gif] Subscribe to the website's [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Updates&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed RSS update feed]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Kindle_updates http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/E-book_16x16.png]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; Receive monthly updates delivered automatically to your [[Kindle updates|Kindle e-reader]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent updates on website==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bullet_feed title=&amp;quot;Mental Health Law Online Update RSS&amp;quot; desc=&amp;quot;What's new on the site&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/05/12 (2): Scott Blair, 'A Summary of Mental Health Caselaw' (21/3/12). Plagiarism is the copying of someone else's words or ideas without attribution, intentionally or otherwise. In any place where you reproduce anything from this website, please remember to acknowledge the source and provide a link back to the relevant page. Scott Blair, a Scottish Advocate, immigration judge, MHT for Scotland legal convener, and Glasgow University external examiner, spoke on a paper entitled 'A Summary of Mental Health Caselaw' at a seminar on 21/3/12. In three parts it deals with cases from Scotland, England &amp;amp; Wales, and the ECtHR: ''all 20 case summaries in the second part, and eight in the third part, incorporate case summaries copied from Mental Health Law Online without any attribution'' (see pages 55-60, 62, 65-66, 69, 105-109, and 111). The document ends '© Scott Blair, Advocate' but there is no legal entitlement to claim copyright for material copied from Mental Health Law Online. See [[Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/05/12 (1): Valerie Mays, 'Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland: Case Digest' (December 2011). See [[Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*09/05/12 (1): The tribunal secretariat expect only to deal with urgent work on 10/5/12 as most of its staff will be on strike. If you cannot get through on the usual numbers, it is suggested that you call Karen Early (tribunal manager) on 0116 2497161, or email karen.early1@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk to arrange for a caseworker to ring back. See [http://www.mhla.co.uk/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=654 MHLA website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*08/05/12 (2): Transcript uploaded. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*08/05/12 (1): Transcript uploaded. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (20): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|Re G (2012) EWCA Civ 431, (2012) MHLO 52}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (19): Section 139 case. {{pagesummary|DD v Durham County Council (2012) EWHC 1053 (QB), (2012) MHLO 51}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (18): Text of two Welsh Government updates added: 25/4/12 (Mental Health - Primary Care Referrals and Eligibility to Conduct Primary Care Assessments - Wales - Regulations 2012) and 24/4/12 (Laying of the Code of Practice to Parts 2 and 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010). See [[Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (17): Consultation on a Separate Legal Jurisdiction for Wales (27/3/12 to 19/6/12). The Welsh Government are consulting on making things even more unnecessarily complicated, by creating an entirely separate legal jurisdiction for Wales. See [[Consultations#Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (16): Martha Spurrier, 'The great safety net' (Solicitors Journal, 2/4/12). Reproduced by kind permission. See [[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (15): LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12). The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (14): Steve Doughty, 'Father of two with motor neurone disease wins right to die by blinking his eye after judge's landmark ruling' (Daily Mail, 1/5/12). See [[Settled cases and forthcoming judgments#Re XB (advance decision, Theis J)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (13): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Parkins (2012) EWCA Crim 856, (2012) MHLO 50}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (12): PI quantum case. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (11): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (10): PVS case. {{pagesummary|Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (9): Best interests case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (8): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (7): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (6): Simon Edwards, 'Capacity and tenancies/licences' (39 Essex Street, 19/4/12). See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (5): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 21, May 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP) — Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33 — Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP) — Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47 — Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48 — Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (4): Rosalind English, 'Delay in transferring mental health patient for treatment amounted to &amp;quot;inhumane treatment&amp;quot;' (3/5/12). This article concludes: 'This is a prime example of using Article 3 as a social and economic right, not a basic civil right, and thus extended leaves publicly funded authorities to carry out difficult jobs with threats of litigation looming on all sides. The UK courts recognised this claim for what it was, and dismissed it. Strasbourg should have done the same.' See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (3): Mental Health Cop Blog, 'MS v UK' (4/5/12). This article is in favour of the judgment and makes points in relation to (1) place of safety arguments, (2) accessing psychiatric beds, (3) media coverage, and (4) implications. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (2): ECtHR, 'Prolonged police detention of mentally-ill man without adequate medical care violated his Convention rights' (Press release ref ECHR 195 (2012), 3/5/12). This is the court's summary of the judgment. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (1): Article 3 case. {{pagesummary|MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/bullet_feed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update archive===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[April 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[March 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[February 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Updates|Previous updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Scotland</id>
		<title>Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Scotland"/>
				<updated>2012-05-10T18:41:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: /* External links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Articles==&lt;br /&gt;
{{catlist|Scotland}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Cases==&lt;br /&gt;
{{catlist|Scottish cases}}&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Consultations#Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/session/practicenotes/pn05_2004.pdf Court of Session Practice Note No 5 of 2004: Form of opinions and neutral citation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.mhtscotland.gov.uk/mhts/files/Case_Digest_-_December_2011 Valerie Mays, 'Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland: Case Digest' (December 2011)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:LSA Mental Health event 21 March 2012.pdf|Scott Blair, 'A Summary of Mental Health Caselaw' (21/3/12)]]. Plagiarism is the copying of someone else's words or ideas without attribution, intentionally or otherwise. In any place where you reproduce anything from this website, please remember to acknowledge the source and provide a link back to the relevant page. Scott Blair, a Scottish Advocate, immigration judge, MHT for Scotland legal convener, and Glasgow University external examiner, spoke on a paper entitled 'A Summary of Mental Health Caselaw' at a seminar on 21/3/12. In three parts it deals with cases from Scotland, England &amp;amp; Wales, and the ECtHR: ''all 20 case summaries in the second part, and eight in the third part, incorporate case summaries copied from Mental Health Law Online without any attribution'' (see pages 55-60, 62, 65-66, 69, 105-109, and 111). The document ends '© Scott Blair, Advocate' but there is no legal entitlement to claim copyright for material copied from Mental Health Law Online.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:LSA_Mental_Health_event_21_March_2012.pdf</id>
		<title>File:LSA Mental Health event 21 March 2012.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:LSA_Mental_Health_event_21_March_2012.pdf"/>
				<updated>2012-05-10T18:37:20Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Scott Blair, 'A Summary of Mental Health Caselaw' (21/3/12)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Download from: [http://www.murraystable.com/news-articles/articles/news-mental-health-caselaw-seminar-success-for-scott-blair Murray Stable website] ([http://www.murraystable.com/assets/files/LSA%20Mental%20Health%20event%2021%20March%202012%281%29.pdf direct link])&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Related page: [[Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Plagiarism is the copying of someone else's words or ideas without attribution, intentionally or otherwise. In any place where you reproduce anything from this website, please remember to acknowledge the source and provide a link back to the relevant page. Scott Blair, a Scottish Advocate, immigration judge, MHT for Scotland legal convener, and Glasgow University external examiner, spoke on a paper entitled 'A Summary of Mental Health Caselaw' at a seminar on 21/3/12. In three parts it deals with cases from Scotland, England &amp;amp; Wales, and the ECtHR: ''all 20 case summaries in the second part, and eight in the third part, incorporate case summaries copied from Mental Health Law Online without any attribution'' (see pages 55-60, 62, 65-66, 69, 105-109, and 111). The document ends '© Scott Blair, Advocate' but there is no legal entitlement to claim copyright for material copied from Mental Health Law Online.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following are the case summaries which were copied without attribution:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 55: {{pagesummary|RN v Curo Care (2011) UKUT 263 (AAC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 56: {{pagesummary|CM v Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (2011) UKUT 129 (AAC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 57: {{pagesummary|JLG v Managers of Llanarth Court (2011) UKUT 62 (AAC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 58: {{pagesummary|DL v South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (2010) UKUT 455 (AAC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 58: {{pagesummary|LC v DHIH (2010) UKUT 319 (AAC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 58: {{pagesummary|RH v South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (2010) UKUT 32 (AAC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 59: {{pagesummary|R (Manns) v London North and East MHRT (1999) EWHC 497 (Admin)}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 59: {{pagesummary|R (SSHD) v MHRT, re CH (2005) EWHC 746 (Admin)}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 59: {{pagesummary|B v Croydon Health Authority (1995) Fam 133}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 59: {{pagesummary|R (SC) v MHRT (2005) EWHC 17 (Admin)}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 60: {{pagesummary|R (DJ) v MHRT; R (AN) v MHRT (2005) EWHC 587 (Admin)}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 60: {{pagesummary|R (AN) v MHRT (2005) EWCA Civ 1605}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 62: {{pagesummary|R (H) v MHRT North and East London Region (2001) EWCA Civ 415}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 62: {{pagesummary|DL-H v Devon Partnership NHS Trust (2010) UKUT 102 (AAC)}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 65: {{pagesummary|R v Nottingham MHRT, ex p Secretary of State for the Home Department (Thomas) (1988) MHLO 1}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 65: {{pagesummary|McGrady, Re Application for Judicial Review (2003) NIQB 15}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 65: {{pagesummary|R (RD) v MHRT (2007) EWHC 781 (Admin)}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 65: {{pagesummary|R (PD) v West Midlands and North West MHRT (2004) EWCA Civ 311}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 66: {{pagesummary|SSJ v RB (2011) EWCA Civ 1608}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 69: {{pagesummary|R (Brady) v Dr Collins (2000) EWHC 639 (Admin)}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 105: {{pagesummary|Halilovic v Bosnia and Herzegovina 23968/05 (2009) ECHR 1933}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 106: {{pagesummary|Shulepova v Russia 34449/03 (2008) ECHR 1666}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 106: {{pagesummary|DN v Switzerland 27154/95 (2001) ECHR 235}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 107: {{pagesummary|S v Estonia 17779/08 (2011) ECHR 1511}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 108: {{pagesummary|Stanev v Bulgaria 36760/06 (2012) ECHR 46, (2012) MHLO 1}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 108: {{pagesummary|Hadzic and Suljic v Bosnia Herzegovina 39446/06 (2011) ECHR 911}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 109: {{pagesummary|Romanov v Russia 63993/00 (2005) ECHR 933}}&lt;br /&gt;
#Page 111: {{pagesummary|Wilkinson v UK 14659/02 (2006) ECHR 1171}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PDF file is reproduced from the Murray Stable website, the content of which is licensed under a [http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/scotland/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 2.5 Scotland Licence] and may be freely used for non-commercial purposes if credit is given under the tems of that licence.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:LSA_Mental_Health_event_21_March_2012.pdf</id>
		<title>File:LSA Mental Health event 21 March 2012.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:LSA_Mental_Health_event_21_March_2012.pdf"/>
				<updated>2012-05-10T18:30:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Scotland</id>
		<title>Scotland</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Scotland"/>
				<updated>2012-05-10T18:20:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: /* External links */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Articles==&lt;br /&gt;
{{catlist|Scotland}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Cases==&lt;br /&gt;
{{catlist|Scottish cases}}&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Consultations#Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/session/practicenotes/pn05_2004.pdf Court of Session Practice Note No 5 of 2004: Form of opinions and neutral citation]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.mhtscotland.gov.uk/mhts/files/Case_Digest_-_December_2011 Valerie Mays, 'Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland: Case Digest' (December 2011)]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates</id>
		<title>Updates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates"/>
				<updated>2012-05-09T22:31:37Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you have anything which is not yet on the internet (e.g. court results or transcripts) then please send it in (see [[Help|Help page]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping up to date==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Email_updates http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Email.jpg] You can now subscribe to free '''[[Email updates]]''', on an occasional or monthly basis. &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Discussion http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Discussion.png] Join the new [[Discussion|email discussion list]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/t_mini-a.png] Receive updates as soon as they are added by following us on Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline @mhlonline]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Updates&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/RSS.gif] Subscribe to the website's [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Updates&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed RSS update feed]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Kindle_updates http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/E-book_16x16.png]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; Receive monthly updates delivered automatically to your [[Kindle updates|Kindle e-reader]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent updates on website==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bullet_feed title=&amp;quot;Mental Health Law Online Update RSS&amp;quot; desc=&amp;quot;What's new on the site&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*09/05/12 (1): The tribunal secretariat expect only to deal with urgent work on 10/5/12 as most of its staff will be on strike. If you cannot get through on the usual numbers, it is suggested that you call Karen Early (tribunal manager) on 0116 2497161, or email karen.early1@tribunals.gsi.gov.uk to arrange for a caseworker to ring back. See [http://www.mhla.co.uk/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=654 MHLA website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*08/05/12 (2): Transcript uploaded. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*08/05/12 (1): Transcript uploaded. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (20): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|Re G (2012) EWCA Civ 431, (2012) MHLO 52}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (19): Section 139 case. {{pagesummary|DD v Durham County Council (2012) EWHC 1053 (QB), (2012) MHLO 51}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (18): Text of two Welsh Government updates added: 25/4/12 (Mental Health - Primary Care Referrals and Eligibility to Conduct Primary Care Assessments - Wales - Regulations 2012) and 24/4/12 (Laying of the Code of Practice to Parts 2 and 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010). See [[Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (17): Consultation on a Separate Legal Jurisdiction for Wales (27/3/12 to 19/6/12). The Welsh Government are consulting on making things even more unnecessarily complicated, by creating an entirely separate legal jurisdiction for Wales. See [[Consultations#Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (16): Martha Spurrier, 'The great safety net' (Solicitors Journal, 2/4/12). Reproduced by kind permission. See [[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (15): LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12). The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (14): Steve Doughty, 'Father of two with motor neurone disease wins right to die by blinking his eye after judge's landmark ruling' (Daily Mail, 1/5/12). See [[Settled cases and forthcoming judgments#Re XB (advance decision, Theis J)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (13): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Parkins (2012) EWCA Crim 856, (2012) MHLO 50}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (12): PI quantum case. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (11): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (10): PVS case. {{pagesummary|Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (9): Best interests case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (8): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (7): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (6): Simon Edwards, 'Capacity and tenancies/licences' (39 Essex Street, 19/4/12). See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (5): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 21, May 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP) — Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33 — Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP) — Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47 — Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48 — Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (4): Rosalind English, 'Delay in transferring mental health patient for treatment amounted to &amp;quot;inhumane treatment&amp;quot;' (3/5/12). This article concludes: 'This is a prime example of using Article 3 as a social and economic right, not a basic civil right, and thus extended leaves publicly funded authorities to carry out difficult jobs with threats of litigation looming on all sides. The UK courts recognised this claim for what it was, and dismissed it. Strasbourg should have done the same.' See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (3): Mental Health Cop Blog, 'MS v UK' (4/5/12). This article is in favour of the judgment and makes points in relation to (1) place of safety arguments, (2) accessing psychiatric beds, (3) media coverage, and (4) implications. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (2): ECtHR, 'Prolonged police detention of mentally-ill man without adequate medical care violated his Convention rights' (Press release ref ECHR 195 (2012), 3/5/12). This is the court's summary of the judgment. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (1): Article 3 case. {{pagesummary|MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/bullet_feed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update archive===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[April 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[March 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[February 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Updates|Previous updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Cheshire_West_and_Chester_Council_v_P_(2011)_EWCA_Civ_1257</id>
		<title>Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Cheshire_West_and_Chester_Council_v_P_(2011)_EWCA_Civ_1257"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T19:35:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''P's care plan at Z House did ''not'' amount to a deprivation of liberty: &amp;quot;At Z House and outside it P is living a life which is as normal as it can be for someone in his situation.&amp;quot;''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related judgments==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1333]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257]] &lt;br /&gt;
::*[[Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWHC 1330 (COP)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ICLR==&lt;br /&gt;
{{ICLR|Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Summary and Commentary==&lt;br /&gt;
“Deprivation of Liberty” has always been a slippery concept, in a health and social care setting, but with huge risks if you get it wrong.  A deprivation of liberty without lawful justification, and due legal process for scrutiny, would be a breach of the person’s rights under Article 5 of the European Convention, with all the adverse consequences of possible liability in damages, or punishment in legal costs and, increasingly, very public criticism in court and the media, especially in the cases of public authorities which fall foul of this.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Court of Appeal Judgment in P v Cheshire West and Chester Council (9 November 2011) has turned this upside down.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
P was a 39 year old man with learning disabilities and autism, who lacked capacity to make decisions about his accommodation and care.  In April 2011 a judge held that he was deprived of his liberty in his local authority placement at Z House, as staff had complete and effective control of his life, sometimes using a “body suit” zipped at the back to prevent him getting to his continence pads, which he had a habit of eating.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Court of Appeal says, in essence, that this care was required as a result of his condition, was “normal” for people like him, and therefore no deprivation.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lord Justice Munby’s thorough review of the case law revisits two key issues – “purpose”, and “normality”, which the court also wrestled with in the case of “MIG and MEG” (known as “P and Q” in the Court of Appeal).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He accepts that subjective good intentions do not render innocuous a situation that would otherwise be a deprivation of liberty (though he does think that acting in bad faith could turn a situation into a deprivation of liberty) (para 71).  He distinguishes this from the objective issue of the aim of the restrictions, put in terms of the &amp;quot;purpose&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;reasons&amp;quot;, which he says must be relevant to whether or not a situation is a deprivation of liberty (para 75-76).  This may seem a fine distinction, but its real significance is clear when Lord Justice Munby goes on to look at the context and &amp;quot;normality&amp;quot; of the placement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He said the key is to assess the “relative normality” of P’s life, taking into account the particular care needs arising simply from his physical or mental condition.  It is not appropriate to compare P with a healthy adult, who would clearly be deprived of his liberty in these circumstances.  “Some adults are inherently restricted by their circumstances”, and the court of protection is dealing with adults “with significant physical and learning disabilities whose lives are dictated by their own cognitive and other limitations”.  The appropriate contrast to draw is with “the kind of lives that people like [P] would normally expect to lead” (paras 86, 97 and 102),&lt;br /&gt;
In this case, the first instance judge failed to see that the restrictions and limits on his life at Z house were nothing more than &amp;quot;the inevitable corollary of his various disabilities&amp;quot; (para 110), and “there was nothing to show the life he is living at Z House is significantly different from the kind of life that anyone with his concatenation of difficulties could normally expect to lead….&amp;quot;  The reality is that P was &amp;quot;living a life which is as normal as it can be for someone in his situation&amp;quot;, and therefore he was not being deprived of his liberty (para 110, 116).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is hugely significant, and seems to raise a number of issues which the courts will have to continue to clarify over the next few years:-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.	Since the introduction of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS), massive effort has been spent on education that a &amp;quot;deprivation of liberty&amp;quot; is not necessarily a bad thing, or inappropriate, but simply requires scrutiny and lawful authorisation (whether through DOLS in a care home or hospital, or the court of protection in other circumstances).  Anecdotally, one of the reasons given for apparent underuse of DOLS is that professional staff understandably find “deprivation” a pejorative term, and are reluctant to recognise it in the care provided which is, usually, assessed in good-faith to meet the needs of P’s physical and mental condition.  Lord Munby’s judgement, perhaps, shows that they have been right all along.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.	If it is right that restrictions imposed simply to meet the needs of P’s condition are by definition not a deprivation of liberty, it becomes difficult to imagine a situation that would be a deprivation that could nevertheless be lawful (whether by DOLS authorisation or by court of protection order) as being in P’s best interests, necessary and proportionate, and the least restrictive option.  It would seem that all the conditions that are required to make any deprivation lawful will, in effect, mean in most cases that there is no deprivation at all.  Education and training that has emphasised the need to separate the primary question of whether there is a deprivation of liberty from the secondary question of lawful justification may now to be revised.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.	As with the health and social care system as a whole, the issue of choice is paramount.  If there is no realistic alternative to his current placement and circumstances, then it seems there is no deprivation of liberty (para 58).  Taken together with the recent high-profile case of Neary vs Hillingdon, it seems most likely that a deprivation of liberty will occur where a family and a public body offer competing proposals for care, and in particular where the state tries to assert some control over what would otherwise be family life, protected by article 8 as much as article 5.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.	If that is the case, we may wonder if there is a discriminatory effect against those vulnerable people, lacking capacity, who do not have family offering alternative proposals, who may therefore be deemed not deprived of liberty, and will not have the benefit of any scrutiny of their care, either through DOLS or the court.  The experience of recent scandals and reports about care of the most vulnerable in society might encourage a public view that more procedural scrutiny and safeguards are required, rather than less.  Equally, there may be those who find the language of judging X’s care according to the life expected by &amp;quot;people like X” (para 102) a little uncomfortable, in the context of trends towards individual care and personalisation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.	The deprivation of liberty safeguards were introduced because the European Court of Human Rights found that HL was deprived of his liberty at a mental hospital where he was detained as an informal patient, for which the common law doctrine of “necessity” was insufficient justification or safeguard.  Lord Justice Munby observes that this is a far cry from cases in which someone is in a family or foster home, or small residential unit.  However, the hospital in that case was simply doing what it judged was in HL's best interests, as required by his physical and mental condition.  That his foster carers wanted to bring him home seems to be the only feature that would establish there was a deprivation of liberty in his case, following Chester.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.	In the absence of family, or others, pressing for an alternative, the reasoning in Chester seems to risk going full circle - back to before HL and DOLS - re-establishing deference to a professional assessment, with any restrictions put in place in good faith according to the physical and mental health needs being deemed not to be a deprivation of liberty, without significant scrutiny and perhaps not so very far, in practice, from the old common law idea of &amp;quot;necessity&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strictly speaking, there may be no need to bring cases to the court if it is not felt, or disputed, that there might be a deprivation but we tentatively suggest it would be prudent to continue to seek confirmation from the court where there is any doubt.  Lord Justice Munby hints at this when he says that many cases coming to court will be fairly obviously no deprivation - for example “if someone is being cared for by their parents, friends or relatives in a family home …or in a foster placement or its adult equivalent in small specialist sheltered accommodation” (para 103) - and the court will be able to deal with most cases of this type &amp;quot;fairly but at the same time simply and quickly… on the basis that there is no deprivation of liberty&amp;quot; (para 104).  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This would certainly ease the pressure a little on public authorities, the official solicitor and the court, who are all currently snowed under with applications, particularly in the wake of Neary, but it remains to be seen whether the notions of &amp;quot;purpose&amp;quot; and particularly &amp;quot;normality&amp;quot; in turn raise more questions than answers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
Hearing: 22/9/11&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judgment: 9/11/11&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before: Pill, Lloyd, Munby LLJ&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ms Jenni Richards QC and Mr Neil Allen (instructed by Legal Services Department, Cheshire West and Chester Council) for the Appellant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr Richard Gordon QC and Mr Simon Burrows (instructed by O'Donnells on behalf of the Official Solicitor) for the Respondent&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Citations==&lt;br /&gt;
[2011] All ER (D) 150 (Nov)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{bailii|(2011) EWCA Civ 1257}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://cases.iclr.co.uk/Subscr/search.aspx?path=WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2011-325 ICLR]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk/index.php?&amp;amp;id=8508 Philip Hoult, 'Local authority wins appeal in landmark ruling on deprivations of liberty' (Local Government Lawyer, 10/11/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://odonnells-solicitors.co.uk/133.html O'Donnells Solicitors, 'Article 5 – The Court of Appeal Has Another Go!' (10/11/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.communitycare.co.uk/blogs/adult-care-blog/2011/11/key-deprivation-of-liberty-safeguards-judgement-explained.html Mithran Samuel, 'Key deprivation of liberty safeguards judgement explained' (Community Care, 9/11/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:Morgan Cole Cheshire briefing Jan 2012.pdf|Morgan Cole Solicitors, 'Deprivation of Liberty case update' (January 2012)]]. The 'Action required' conclusion of this briefing states: 'The guidance contained in this judgment should be&lt;br /&gt;
disseminated to those who work with patients and&lt;br /&gt;
service users who lack capacity and are responsible&lt;br /&gt;
for care planning. The case clarifies that where there&lt;br /&gt;
is no evidence to show that an individual’s living&lt;br /&gt;
arrangements in a hospital or care home are&lt;br /&gt;
significantly different from the kind of life that anyone&lt;br /&gt;
with their disability could normally expect wherever&lt;br /&gt;
and in whatever setting they were living, the provision&lt;br /&gt;
of their care and treatment will not, of itself, amount&lt;br /&gt;
to a deprivation of liberty.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:O'Donnells Cheshire Info sheet Jan 2012 no2.pdf|John O'Donnell, 'Cheshire West and Chester Council v P' (commentary) (O'Donnells Solicitors information sheet, January 2012, no 2)]]. This article is critical of recent case law on what constitutes a deprivation of liberty.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/18/01/2012/117931/the-deprivation-of-liberty-safeguards-are-not-dead.htm Lorraine Currie, 'Useful tools for best interests assessors from key Dols case' (Local Government Lawyer, 18/1/12)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:Solicitors Journal - David Hewitt - Purpose alone.pdf|David Hewitt, 'Purpose alone can no longer determine if there is a deprivation of liberty' (Solicitors Journal, 16/4/12)]]. This article argues that the reference in the Court of Appeal decision in Cheshire West to 'purpose' as being relevant to the objective element of deprivation of liberty is not supported  by the subsequent ECtHR decision in [[Austin v UK 39692/09 (2012) ECHR 459, (2012) MHLO 22|Austin]]. This article was first published in [http://www.solicitorsjournal.com Solicitors Journal] on 17/4/12 and is reproduced by kind permission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Detailed summary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2011 cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:Solicitors_Journal_-_David_Hewitt_-_Purpose_alone.pdf</id>
		<title>File:Solicitors Journal - David Hewitt - Purpose alone.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:Solicitors_Journal_-_David_Hewitt_-_Purpose_alone.pdf"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T19:33:09Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This article was first published in [http://www.solicitorsjournal.com Solicitors Journal] on 17/4/12 and is reproduced by kind permission.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:Solicitors_Journal_-_David_Hewitt_-_Purpose_alone.pdf</id>
		<title>File:Solicitors Journal - David Hewitt - Purpose alone.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:Solicitors_Journal_-_David_Hewitt_-_Purpose_alone.pdf"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T19:31:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Austin_v_Commissioner_of_Police_of_the_Metropolis_(2009)_UKHL_5</id>
		<title>Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2009) UKHL 5</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Austin_v_Commissioner_of_Police_of_the_Metropolis_(2009)_UKHL_5"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T19:27:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''(1) The difference between deprivation of and restriction upon liberty is merely one of degree or intensity, not one of nature or substance; it is highly sensitive to the facts of each case. (2) Where the purpose of the measure is relevant, it must be to enable a balance to be struck between what the restriction seeks to achieve and the interests of the individual; there is room, even in the case of fundamental rights, for a pragmatic approach which takes full account of all the circumstances; however, in general, purpose is relevant, not to whether the Article 5 threshold is crossed, but to justification under 5(1)(a) to (e). (3) Measures of crowd control will fall outside the ambit of [[Article 5]] so long as they are not arbitrary, i.e. they must be resorted to in good faith, they must be proportionate, and they must not be enforced for longer than is reasonably necessary; the confinement by the police of the claimant for seven hours in Oxford Circus in order to avoid physical injuries and property damage therefore did not engage Article 5; if Article 5 had been engaged then the deprivation of liberty could not have been justified under Article 5(1)(a) to (e) for each individual in the crowd. ''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related judgments==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Austin v UK 39692/09 (2012) ECHR 459, (2012) MHLO 22]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2009) UKHL 5]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2007) EWCA Civ 989]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ICLR==&lt;br /&gt;
{{ICLR|Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2009) UKHL 5}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jul/19/metropolitan-police-kettling-human-rights Metropolitan police's 'kettling' tactic challenged in European court, Guardian, 19/7/09]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.solicitorsjournal.com/story.asp?sectioncode=103&amp;amp;storycode=13590&amp;amp;c=3&amp;amp;eclipse_action=getsession Trapped protester ruling may be referred to Court of Human Rights, Solicitors Journal, 3/2/09]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2009/5.html Bailii - House of Lords]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.lawreports.co.uk/WLRD/2009/HLPC/Jan.0.5.html ICLR report] - [2009] WLR (D) 26&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Detailed summary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2009 cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Austin_v_Commissioner_of_Police_of_the_Metropolis_(2007)_EWCA_Civ_989</id>
		<title>Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2007) EWCA Civ 989</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Austin_v_Commissioner_of_Police_of_the_Metropolis_(2007)_EWCA_Civ_989"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T19:27:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Kettling/[[Article 5]] case. [Summary required.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related judgments==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Austin v UK 39692/09 (2012) ECHR 459, (2012) MHLO 22]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2009) UKHL 5]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2007) EWCA Civ 989]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External link==&lt;br /&gt;
{{bailii|(2007) EWCA Civ 989}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:No summary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2007 cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Austin_v_UK_39692/09_(2012)_ECHR_459,_(2012)_MHLO_22</id>
		<title>Austin v UK 39692/09 (2012) ECHR 459, (2012) MHLO 22</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Austin_v_UK_39692/09_(2012)_ECHR_459,_(2012)_MHLO_22"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T19:26:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Kettling did not breach [[Article 5]]. [Summary required.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related judgments==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Austin v UK 39692/09 (2012) ECHR 459, (2012) MHLO 22]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2009) UKHL 5]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2007) EWCA Civ 989]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External link==&lt;br /&gt;
{{bailii|(2012) ECHR 459}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ECHR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:No summary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Austin_v_Commissioner_of_Police_of_the_Metropolis_(2007)_EWCA_Civ_989</id>
		<title>Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2007) EWCA Civ 989</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Austin_v_Commissioner_of_Police_of_the_Metropolis_(2007)_EWCA_Civ_989"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T19:26:31Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: Created page with &amp;quot;Kettling/Article 5 case. [Summary required.]  ==External link== {{bailii|(2007) EWCA Civ 989}}  Category:Deprivation of liberty Category:No summary [[Category:Tran...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Kettling/[[Article 5]] case. [Summary required.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External link==&lt;br /&gt;
{{bailii|(2007) EWCA Civ 989}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:No summary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2007 cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Talk:Verlander_v_Rahman_(2012)_EWHC_1026_(QB),_(2012)_MHLO_49</id>
		<title>Talk:Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Talk:Verlander_v_Rahman_(2012)_EWHC_1026_(QB),_(2012)_MHLO_49"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T19:25:30Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: Created page with &amp;quot;Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Contributors</id>
		<title>Contributors</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Contributors"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T19:25:13Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Thanks are due to those listed below for their contributions to the website. Visit the [[Help page]] if you would like to write for the site; send unpublished transcripts or other useful resources to jonathan at mentalhealthlaw.co.uk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Tim Baldwin, Garden Court Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[JP v Birmingham and Solihull MH NHS Trust (2010) Upper Tribunal 30/7/10 (HM/535/2010)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[R (W) v Dr Larkin (2012) EWHC 556 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 23]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*James Batey, Court of Protection&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re FL; HN v FL and Hampshire CC (2011) EWHC 2894 (COP)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re HM; SM v HM (2011) COP 11875043 4/11/11]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Victoria Butler-Cole, 39 Essex Street&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Dorset CC v EH (2009) EWHC 784 (Fam)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Philippa Curran, O'Donnells Solicitors&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[R (RB) v First-tier Tribunal (Review) (2010) UKUT 160 (AAC)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Laura Davidson, No 5 Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[DCC v KH (2009) COP 11729380]] - transcript and help with summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[GJ v The Foundation Trust (2009) EWHC 2972 (Fam)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Rheian Davies, DH Law&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[BB v Cygnet Health Care (2008) EWHC 1259 (Admin)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[M v Hospital Managers of Queen Mary's Hospital (2008) EWHC 1959 (Admin)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[GD v Hospital Managers of Edgware Community Hospital (2008) EWHC 3572 (Admin)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[R (TF) v SSJ (2008) EWCA Civ 1457]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[R (F) v SSJ (2008) EWHC 2912 (Admin)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Claire Fife, Mental Health Legislation Manager, Welsh Assembly Government&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010]] - update emails etc&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*James Gatenby, Chavasse Chambers &lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re GM; FP v GM and A Health Board (2011) EWHC 2778 (COP)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Kris Gledhill, Mental Health Law Reports editor&lt;br /&gt;
:*Summaries for many 1999 cases&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Richard Jones, Morgan Cole LLP&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Selwood v Durham CC (2011) Newcastle-upon-Tyne county court 25/2/11]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Penny Letts, Elder Law Journal editor&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re JP; DP v JCP (2010) COP 11692737]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Sophy Miles, Miles &amp;amp; Partners LLP&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re F (2009) EWHC B30 (Fam)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re GC (2008) EWHC 3402 (Fam)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[City of Westminster v FS (2009) COP 11685959]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re MP; LBH v GP (2009) FD08P01058]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re Steven Neary; LB Hillingdon v Steven Neary (2011) EWHC 3522 (COP)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Gina Morgan, Finance Officer, Avon and Wiltshire MH Partnership NHS Trust&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Social Security (Persons Serving a Sentence of Imprisonment Detained in Hospital) Regulations 2010]] - emailing link to the legislation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Roger Pezzani, Garden Court Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[PS v Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust (2011) UKUT 143 (AAC)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Barbara Rich, 5 Stone Buildings&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re S and S (Protected Persons); C v V (2008) EWHC B16 (Fam)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:Aruckkeene|Alex Ruck-Keene]], 39 Essex Street&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re S; D v R (the deputy of S) (2010) EWHC 3748 (COP)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[LG v DK (2011) EWHC 2453 (COP)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re DU; A NHS Trust v DU (2009) EWHC 3504 (Fam)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[R v Hopkins; R v Priest (2011) EWCA Crim 1513]] -  transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re CM; LBB v JM (2010) COP 5/2/10]] - transcript and summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[A Local Authority v DL (2011) EWHC 1022 (Fam)]] - transcript and summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re Hunt (2008) (Preston county court, 12/6/08)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re P; A Local Authority v PB (2011) EWHC 502 (COP)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re AH; AH v Hertfordshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (2011) EWHC 276 (COP)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re AVS; AVS v A NHS Foundation Trust (2011) EWCA Civ 7]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[TTM v LB Hackney (2011) EWCA Civ 4]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re HM; PM v KH (2010) EWHC 3279 (Fam)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[LB Enfield v SA (2010) EWHC 196 (Admin)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[G v E (2010) EWCA Civ 822]] - commentary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re HM; PM v KH (2008) EWHC 2824 (Fam)]] - summary and commentary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[HBCC v LG (2010) EWHC 1527 (Fam)‎]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re MN (2010) EWHC 1926 (Fam)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[BB v AM (2010) EWHC 1916 (Fam)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[D County Council v LS (2010) EWHC 1544 (Fam)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[London Borough of Havering v LD and KD (2010) COP 1144388/03]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re RC (Deceased); SC v LB Hackney (2010) EWHC B29 (COP)]] - summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[YA(F) v A Local Authority (2010) EWHC 2770 (COP)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[LBL v RYJ (2010) EWHC 2665 (COP)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re MM; City of Sunderland v MM (2011) 1 FLR 712]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[G v E (2010) EWHC 3385 (Fam)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re RK; YB v BCC (2010) EWHC 3355 (COP)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Cardiff Council v Peggy Ross (2011) COP 28/10/11 12063905]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re H; A Local Authority v H (2012) EWHC 49 (COP), (2012) MHLO 3]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re JDS; Kevin Smyth v JDS (2012) COP 19334473 19/1/12, (2012) MHLO 4]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Ron Rushbrook, CQC&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Mental Health Act 1983 Statutory Forms]] - CQC treatment forms&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:Matthew Seligman|Matthew Seligman]], Scott-Moncrieff Solicitors&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[R (Sessay) v South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (2011) EWHC 2617 (QB)]] - detailed summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[TTM v LB Hackney (2011) EWCA Civ 4]] - summary and transcript&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[R (ZN) v South West London and St George's Mental Health NHS Trust (2009) CO/9457/2009]] - summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[M v East London NHS Foundation Trust CO/1065/2009]] - transcript and summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[CV v South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust (2010) EWHC 742 (Admin)]] - transcript and summary&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Amy Street, 3 Serjeants' Inn&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Manchester City Council v G (2011) EWCA Civ 939]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Paul Thorpe, Rochdale MBC&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[R (Woods) v Rochdale MBC (2009) EWHC 323 (Admin)‎]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:Bentroke|Ben Troke]], Browne Jacobson Solicitors&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257]] - summary and commentary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re A (Adult) and Re C (Child); A Local Authority v A (2010) EWHC 978 (Fam)]] - summary and commentary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[G v E (2010) EWCA Civ 822]] - summary and commentary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[RT v LT (2010) EWHC 1910 (Fam)]] - summary&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Karen Wolton, Wolton &amp;amp; Co Solicitors&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[RN v Curo Care (2011) UKUT 263 (AAC)]] - transcript&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:Ds|Ds]]&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Henderson v MHTS (2010) ScotSC x]] - summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[LM v MHTS (2010) ScotSC x]] - summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[AB v MHTS (2008) GWD 36-543]] - summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Di Mascio v MHTS (2008) GWD 37-559]] - summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Laurie v MHTS (2007) GWD 32-555]] - summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Smith v MHTS (2006) CSOH 44]] - summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re FB (Incapacity Application) (2005) ScotSC 26]] - summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[City of Edinburgh Council v D (2010) ScotSC 30/9/10]] - summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re LC (2005) ScotSC 19/5/05]] - summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re HP (Remuneration of a Financial Guardian under Section 68 of the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000) (2010) ScotSC 21/7/10]] - summary&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[Re DC (Dispensing with Service of Applications under the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 on the Adult) (2010) ScotSC 6]] - summary&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks also to the following users for miscellaneous edits to the website pages: [[Special:Contributions/Ron Barker|Ron Barker]], [[Special:Contributions/Pembrokemha|Pembrokemha]], [[Special:Contributions/Frame|Frame]], [[Special:Contributions/Parsley|Parsley]], [[Special:Contributions/MatthewJS|MatthewJS]], [[Special:Contributions/Julian|Julian]], [[Special:Contributions/John1|John1]], [[Special:Contributions/RonBarker|RonBarker]], [[Special:Contributions/Chrisbrace|Chrisbrace]], [[Special:Contributions/David|David]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Austin_v_UK_39692/09_(2012)_ECHR_459,_(2012)_MHLO_22</id>
		<title>Austin v UK 39692/09 (2012) ECHR 459, (2012) MHLO 22</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Austin_v_UK_39692/09_(2012)_ECHR_459,_(2012)_MHLO_22"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T19:24:45Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Kettling did not breach [[Article 5]]. [Summary required.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related judgments==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Austin v UK 39692/09 (2012) ECHR 459, (2012) MHLO 22]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2009) UKHL 5]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2007) EWCA Civ 989]]&amp;lt;ref&amp;gt;[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2007/989.html Bailii - Court of Appeal]&amp;lt;/ref&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External link==&lt;br /&gt;
{{bailii|(2012) ECHR 459}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;!--Add Neutral citation between | and }} in line above--&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;references/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Deprivation of liberty]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:ECHR]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:No summary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates</id>
		<title>Updates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T18:56:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you have anything which is not yet on the internet (e.g. court results or transcripts) then please send it in (see [[Help|Help page]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping up to date==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Email_updates http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Email.jpg] You can now subscribe to free '''[[Email updates]]''', on an occasional or monthly basis. &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Discussion http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Discussion.png] Join the new [[Discussion|email discussion list]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/t_mini-a.png] Receive updates as soon as they are added by following us on Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline @mhlonline]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Updates&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/RSS.gif] Subscribe to the website's [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Updates&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed RSS update feed]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Kindle_updates http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/E-book_16x16.png]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; Receive monthly updates delivered automatically to your [[Kindle updates|Kindle e-reader]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent updates on website==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bullet_feed title=&amp;quot;Mental Health Law Online Update RSS&amp;quot; desc=&amp;quot;What's new on the site&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*08/05/12 (2): Transcript uploaded. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*08/05/12 (1): Transcript uploaded. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (20): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|Re G (2012) EWCA Civ 431, (2012) MHLO 52}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (19): Section 139 case. {{pagesummary|DD v Durham County Council (2012) EWHC 1053 (QB), (2012) MHLO 51}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (18): Text of two Welsh Government updates added: 25/4/12 (Mental Health - Primary Care Referrals and Eligibility to Conduct Primary Care Assessments - Wales - Regulations 2012) and 24/4/12 (Laying of the Code of Practice to Parts 2 and 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010). See [[Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (17): Consultation on a Separate Legal Jurisdiction for Wales (27/3/12 to 19/6/12). The Welsh Government are consulting on making things even more unnecessarily complicated, by creating an entirely separate legal jurisdiction for Wales. See [[Consultations#Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (16): Martha Spurrier, 'The great safety net' (Solicitors Journal, 2/4/12). Reproduced by kind permission. See [[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (15): LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12). The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (14): Steve Doughty, 'Father of two with motor neurone disease wins right to die by blinking his eye after judge's landmark ruling' (Daily Mail, 1/5/12). See [[Settled cases and forthcoming judgments#Re XB (advance decision, Theis J)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (13): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Parkins (2012) EWCA Crim 856, (2012) MHLO 50}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (12): PI quantum case. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (11): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (10): PVS case. {{pagesummary|Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (9): Best interests case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (8): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (7): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (6): Simon Edwards, 'Capacity and tenancies/licences' (39 Essex Street, 19/4/12). See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (5): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 21, May 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP) — Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33 — Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP) — Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47 — Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48 — Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (4): Rosalind English, 'Delay in transferring mental health patient for treatment amounted to &amp;quot;inhumane treatment&amp;quot;' (3/5/12). This article concludes: 'This is a prime example of using Article 3 as a social and economic right, not a basic civil right, and thus extended leaves publicly funded authorities to carry out difficult jobs with threats of litigation looming on all sides. The UK courts recognised this claim for what it was, and dismissed it. Strasbourg should have done the same.' See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (3): Mental Health Cop Blog, 'MS v UK' (4/5/12). This article is in favour of the judgment and makes points in relation to (1) place of safety arguments, (2) accessing psychiatric beds, (3) media coverage, and (4) implications. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (2): ECtHR, 'Prolonged police detention of mentally-ill man without adequate medical care violated his Convention rights' (Press release ref ECHR 195 (2012), 3/5/12). This is the court's summary of the judgment. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (1): Article 3 case. {{pagesummary|MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/bullet_feed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update archive===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[April 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[March 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[February 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Updates|Previous updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Verlander_v_Rahman_(2012)_EWHC_1026_(QB),_(2012)_MHLO_49</id>
		<title>Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Verlander_v_Rahman_(2012)_EWHC_1026_(QB),_(2012)_MHLO_49"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T18:54:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''Personal injury quantum judgment including the following issues: (1) whether and to what extent the claimant's disabilities were due to frontal lobe brain damage (and are now incapable of significant improvement) or due depression or psychological factors (which may well improve over time); (2) whether the claimant had capacity to manage her properties and affairs.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External link==&lt;br /&gt;
{{bailii|(2012) EWHC 1026 (QB)|no}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49.pdf|Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Other capacity cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Brief summary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:Verlander_v_Rahman_(2012)_EWHC_1026_(QB),_(2012)_MHLO_49.pdf</id>
		<title>File:Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:Verlander_v_Rahman_(2012)_EWHC_1026_(QB),_(2012)_MHLO_49.pdf"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T18:54:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/LB_Haringey_v_FG_(No._1)_(2011)_EWHC_3932_(COP)</id>
		<title>LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/LB_Haringey_v_FG_(No._1)_(2011)_EWHC_3932_(COP)"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T18:52:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;In this case there are a number of matters: does H have capacity to conduct litigation; does she have capacity to decide where she should live, or capacity to decide where she should be educated, or capacity to decide on the extent of the contact and relationship she should have with her natural family; capacity to deal with her financial affairs, or to enter into what has been described as a tenancy agreement, and capacity in a sense to judge her own best interests in those respects?&amp;quot; [Summary required.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related cases==&lt;br /&gt;
[[LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{bailii|(2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)|no}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP).pdf|Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Other capacity cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:No summary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2011 cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:LB_Haringey_v_FG_(No._1)_(2011)_EWHC_3932_(COP).pdf</id>
		<title>File:LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP).pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:LB_Haringey_v_FG_(No._1)_(2011)_EWHC_3932_(COP).pdf"/>
				<updated>2012-05-08T18:51:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Law_Society_practice_note_on_representation_before_Mental_Health_Tribunals</id>
		<title>Law Society practice note on representation before Mental Health Tribunals</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Law_Society_practice_note_on_representation_before_Mental_Health_Tribunals"/>
				<updated>2012-05-07T17:10:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;This practice note, dated 19/5/11, advises on providing legal advice to clients appearing before the First Tier Tribunal (Mental Health) in England and the Mental Health Review Tribunal for Wales. It has information under the following headings: (1) Introduction; (2) The right to legal advice and representation before the tribunal; (3) Communication with the client; (4) Taking instructions; (5) Your duties towards your client; (6) Good tribunal practice; (7) Representing children and young people before the tribunal; (8) More information. The previous version of 13/8/09 was criticised in [[AA v Cheshire and Wirral Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (2009) UKUT 195 (AAC)]] - this version criticises that case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Law Society]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External link==&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Law Society Tribunal practice note.pdf|Law Society, 'Practice note: Representation before mental health tribunals' (19/5/11)]]. Current guidance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/documents/downloads/Rep%20at%20MHRTs%20-%20Guidelines.pdf Law Society, 'Representation at Mental Health Review Tribunals: Guidelines for Legal Representatives' (2002)]. The old guidance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Text of *OLD* Law Society Guidance==&lt;br /&gt;
This is several years old but is reproduced below out of interest.&lt;br /&gt;
{{:Law Society guidance text}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Tribunal resources]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates</id>
		<title>Updates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates"/>
				<updated>2012-05-06T20:14:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: /* Keeping up to date */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you have anything which is not yet on the internet (e.g. court results or transcripts) then please send it in (see [[Help|Help page]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping up to date==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Email_updates http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Email.jpg] You can now subscribe to free '''[[Email updates]]''', on an occasional or monthly basis. &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Discussion http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Discussion.png] Join the new [[Discussion|email discussion list]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/t_mini-a.png] Receive updates as soon as they are added by following us on Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline @mhlonline]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Updates&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/RSS.gif] Subscribe to the website's [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Updates&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed RSS update feed]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Kindle_updates http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/E-book_16x16.png]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt; Receive monthly updates delivered automatically to your [[Kindle updates|Kindle e-reader]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent updates on website==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bullet_feed title=&amp;quot;Mental Health Law Online Update RSS&amp;quot; desc=&amp;quot;What's new on the site&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (20): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|Re G (2012) EWCA Civ 431, (2012) MHLO 52}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (19): Section 139 case. {{pagesummary|DD v Durham County Council (2012) EWHC 1053 (QB), (2012) MHLO 51}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (18): Text of two Welsh Government updates added: 25/4/12 (Mental Health - Primary Care Referrals and Eligibility to Conduct Primary Care Assessments - Wales - Regulations 2012) and 24/4/12 (Laying of the Code of Practice to Parts 2 and 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010). See [[Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (17): Consultation on a Separate Legal Jurisdiction for Wales (27/3/12 to 19/6/12). The Welsh Government are consulting on making things even more unnecessarily complicated, by creating an entirely separate legal jurisdiction for Wales. See [[Consultations#Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (16): Martha Spurrier, 'The great safety net' (Solicitors Journal, 2/4/12). Reproduced by kind permission. See [[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (15): LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12). The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (14): Steve Doughty, 'Father of two with motor neurone disease wins right to die by blinking his eye after judge's landmark ruling' (Daily Mail, 1/5/12). See [[Settled cases and forthcoming judgments#Re XB (advance decision, Theis J)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (13): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Parkins (2012) EWCA Crim 856, (2012) MHLO 50}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (12): PI quantum case. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (11): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (10): PVS case. {{pagesummary|Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (9): Best interests case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (8): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (7): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (6): Simon Edwards, 'Capacity and tenancies/licences' (39 Essex Street, 19/4/12). See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (5): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 21, May 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP) — Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33 — Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP) — Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47 — Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48 — Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (4): Rosalind English, 'Delay in transferring mental health patient for treatment amounted to &amp;quot;inhumane treatment&amp;quot;' (3/5/12). This article concludes: 'This is a prime example of using Article 3 as a social and economic right, not a basic civil right, and thus extended leaves publicly funded authorities to carry out difficult jobs with threats of litigation looming on all sides. The UK courts recognised this claim for what it was, and dismissed it. Strasbourg should have done the same.' See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (3): Mental Health Cop Blog, 'MS v UK' (4/5/12). This article is in favour of the judgment and makes points in relation to (1) place of safety arguments, (2) accessing psychiatric beds, (3) media coverage, and (4) implications. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (2): ECtHR, 'Prolonged police detention of mentally-ill man without adequate medical care violated his Convention rights' (Press release ref ECHR 195 (2012), 3/5/12). This is the court's summary of the judgment. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (1): Article 3 case. {{pagesummary|MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/bullet_feed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update archive===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[April 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[March 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[February 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Updates|Previous updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates</id>
		<title>Updates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T22:08:30Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you have anything which is not yet on the internet (e.g. court results or transcripts) then please send it in (see [[Help|Help page]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping up to date==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Email.jpg] You can now subscribe to free '''[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Email updates]''', on an occasional or monthly basis. &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Discussion http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Discussion.png] Join the new [[Discussion|email discussion list]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/t_mini-a.png] Receive updates as soon as they are added by following us on Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline @mhlonline]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/RSS.gif] Subscribe to the website's [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed RSS update feed]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/E-book_16x16.png] Receive monthly updates delivered automatically to your [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Kindle e-reader]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent updates on website==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bullet_feed title=&amp;quot;Mental Health Law Online Update RSS&amp;quot; desc=&amp;quot;What's new on the site&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (20): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|Re G (2012) EWCA Civ 431, (2012) MHLO 52}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (19): Section 139 case. {{pagesummary|DD v Durham County Council (2012) EWHC 1053 (QB), (2012) MHLO 51}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (18): Text of two Welsh Government updates added: 25/4/12 (Mental Health - Primary Care Referrals and Eligibility to Conduct Primary Care Assessments - Wales - Regulations 2012) and 24/4/12 (Laying of the Code of Practice to Parts 2 and 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010). See [[Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (17): Consultation on a Separate Legal Jurisdiction for Wales (27/3/12 to 19/6/12). The Welsh Government are consulting on making things even more unnecessarily complicated, by creating an entirely separate legal jurisdiction for Wales. See [[Consultations#Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (16): Martha Spurrier, 'The great safety net' (Solicitors Journal, 2/4/12). Reproduced by kind permission. See [[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (15): LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12). The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (14): Steve Doughty, 'Father of two with motor neurone disease wins right to die by blinking his eye after judge's landmark ruling' (Daily Mail, 1/5/12). See [[Settled cases and forthcoming judgments#Re XB (advance decision, Theis J)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (13): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Parkins (2012) EWCA Crim 856, (2012) MHLO 50}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (12): PI quantum case. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (11): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (10): PVS case. {{pagesummary|Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (9): Best interests case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (8): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (7): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (6): Simon Edwards, 'Capacity and tenancies/licences' (39 Essex Street, 19/4/12). See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (5): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 21, May 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP) — Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33 — Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP) — Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47 — Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48 — Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (4): Rosalind English, 'Delay in transferring mental health patient for treatment amounted to &amp;quot;inhumane treatment&amp;quot;' (3/5/12). This article concludes: 'This is a prime example of using Article 3 as a social and economic right, not a basic civil right, and thus extended leaves publicly funded authorities to carry out difficult jobs with threats of litigation looming on all sides. The UK courts recognised this claim for what it was, and dismissed it. Strasbourg should have done the same.' See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (3): Mental Health Cop Blog, 'MS v UK' (4/5/12). This article is in favour of the judgment and makes points in relation to (1) place of safety arguments, (2) accessing psychiatric beds, (3) media coverage, and (4) implications. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (2): ECtHR, 'Prolonged police detention of mentally-ill man without adequate medical care violated his Convention rights' (Press release ref ECHR 195 (2012), 3/5/12). This is the court's summary of the judgment. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (1): Article 3 case. {{pagesummary|MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/bullet_feed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update archive===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[April 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[March 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[February 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Updates|Previous updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Re_G_(2012)_EWCA_Civ_431,_(2012)_MHLO_52</id>
		<title>Re G (2012) EWCA Civ 431, (2012) MHLO 52</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Re_G_(2012)_EWCA_Civ_431,_(2012)_MHLO_52"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T22:07:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: Created page with &amp;quot;The local authority issued proceedings under the court's inherent jurisdiction in relation to a 30-year-old with Downs Syndrome history who was in the exclusive care of her mo...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The local authority issued proceedings under the court's inherent jurisdiction in relation to a 30-year-old with Downs Syndrome history who was in the exclusive care of her mother. This decision relates to an unsuccessful appeal against case management orders. [Summary required.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Transcript==&lt;br /&gt;
{{Transcript|Re G (2012) EWCA Civ 431, (2012) MHLO 52}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External link==&lt;br /&gt;
{{bailii|(2012) EWCA Civ 431|no}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Other capacity cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:No summary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Text:Transcript_of_Re_G_(2012)_EWCA_Civ_431,_(2012)_MHLO_52</id>
		<title>Text:Transcript of Re G (2012) EWCA Civ 431, (2012) MHLO 52</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Text:Transcript_of_Re_G_(2012)_EWCA_Civ_431,_(2012)_MHLO_52"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T22:01:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: Created page with &amp;quot;&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;text&amp;quot;&amp;gt; Case No: B4/2011/1932  Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWCA Civ 431   IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)   ON APPEAL FROM THE PRINCIPAL REGISTRY, FAMIL...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;div class=&amp;quot;text&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Case No: B4/2011/1932&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWCA Civ 431&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ON APPEAL FROM THE PRINCIPAL REGISTRY, FAMILY DIVISION&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(MRS JUSTICE PAUFFLEY)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Royal Courts of Justice&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Date: Friday 2nd March 2012&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LORD JUSTICE THORPE&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LORD JUSTICE GROSS&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
and&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MR JUSTICE RYDER&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
IN THE MATTER OF G (A CHILD)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(DAR Transcript of&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
WordWave International Limited&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A Merrill Communications Company&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
165 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2DY&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tel No:  020 7404 1400  Fax No: 020 7831 8838&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr Ian Wise QC and Ms Aswini Weereratne (instructed by Messrs Bhatia Best)&lt;br /&gt;
appeared on behalf of the Applicant mother.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ms Jenni Richards QC and Ms Victoria Butler Cole (instructed by Shropshire&lt;br /&gt;
County Council Legal Services Department) appeared on behalf of the First&lt;br /&gt;
Respondent, the local authority.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ms Lisa Giovanetti appeared on behalf of the Official Solicitor.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Third Respondent did not appear and was not represented.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Judgment&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
(As Approved by the Court)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Crown Copyright ©&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lord Justice Thorpe:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.     Proceedings were issued in the Family Division by the relevant local&lt;br /&gt;
authority on 12 May 2010.  They invoked the court's inherent jurisdiction to&lt;br /&gt;
make attempted orders in relation to a 30-year-old with Downs Syndrome history&lt;br /&gt;
who was in the exclusive care of her mother.  The proceedings were therefore&lt;br /&gt;
initially constituted between the local authority as applicant, the mother, and&lt;br /&gt;
a third respondent upon whom I need not dwell since he is not involved in this&lt;br /&gt;
application, albeit he remains a party to the proceedings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
2.     The application resulted in an order made on 12 May without notice by&lt;br /&gt;
Hogg J and I draw attention only to one paragraph of her order which was to this&lt;br /&gt;
effect:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;By 4pm on 17 June 2010 AG [the first defendant mother] and the 2nd defendant&lt;br /&gt;
have permission to file and serve witness statements explaining the basis on&lt;br /&gt;
which they assert that HG has given informed consent to the repeated publication&lt;br /&gt;
of details about her private life, sexual and medical history in meetings,&lt;br /&gt;
letters, emails, broadcasts and the internet.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
3.     The application issued by the local authority was supported by a&lt;br /&gt;
statement by the head of the community learning disability team and to his&lt;br /&gt;
statement he exhibited a historic psychiatric report on HG, a recent&lt;br /&gt;
psychological assessment on the papers, and a statement from the relevant social&lt;br /&gt;
worker in the case.  So all that evidence was there to support the local&lt;br /&gt;
authority's application and here at the earliest opportunity the court was not&lt;br /&gt;
directing the second and third respondents to file evidence but only encouraging&lt;br /&gt;
them to do so by the grant of that specific permission.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
4.     Nothing was done by the 17 June and so, when the matter returned on&lt;br /&gt;
notice before Pauffley J, the only evidence remained the evidence of the&lt;br /&gt;
applicants in support of that order.  The protection had been granted without&lt;br /&gt;
notice.  If it was to be set aside now was the opportunity to challenge and to&lt;br /&gt;
advance a contrary case supported by relevant evidence.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
5.     So it is hardly surprising to me that on 1 July Pauffley J extended the&lt;br /&gt;
protection, extended the injunctions which had been made without notice and&lt;br /&gt;
firmed up the obligation on the defendants to put in a contrary case.  So we see&lt;br /&gt;
within the order of the 1 July now not a permission but a direction:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;[The second respondent] shall file and serve a statement of evidence by 5&lt;br /&gt;
November 2010] relating to:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
a.     HG's history;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
b.     HG's activities and interests&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
c.     HG's involvement in the campaigns which are linked to her own history and&lt;br /&gt;
experiences;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6.     I also draw attention to the fact that the second defendant's consent to&lt;br /&gt;
a report on HG's capacity was conditional upon her having the freedom to bring&lt;br /&gt;
in the opinion of an expert of her own choosing and that condition is expressed&lt;br /&gt;
in paragraph 11 of the order which gave her permission to file and serve by 1&lt;br /&gt;
December a report by an independent psychologist on HG's capacity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
7.     So there was a case management order designed to carry the issue between&lt;br /&gt;
the local authority and the respondents towards conclusion with the orderly&lt;br /&gt;
preparation of a contrary case and with steps for the provision of expert&lt;br /&gt;
opinion on the important issue of HG's capacity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
8.     That order also gave leave to the issue of proceedings in the Court of&lt;br /&gt;
Protection.  There is here an interweaving of two jurisdictions.  The&lt;br /&gt;
jurisdiction of the Court of Protection arising under the Mental Capacity Act is&lt;br /&gt;
there for the protection of HG in the event that professional opinion&lt;br /&gt;
establishes that she lacks capacity.  If on the other hand she has capacity but&lt;br /&gt;
is nonetheless not only vulnerable but on the evidence prevented from reaching&lt;br /&gt;
independent decision by virtue of some vitiating factor, then it is for the same&lt;br /&gt;
court to protect her under its inherent jurisdiction.  The Court of Protection&lt;br /&gt;
proceedings were issued on 18 February 2011 but the progress that the order of&lt;br /&gt;
the 1 July was designed to achieve was simply frustrated by the disregard of the&lt;br /&gt;
provisions for the preparation of the evidence essential to enable the court to&lt;br /&gt;
try out the issues between the parties.  Accordingly on 11 May the Official&lt;br /&gt;
Solicitor wrote to the court to seek directions due to the failure of the&lt;br /&gt;
parties to agree on the identity of any expert.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
9.     So a date was fixed 14 June 2011 for a further hearing before Pauffley J.&lt;br /&gt;
On that occasion the identity of a suitable expert was not agreed.  The Official&lt;br /&gt;
Solicitor presented to the judge the extreme difficulty that he was facing in&lt;br /&gt;
finding an expert who was both suitably qualified and also willing and able to&lt;br /&gt;
undertake the instruction.  A Dr Baker, a pathologist, was advanced by the&lt;br /&gt;
Official Solicitor.  He was not agreed by the defendants but nonetheless he was&lt;br /&gt;
ordered by the judge at that hearing.  Again she extended the protection for HG&lt;br /&gt;
and extended the protective undertakings.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
10.     Now her order deserves more detailed examination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
11.     By paragraph 8 she recorded the permission to the Official Solicitor and&lt;br /&gt;
the applicant local authority to instruct Dr Baker to carry out an assessment of&lt;br /&gt;
and to report on HG's litigation and decision making capacity in accordance with&lt;br /&gt;
the draft letter of instructions within the bundle.  Paragraph 11 required that&lt;br /&gt;
report to be filed and served by 30 November 2011.  Equally if not more&lt;br /&gt;
important is paragraph 13 of the order which again requires the second defendant&lt;br /&gt;
by no later than 4pm on 30 July to file and serve a statement of evidence&lt;br /&gt;
relating to  the same issues, history, activities and interests and involvement&lt;br /&gt;
in campaigns.  Importantly the judge set a date for the trial.  In paragraph 15&lt;br /&gt;
she said the matter shall be listed for further hearing reserved to her if&lt;br /&gt;
available on the first open date after 7 December with a time estimate of one&lt;br /&gt;
day.   The order continues:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The hearing shall determine the issue of HG's capacity (in the event that there&lt;br /&gt;
is dispute over this issue) and directions sought by any party for the future&lt;br /&gt;
conduct of the proceedings.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
12.     Now what happened?  On 4 July the second respondent filed an appellant's&lt;br /&gt;
notice in this court seeking permission to appeal the order of 14 June 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
That was the application of the litigant in person and was listed for an oral&lt;br /&gt;
hearing before me alone on 27 October.  At that short hearing I directed that&lt;br /&gt;
the issues that the second respondent sought to ventilate should be listed for a&lt;br /&gt;
further oral hearing on notice with appeal to follow if permission granted.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
13.     It was clear to me that the consequence of that order was to enlarge the&lt;br /&gt;
prospects of the second respondent receiving public funding to enable her case&lt;br /&gt;
to be professionally presented.  Unfortunately the grant of public funding seems&lt;br /&gt;
to have been somewhat delayed and accordingly it is only within the last week or&lt;br /&gt;
so that Mr Ian Wise QC and his junior have been able to focus on the&lt;br /&gt;
professional presentation of the second respondent's case.  I would like to pay&lt;br /&gt;
tribute to the quality of the work which the team has produced over the last few&lt;br /&gt;
days.  Mr Wise has strategically extended the range of this permission&lt;br /&gt;
application to attack also the previous order of Pauffley J of 1 July.  There is&lt;br /&gt;
no appellant's notice related to that order but we do have amended grounds of&lt;br /&gt;
appeal.  In relation to the need for an extraordinary extension of time there is&lt;br /&gt;
no evidence but Mr Wise jointly adopted the suggestion that it was only because&lt;br /&gt;
the second respondent was so belatedly professionally represented that the&lt;br /&gt;
application was not sooner made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
14.     Mr Wise has produced a very erudite skeleton which he has developed&lt;br /&gt;
extremely skilfully.  He has drawn out arguments as to the basis of the exercise&lt;br /&gt;
of the inherent jurisdiction in interim cases and interim situations.  He has&lt;br /&gt;
emphasised the statutory language of the Mental Capacity Act which at crucial&lt;br /&gt;
points emphasises that the policy of the statute is to restrict the judicial&lt;br /&gt;
power and interference to the absolute minimum necessary to achieve protection&lt;br /&gt;
or other benefits.  He has repeatedly characterised the orders made by Pauffley&lt;br /&gt;
J as being paternalistic, as being reasoned only on the inadequate consideration&lt;br /&gt;
of HG's conceded vulnerability.  He has repeatedly stigmatised the local&lt;br /&gt;
authority's evidence as having failed to demonstrate any of the vitiating&lt;br /&gt;
factors, such as coercion or undue influence, which would justify the&lt;br /&gt;
interference under the inherent jurisdiction and the imposition of restrictive&lt;br /&gt;
injunctions.  Equally he has emphasised that evidence as to HG's lack of&lt;br /&gt;
capacity is absent or at best scant.  He has said that the statements exhibited&lt;br /&gt;
to Mr Johnson's affidavit are if anything contradictory and he has emphasised&lt;br /&gt;
that the burden is throughout on the local authority to prove its case and that&lt;br /&gt;
the assumption is always in favour of capacity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
15.     All that is properly advanced on behalf of the second appellant and it&lt;br /&gt;
may well be that there is a case that this court will have to consider in due&lt;br /&gt;
course once the proceedings have developed to a stage which could be&lt;br /&gt;
characterised as a trial, a proper investigation of the issues that are&lt;br /&gt;
apparently live between the parties.  But it cannot be overemphasised that the&lt;br /&gt;
attack is directed to case management orders.  All that the judge has done has&lt;br /&gt;
been to seek to bring the issues between the parties to trial.  Why have they&lt;br /&gt;
not advanced?  Because the judicial intention has been frustrated by the lack of&lt;br /&gt;
collaboration, the lack of cooperation, the disregard of court orders on the&lt;br /&gt;
part of the applicant.  There is also a suggestion that most recently she has&lt;br /&gt;
frustrated the preparation of the report ordered by Dr Baker by not cooperating&lt;br /&gt;
in practical arrangements for meetings between Dr Baker and HG.  The Official&lt;br /&gt;
Solicitor has produced a letter which clearly requires some response and the&lt;br /&gt;
response is: well, the letter was never received.  That may be the case but that&lt;br /&gt;
is something that would be required to be investigated at a trial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
16.     In situations like this, where on three specific occasions invitations&lt;br /&gt;
or orders for the production of a contrary case have been ignored, the trial&lt;br /&gt;
judge is entitled to draw inferences that there may be an ever increasing need&lt;br /&gt;
for judicial investigation into the reality.  The greater the need for&lt;br /&gt;
investigation the greater the need for caution in the interim.  Not to impose&lt;br /&gt;
protection, in perhaps regard for assumptions which would otherwise be made as&lt;br /&gt;
to capacity and as to good faith, only expose the admittedly vulnerable adult to&lt;br /&gt;
an unnecessary risk.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
17.     I am in no doubt at all in my mind that everything that has been done by&lt;br /&gt;
the judge is jurisdictionally sound, is within the exercise of a broad&lt;br /&gt;
discretion and certainly provides no obligation, no necessity on this court to&lt;br /&gt;
interfere in a way which would only extend the very regrettable delay in the&lt;br /&gt;
investigation and conclusion of material issues.  The sooner that this court&lt;br /&gt;
pronounces on the applications before it the sooner the case can resume its&lt;br /&gt;
impetus in the court of trial.  What is clearly needed is a very early&lt;br /&gt;
directions point when the judge can address the failure to file evidence by 30&lt;br /&gt;
July, the failure to file the expert report by 11 November and the loss of the&lt;br /&gt;
fixture on the first open date after the 7 December.  I would not extend time in&lt;br /&gt;
relation to the shadowy attack on the order of the 1 July 2010 and I would&lt;br /&gt;
refuse the application for permission to appeal the order of 14 June 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lord Justice Gross:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
18.     I agree&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mr Justice Ryder:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
19.     I also agree.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Order: Application refused&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates</id>
		<title>Updates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T21:48:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: /* Recent updates on website */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you have anything which is not yet on the internet (e.g. court results or transcripts) then please send it in (see [[Help|Help page]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping up to date==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Email.jpg] You can now subscribe to free '''[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Email updates]''', on an occasional or monthly basis. &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Discussion http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Discussion.png] Join the new [[Discussion|email discussion list]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/t_mini-a.png] Receive updates as soon as they are added by following us on Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline @mhlonline]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/RSS.gif] Subscribe to the website's [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed RSS update feed]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/E-book_16x16.png] Receive monthly updates delivered automatically to your [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Kindle e-reader]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent updates on website==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bullet_feed title=&amp;quot;Mental Health Law Online Update RSS&amp;quot; desc=&amp;quot;What's new on the site&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (19): Section 139 case. {{pagesummary|DD v Durham County Council (2012) EWHC 1053 (QB), (2012) MHLO 51}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (18): Text of two Welsh Government updates added: 25/4/12 (Mental Health - Primary Care Referrals and Eligibility to Conduct Primary Care Assessments - Wales - Regulations 2012) and 24/4/12 (Laying of the Code of Practice to Parts 2 and 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010). See [[Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (17): Consultation on a Separate Legal Jurisdiction for Wales (27/3/12 to 19/6/12). The Welsh Government are consulting on making things even more unnecessarily complicated, by creating an entirely separate legal jurisdiction for Wales. See [[Consultations#Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (16): Martha Spurrier, 'The great safety net' (Solicitors Journal, 2/4/12). Reproduced by kind permission. See [[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (15): LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12). The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (14): Steve Doughty, 'Father of two with motor neurone disease wins right to die by blinking his eye after judge's landmark ruling' (Daily Mail, 1/5/12). See [[Settled cases and forthcoming judgments#Re XB (advance decision, Theis J)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (13): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Parkins (2012) EWCA Crim 856, (2012) MHLO 50}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (12): PI quantum case. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (11): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (10): PVS case. {{pagesummary|Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (9): Best interests case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (8): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (7): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (6): Simon Edwards, 'Capacity and tenancies/licences' (39 Essex Street, 19/4/12). See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (5): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 21, May 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP) — Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33 — Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP) — Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47 — Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48 — Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (4): Rosalind English, 'Delay in transferring mental health patient for treatment amounted to &amp;quot;inhumane treatment&amp;quot;' (3/5/12). This article concludes: 'This is a prime example of using Article 3 as a social and economic right, not a basic civil right, and thus extended leaves publicly funded authorities to carry out difficult jobs with threats of litigation looming on all sides. The UK courts recognised this claim for what it was, and dismissed it. Strasbourg should have done the same.' See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (3): Mental Health Cop Blog, 'MS v UK' (4/5/12). This article is in favour of the judgment and makes points in relation to (1) place of safety arguments, (2) accessing psychiatric beds, (3) media coverage, and (4) implications. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (2): ECtHR, 'Prolonged police detention of mentally-ill man without adequate medical care violated his Convention rights' (Press release ref ECHR 195 (2012), 3/5/12). This is the court's summary of the judgment. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (1): Article 3 case. {{pagesummary|MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/bullet_feed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update archive===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[April 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[March 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[February 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Updates|Previous updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/DD_v_Durham_County_Council_(2012)_EWHC_1053_(QB),_(2012)_MHLO_51</id>
		<title>DD v Durham County Council (2012) EWHC 1053 (QB), (2012) MHLO 51</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/DD_v_Durham_County_Council_(2012)_EWHC_1053_(QB),_(2012)_MHLO_51"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T21:47:43Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: Created page with &amp;quot;''The claimant was gate sectioned at Durham prison and detained under s2, then s3, in a Middlesborough hospital. He had complaints of false imprisonment and breaches o...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''The claimant was gate sectioned at Durham prison and detained under [[s2]], then [[s3]], in a Middlesborough hospital. He had complaints of false imprisonment and breaches of [[Article 3]] and [[Article 8|8]] relating to matters such as his being kept in seclusion, the lighting in his room, the number of people supervising his activities and a general lack of privacy. (1) He needed leave under [[s139]] to bring civil proceedings against Durham County Council and Middlesborough City Council. This was refused: there was no realistic prospect of establishing illegality against the AMHPs who made the recommendations for s2 and s3 as AMHPs are (a) not required to choose or investigate the quality of the place of detention, (b) not required to research medical views earlier than those in the statutory recommendations, (c) not responsible for the medical or other regimes to which a detained person is subjected. (2) The AMHP who applied for s3 detention was employed by Middlesborough, so Durham claimed that Middlesborough would be vicariously liable. This was incorrect: Durham would have been liable for any wrongdoing, because vicarious liability arises not as a result of employment law but through the statutory relationship in [[s13]].''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
Judgment: 24/4/12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hearing: 27/3/12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Before: Eady J&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Christopher Buttler (instructed by Scott-Moncrieff &amp;amp; Associates LLP) for the Claimant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
John Norman (instructed by DWF LLP) for the First Defendant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Patrick Limb QC (instructed by Berrymans Lace Mawer LLP) for the Second Defendant&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External link==&lt;br /&gt;
{{bailii|(2012) EWHC 1053 (QB)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Miscellaneous]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Brief summary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates</id>
		<title>Updates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T21:02:44Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you have anything which is not yet on the internet (e.g. court results or transcripts) then please send it in (see [[Help|Help page]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping up to date==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Email.jpg] You can now subscribe to free '''[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Email updates]''', on an occasional or monthly basis. &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Discussion http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Discussion.png] Join the new [[Discussion|email discussion list]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/t_mini-a.png] Receive updates as soon as they are added by following us on Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline @mhlonline]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/RSS.gif] Subscribe to the website's [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed RSS update feed]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/E-book_16x16.png] Receive monthly updates delivered automatically to your [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Kindle e-reader]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent updates on website==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bullet_feed title=&amp;quot;Mental Health Law Online Update RSS&amp;quot; desc=&amp;quot;What's new on the site&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (18): Text of two Welsh Government updates added: 25/4/12 (Mental Health - Primary Care Referrals and Eligibility to Conduct Primary Care Assessments - Wales - Regulations 2012) and 24/4/12 (Laying of the Code of Practice to Parts 2 and 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010). See [[Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (17): Consultation on a Separate Legal Jurisdiction for Wales (27/3/12 to 19/6/12). The Welsh Government are consulting on making things even more unnecessarily complicated, by creating an entirely separate legal jurisdiction for Wales. See [[Consultations#Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (16): Martha Spurrier, 'The great safety net' (Solicitors Journal, 2/4/12). Reproduced by kind permission. See [[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (15): LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12). The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (14): Steve Doughty, 'Father of two with motor neurone disease wins right to die by blinking his eye after judge's landmark ruling' (Daily Mail, 1/5/12). See [[Settled cases and forthcoming judgments#Re XB (advance decision, Theis J)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (13): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Parkins (2012) EWCA Crim 856, (2012) MHLO 50}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (12): PI quantum case. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (11): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (10): PVS case. {{pagesummary|Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (9): Best interests case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (8): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (7): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (6): Simon Edwards, 'Capacity and tenancies/licences' (39 Essex Street, 19/4/12). See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (5): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 21, May 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP) — Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33 — Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP) — Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47 — Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48 — Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (4): Rosalind English, 'Delay in transferring mental health patient for treatment amounted to &amp;quot;inhumane treatment&amp;quot;' (3/5/12). This article concludes: 'This is a prime example of using Article 3 as a social and economic right, not a basic civil right, and thus extended leaves publicly funded authorities to carry out difficult jobs with threats of litigation looming on all sides. The UK courts recognised this claim for what it was, and dismissed it. Strasbourg should have done the same.' See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (3): Mental Health Cop Blog, 'MS v UK' (4/5/12). This article is in favour of the judgment and makes points in relation to (1) place of safety arguments, (2) accessing psychiatric beds, (3) media coverage, and (4) implications. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (2): ECtHR, 'Prolonged police detention of mentally-ill man without adequate medical care violated his Convention rights' (Press release ref ECHR 195 (2012), 3/5/12). This is the court's summary of the judgment. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (1): Article 3 case. {{pagesummary|MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/bullet_feed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update archive===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[April 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[March 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[February 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Updates|Previous updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates</id>
		<title>Updates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T21:02:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you have anything which is not yet on the internet (e.g. court results or transcripts) then please send it in (see [[Help|Help page]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping up to date==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Email.jpg] You can now subscribe to free '''[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Email updates]''', on an occasional or monthly basis. &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Discussion http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Discussion.png] Join the new [[Discussion|email discussion list]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/t_mini-a.png] Receive updates as soon as they are added by following us on Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline @mhlonline]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/RSS.gif] Subscribe to the website's [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed RSS update feed]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/E-book_16x16.png] Receive monthly updates delivered automatically to your [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Kindle e-reader]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent updates on website==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bullet_feed title=&amp;quot;Mental Health Law Online Update RSS&amp;quot; desc=&amp;quot;What's new on the site&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (18): Text of two Welsh Government updates added: 25/4/12 (Mental Health - Primary Care Referrals and Eligibility to Conduct Primary Care Assessments - Wales - Regulations 2012) and 24/4/12 (Laying of the Code of Practice to Parts 2 and 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010). See [[Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (17): Consultation on a Separate Legal Jurisdiction for Wales (27/3/12 to 19/6/12). The Welsh Government are consulting on making things even more unnecessarily complicated, by creating an entirely separate legal jurisdiction for Wales. See [[Consultations#Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (16): Martha Spurrier, 'The great safety net' (Solicitors Journal, 2/4/12). Reproduced by kind permission. See [[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (15): LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12). The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (14): Steve Doughty, 'Father of two with motor neurone disease wins right to die by blinking his eye after judge's landmark ruling' (Daily Mail, 1/5/12). See [[Settled cases and forthcoming judgments#Re XB (advance decision, Theis J)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (13): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Parkins (2012) EWCA Crim 856, (2012) MHLO 50}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (12): PI quantum case. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (11): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (10): PVS case. {{pagesummary|Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (9): Best interests case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (8): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (7): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (6): Simon Edwards, 'Capacity and tenancies/licences' (39 Essex Street, 19/4/12). See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (5): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 21, May 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP) — Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33 — Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP) — Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47 — Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48 — Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (4): Rosalind English, 'Delay in transferring mental health patient for treatment amounted to &amp;quot;inhumane treatment&amp;quot;' (3/5/12). This article concludes: 'This is a prime example of using Article 3 as a social and economic right, not a basic civil right, and thus extended leaves publicly funded authorities to carry out difficult jobs with threats of litigation looming on all sides. The UK courts recognised this claim for what it was, and dismissed it. Strasbourg should have done the same.' See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (3): Mental Health Cop Blog, 'MS v UK' (4/5/12). This article is in favour of the judgment and makes points in relation to (1) place of safety arguments, (2) accessing psychiatric beds, (3) media coverage, and (4) implications. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (2): ECtHR, 'Prolonged police detention of mentally-ill man without adequate medical care violated his Convention rights' (Press release ref ECHR 195 (2012), 3/5/12). This is the court's summary of the judgment. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (1): Article 3 case. {{pagesummary|MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (25): Westminster Hall debate on Litigation Friends (HC Deb, 21 March 2012, c244WH). See [[Official Solicitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (24): Irwin Mitchell Solicitors, 'Mother Proved Right As Son Freed From Padded Room Hell Makes Progress' (29/3/12). 'Court Anonymity Order Lifted Naming Wigan Borough Council As Local Authority Which Locked Up Her Autistic Son.' See [[Re C; C v Wigan Borough Council (2011) EWHC 1539 (Admin)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (23): HMCTS, 'Mental Health Tribunal Stakeholder Bulletin April 2012' (17/4/12). The following are the headings: Contacting the Tribunal; Reports Processing Team; Section 2 Cases; Scanned Reports; Password protection; Notification to the Tribunal of Patient Withdrawals and RC Discharges; HQ2 Questionnaire; FTT Mental Health Policy update; Clerking; Facilities for the Hearing impaired; Olympics and Paralympics 2012 and the potential impact; Relist Team; Customer Survey; Feedback. In relation to the new forms: '''Form CNL2''' ('Case Notification Letter 2'), which from May 2012 will be sent to the representative with the RC's report, demands that the representative complete '''Form HQ2''' ('Hearing Questionnaire 2'). HQ2 asks the following questions: (1) What is the Patient seeking from the tribunal, and what are the principal areas of dispute? (2) Do you intend to call an independent expert? If so, please give details. (3) What is your hearing time estimate? (4) Would this case benefit from pre-hearing review by a tribunal judge? If so, please say why (e.g. change of status under the Act, or recent hospital transfer). (5) Are there any other matters that you feel that the panel should know in order to dispose of this matter justly, fairly and without delay? (6) Does the patient need an interpreter? If so, please give details of language and dialect. See [[Mental Health Tribunal#Tribunal member and stakeholder email bulletin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (22): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 20, April 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: Austin v UK 39692/09 [2012] ECHR 459, [2012] MHLO 22, DD v Lithuania 13469/06 [2012] ECHR 254, [2012] MHLO 29, DL v A Local Authority [2012] EWCA Civ 253, [2012] MHLO 32, Long v Rodman [2012] EWHC 347 (Ch), [2012] MHLO 12, ZH v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 604 (QB), [2012] MHLO 25, Seaton v Seddon [2012] EWHC 735 (Ch), [2012] MHLO 28, Coombs v Dorset NHS PCT [2012] EWHC 521 (QB), [2012] MHLO 13. Also mentioned are: CQC report on DOLS; Listing Deprivation of Liberty Safeguarding cases; COP Cases Online and all previous newsletters in one PDF document. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (21): LPA case. {{pagesummary|Re Drew (2012) MHLO 45 (LPA)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (20): LPA case. {{pagesummary|Re Bloom (2012) MHLO 44 (LPA)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (19): LPA case. {{pagesummary|Re Batchelor (2012) MHLO 43 (LPA)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (18): CQC, 'CQC inspector dismissed for gross misconduct' (27/4/12). 'A CQC inspector has been dismissed for gross misconduct after an internal investigation revealed that the impartiality of their regulatory judgements had been seriously compromised. This came to light as a result of whistle-blowing information to the CQC. No additional detail can be provided as CQC has now referred this matter to the police.' See [[CQC]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (17): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v B (2012) EWCA Crim 770, (2012) MHLO 42}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (16): Immigration appeal with mental health aspect. {{pagesummary|R (HA (Nigeria)) v SSHD (2012) EWHC 979 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 41}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (15): Sentence appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Ahmed (2012) EWCA Crim 708, (2012) MHLO 40}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (14): Costs. {{pagesummary|R (Sutton) v Calderdale Council (2012) EWHC 637 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 39}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (13): Immigration appeal with mental health aspect. {{pagesummary|MM (Zimbabwe) v SSHD (2012) EWCA Civ 279, (2012) MHLO 38}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (12): Extradition case with mental health aspect. {{pagesummary|Republic of South Africa v Dewani (2012) EWHC 842 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 37}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (11): Southern Irish case. {{pagesummary|L v Clinical Director of St Patrick's University Hospital (2012) IEHC 15, (2012) MHLO 36}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (10): Southern Irish case from 2008. {{pagesummary|Han v President of the Circuit Court (2008) IEHC 160}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (9): HMCTS, 'T128: Options for your Tribunal Referral Hearing: Community Patients' (April 2012). This is the form which is sent to CTO patients inviting them to cancel their tribunal referral hearings. See [[Tribunal Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (8): New caselaw category. See [[:Category:Statutory will cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (7): Statutory will case. {{pagesummary|Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Barbara Rich of 5 Stone Buildings&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (6): Updated guidance. HMCTS, 'Room Specification Recommendations for Tribunal Hearings' (March 2012). See [[Mental Health Tribunal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (5): The LSC is consulting on their proposal to discontinue funding for the Specialist Support Service, as a result of conceding a judicial review of their decision to do so. The consultation runs until 11/5/12. The specialist support service for mental health is run by Scott Moncrieff Solicitors, and is available from Monday to Friday, 10am to 4pm, on 0844 800 3364. Related articles: Legal Aid Handbook Blog, 'LSC concede judicial review; specialist support reprieved' (1/3/12); Legal Aid Handbook Blog, 'Weekly round up' (1/4/12). See [[Consultations#Legal Services Commission]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (4): Sentence appeal case. {{pagesummary|R v Levey (2012) EWCA Crim 657, (2012) MHLO 34}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (3): Capacity/PI case. {{pagesummary|Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (2): Southern Irish case. {{pagesummary|Re JO'B; HSE v JO'B (2011) IEHC 73}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (1): Mind, 'Legal enewsletter' (Issue 11, April 2012). This newsletter contains: (1) Articles: (a) Making best interests decisions under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, (b) Listening to experience - Mind's report into acute and crisis mental healthcare, (c) The right to life under Article 2 of the ECHR, (d) The right to independent living - is it working?; (2) Case reports: (a) SSJ v RB (2011) EWCA Civ 1608, (b) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257, (c) O'Cathail v Transport for London (2012) EWCA Civ 92; (3) Updates: (a) Discrimination news, (b) Section 117 MHA 1983 and the Health and Social Care Bill 2012, (c) Changes to mental health tribunal rules and procedure, (d) Care Quality Commission, (e) Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CPID) Toolkit, (e) Proposed DVLA changes: fitness to drive, (f) Court of Protection. See [[Mind (Charity)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*26/04/12 (2): Turning Point, a health and social care charity, has an opportunity for a part-time Mental Health Act Administrator (22.5 hours) at a new 28-person Independent Hospital in Mastin Moor, Chesterfield. The closing date for applications is 10/5/12. See [https://turningpoint.ppsworks.co.uk/apply/index1.php?online_ref=31Dl34M6 Turning Point website] for details and to apply. See [[Jobs]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*26/04/12 (1): New COP Practice Direction. {{pagesummary|COP Practice Direction: Preparation of Bundles}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*25/04/12 (1): The Mental Health Lawyers Association will be running their successful two-day course for membership of the Law Society's Mental Health Accreditation Scheme (formerly the MHRT panel) in Leeds on Monday 18/6/12 and Tuesday 19/6/12. Price: £300 (members); £390 (non-members); £250 (for third and subsequent members in a group). CPD: 12 SRA-accredited hours. See MHLA website for further details and booking form. See [[Events]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*24/04/12 (2): {{pagesummary|Health and Social Care Act 2012}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*24/04/12 (1): {{pagesummary|Mental Health (Hospital, Guardianship and Treatment) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2012}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*19/04/12 (2): Please subscribe to Mental Health Law Online's new discussion list. This is separate from the email updates list, which remains unchanged. The discussion list will cover all aspects of mental health law in England and Wales, from the Mental Health Act 1983 and the Mental Health Tribunal, to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Court of Protection. See [[Discussion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*19/04/12 (1): Mental Health Law Online is six years old today! Many thanks to all readers, contributors and subscribers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*18/04/12 (2): Legal Action articles on the required content of social circumstances reports and responsible authority statements, reproduced by kind permission: (1) Christopher Curran, Malcolm Golightley and Phil Fennell, 'Social circumstances reports for mental health tribunals - Part 1' (Legal Action, June 2010); (2) Christopher Curran, Malcolm Golightley and Phil Fennell, 'Social circumstances reports for mental health tribunals - Part 1' (Legal Action, July 2010); (3) Christopher Curran, Phil Fennell and Simon Burrows, 'Responsible authority statements for mental health tribunals' (Legal Action, March 2012). See [[Tribunal Rules]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*18/04/12 (1): David Hewitt, 'Purpose alone can no longer determine if there is a deprivation of liberty' (Solicitors Journal, 16/4/12). This article argues that the reference in the Court of Appeal decision in Cheshire West to 'purpose' as being relevant to the objective element of deprivation of liberty is not supported by the subsequent ECtHR decision in Austin. See [[Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (4): New version. {{pagesummary|Guidance Booklet: Reports for Mental Health Tribunals}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (3): Mark Hinchliffe, 'Important Notice' (29/3/12). This document describes the changes made by the [[Tribunal Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2012]] on 6/4/12. In relation to the tribunal's requirement, in CTO reference cases, for evidence from the RC about the patient's capacity to decide not to attend or be represented, it states: 'We do not see that this should present a difficulty or a conflict of interest. The Responsible Clinician, as an expert witness, has no &amp;quot;interest&amp;quot; one way or the other and, in any event, has a responsibility to assess capacity in many situations...' See [[Mental Health Tribunal#Messages from Deputy Chamber President]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (2): New Practice Direction on reports. {{pagesummary|Practice Direction: First-tier Tribunal Health Education and Social Care Chamber: Statements and Reports in Mental Health Cases}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (1): LSC, 'New Keycard 48 to be introduced from 9 April' (5/4/12). Keycard 48 reflects an increase in the standard dependants' allowances assessed for a partner or child living within the client's household; the new rates are applicable to new applications or further assessments made on or after 9 April 2012. Eligibility limits are unchanged. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*06/04/12 (1): Case (detained patient paying for treatment): transcript and neutral citation now available. {{pagesummary|Coombs v Dorset NHS PCT (2012) EWHC 521 (QB), (2012) MHLO 13}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/04/12 (1): The following was asked on a discussion page on 2/4/12. 'Does anyone know: if a CTO inadvertently lapses (i.e. is not renewed by accident) does the original section 3 which the CTO was suspending come back into being? I know if you discharge someone from the CTO that discharges from the section 3. If you revoke the CTO then the Section 3 will come back into being. But if the CTO just lapses does that also mean that the Section 3 that was suspended has lapsed by default as well? I don't know the answer but if anyone does that would be really helpful. Thanks'. The answer is that when the CTO expires the s3 ceases to have effect: see [[s20B]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*01/04/12 (1): The government have announced that from 1 April 2012, following the Court of Appeal decision in [[Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257]] and the subsequent High Court decision in [[Re C; C v Blackburn and Darwen Borough Council (2011) EWHC 3321 (COP)]], the entire Mental Health Act 1983 will be repealed. The government spokesman, Avril Poisson, said: “Those subject to the Act lack capacity, as demonstrated by their inability to comply with voluntary inpatient treatment, and they should be treated equally to others who lack capacity. Recent case law on deprivation of liberty has shown that the relevant contrast when assessing ‘relative normality’ is not ‘the ordinary adult going about the kind of life which the able-bodied man or woman on the Clapham omnibus would normally expect to lead’ but rather ‘the kind of lives that people like X would normally expect to lead’ (Cheshire West, para 102). Periods of hospital inpatient treatment are normal, as an inevitable corollary of psychiatric disabilities: during those periods there are no realistic alternatives and no deprivation of liberty within the meaning of [[Article 5]] of the European Convention.” She said that the 29-year-old Act would be abolished with immediate effect because it is no longer fit for purpose, and that the “so-called” deprivation of liberty safeguards would also come under scrutiny. “When I use a word,” she said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” '''[Hope you enjoyed the April Fools' Day joke!]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*30/03/12 (1): The March 2012 CPD questionnaire is now online. Obtain 12 accredited CPD points for £60. See [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/cpd/ CPD scheme]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (6): CQC, 'The operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in England, 2010/11' (March 2012). Key findings: '(1) 8,982 applications to deprive a person of their liberty were processed, of which 50 per cent were authorised. (2) Many services have developed good practice on the use of the safeguards, especially in involving people and their families in the decision-making process, but some were confused as to when restraints or restrictions on a person amounted to a deprivation of liberty. (3) Between a third and a quarter of care homes had not provided their staff with training on the safeguards, and in some cases only the manager had received training. (4) Most hospitals had held some training, but the proportion of staff involved ranged between 20-100 per cent.' See also: CQC, 'Summary: The operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in England, 2010/11' (March 2012); Lucy Series, 'CQC's second monitoring report on the deprivation of liberty safeguards' (Small Places blog, 27/3/12). See [[CQC]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (5): LSC, 'Accreditation contribution scheme update' (28/3/12). From 2/4/12 the LSC will reduce the amount it contributes to the costs of mental health panel membership by 50% to £73.44; from 1/4/13 there will be no contribution at all. In recent weeks the Law Society's accreditation fees doubled to £500 plus VAT. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (4): Case transcript. {{pagesummary|A London Borough v VT (2011) EWHC 3806 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (3): Case transcript. {{pagesummary|EB v RC (2011) EWHC 3805 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (2): Neutral citation available. {{pagesummary|Re JDS; KGS v JDS (2012) EWHC 302 (COP), (2012) MHLO 4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (1): Case summary. {{pagesummary|DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/bullet_feed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update archive===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[March 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[February 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[January 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Updates|Previous updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Mental_Health_(Wales)_Measure_2010</id>
		<title>Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Mental_Health_(Wales)_Measure_2010"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T21:00:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Preamble: 'A Measure of the National Assembly for Wales to make provision about primary mental health support services; the coordination of and planning for secondary mental health services; assessments of the needs of former users of secondary mental health services; independent advocacy for persons detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 and other persons who are receiving in-patient hospital treatment for mental health; and for connected purposes. This Measure, passed by the National Assembly for Wales on 2 November 2010 and approved by Her Majesty in Council on 15 December 2010, enacts the following provisions...'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Consultations]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Update emails==&lt;br /&gt;
The text of these circular emails is reproduced below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===25/4/12: Mental Health - Primary Care Referrals and Eligibility to Conduct Primary Care Assessments - Wales - Regulations 2012===&lt;br /&gt;
Please note that the draft Mental Health (Primary Care Referrals and Eligibility to Conduct Primary Care Assessments) (Wales) Regulations 2012 have been laid in the National Assembly for Wales.  They are due to be debated in the Plenary session of the Assembly on 15 May 2012.  A copy of the Regulations can be accessed here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.assemblywales.org/bus-home/bus-business-fourth-assembly-laid-docs.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The summary of consultation responses to the consultation exercise which was carried out on the draft Regulations has been published.  It can be accessed here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://wales.gov.uk/consultations/healthsocialcare/regulation2012/?lang=en&amp;amp;status=closed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Please address any enquiries to mentalhealthpolicymailbox@wales.gsi.gov.uk &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===24/4/12: Laying of the Code of Practice to Parts 2 and 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010===&lt;br /&gt;
The Code of Practice to Parts 2 and 3 of the Mental health (Wales) Measure 2010 was laid yesterday, 23rd of April, before the National Assembly for Wales in accordance with the requirements of section 44 of the Measure.  The following is a link to the Documents Laid page of the National Assembly for Wales website where the Code can be found;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.assemblywales.org/bus-home/bus-business-fourth-assembly-laid-docs.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Provided that a resolution is not raised in the Assembly for it's withdrawal during a period of 40 non recess days then the Code will be published and will be in force when Parts 2 and 3 of the Measure commence on the 6th of June 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am now leaving the Welsh Government and the Mental Health Legislation team has ceased to be with this area of work now sitting within Mental Health and Vulnerable Groups policy branch. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any queries regarding the Code, the Measure or any of the regulations please contact:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
mentalhealthandvulnerablegroups@wales.gsi.gov.uk &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===16/1/12: Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010 - Care and Treatment Plan template===&lt;br /&gt;
Further to the emails below, please find attached Welsh and English language versions of the Care and Treatment Plan template which was agreed by the National Assembly for Wales in December 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From 6 June 2012 mental health services in Wales will be required to deliver the care coordination and care and treatment planning provisions of Part 2 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010 and the [[Mental Health (Care Co-ordination and Care and Treatment Planning) (Wales) Regulations 2011]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Care and Treatment Plan templates attached here meet the requirements of this legislation: &lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;Care and Treatment Plan template Welsh Jan 12.doc&amp;gt;&amp;gt;  &amp;lt;&amp;lt;[[Media:Wales Care and Treatment Plan template English Jan 12.doc|Care and Treatment Plan template English Jan 12.doc]]&amp;gt;&amp;gt; [Welsh version not reproduced on MHLO.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any queries in relation to this email, please contact the Welsh Government's Mental Health Legislation Team at mentalhealthlegislation@wales.gsi.gov.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===11/11/11===&lt;br /&gt;
On Tuesday 8 November 2011 the Minister for Health and Social Services laid before the National Assembly for Wales the Mental Health (Care Coordination and Care and Treatment Planning) (Wales) Regulations 2011 along with an accompanying Explanatory Memorandum.  These Regulations are being introduced under Part 2 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Regulations can be accessed via the attached hyperlinks: &lt;br /&gt;
English &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.assemblywales.org/bus-home/bus-business-fourth-assembly-laid-docs.htm?act=dis&amp;amp;id=225852&amp;amp;ds=11/2011 &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.assemblywales.org/bus-home/bus-business-fourth-assembly-laid-docs.htm?act=dis&amp;amp;id=225855&amp;amp;ds=11/2011 &lt;br /&gt;
Welsh &lt;br /&gt;
http://www.assemblywales.org/cy/bus-home/bus-business-fourth-assembly-laid-docs.htm?act=dis&amp;amp;id=225852&amp;amp;ds=11/2011 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These Regulations have been scheduled for debate by Assembly Members in the Senedd on Tuesday 29 November 2011. &lt;br /&gt;
A formal consultation process took place in relation to these Regulations earlier in the year, and the consultation response report from this exercise can be accessed via the attached hyperlink:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://wales.gov.uk/consultations/healthsocialcare/care/?lang=en&amp;amp;status=closed &lt;br /&gt;
The report contains a copy of the revised Care and Treatment Plan template which the legislation requires services to adopt from June 2012 (if these Regulations are agreed by the National Assembly).  The Care and Treatment Plan template will be appended to the final version of the Code of Practice to Parts 2 and 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010 when this is published in early 2012.  In the meantime, copies of the template in English and Welsh are attached here for ease of reference:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;&amp;lt;Care and Treatment Plan template as at 30 Sept 2011.doc&amp;gt;&amp;gt; &amp;lt;&amp;lt;Care &amp;amp; Treatment plan template W as at 25 10 11.doc&amp;gt;&amp;gt; [Not reproduced on MHLO]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you require any further information on the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010, please contact the Welsh Government's Mental Health Legislation Team at: mentalhealthlegislation@wales.gsi.gov.uk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===8/11/11===&lt;br /&gt;
On 7 November 2011 the Welsh Government began a formal consultation on the draft [[Mental Health (Primary Care Referrals and Eligibility to Conduct Primary Mental Health Assessments) (Wales) Regulations 2012]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These Regulations propose arrangements which will enable GPs to refer individuals to local primary mental health support services (including individuals who are not registered with them).  The Regulations also set out eligibility requirements for those who may undertake primary mental health assessments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The consultation period begins on 7 November 2011 and all responses must be submitted to the Welsh Government's Mental Health Legislation Team no later than 27 January 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A hyperlink to the draft Regulations and consultation document is attached here: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://wales.gov.uk/consultations/healthsocialcare/regulation2012/?lang=en &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Welsh Government is undertaking a series of public events across Wales in support of this consultation.  Invitations to these events were circulated previously.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you require any further information on these draft Regulations, the forthcoming consultation events, or the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010 more generally, please contact: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
mentalhealthlegislation@wales.gsi.gov.uk &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===26/10/11===&lt;br /&gt;
On Tuesday 18 October 2011 the National Assembly for Wales debated and approved two sets of Regulations associated with the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010: the [[Mental Health (Assessment of Former Users of Secondary Mental Health Services) (Wales) Regulations 2011]] and the [[Mental Health (Independent Mental Health Advocates) (Wales) Regulations 2011]], along with accompanying Explanatory Memoranda and Regulatory Impact Assessments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Mental Health (Independent Mental Health Advocates) (Wales) Regulations 2011 will come into force insofar as they relate to Welsh qualifying informal patients on 2 April 2012, and for all other purposes on 3 January 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Mental Health (Assessment of Former Users of Secondary Mental Health Services) (Wales) Regulations 2011 will come into force on 6 June 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transcript of the debate and copies of the Regulations and accompanying Explanatory Memoranda can be accessed via the attached links:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.assemblywales.org/bus-home/bus-chamber-fourth-assembly-rop.htm?act=dis&amp;amp;id=224338&amp;amp;ds=10%2F2011#cyn2 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.assemblywales.org/bus-home/bus-business-fourth-assembly-laid-docs.htm?act=dis&amp;amp;id=221838&amp;amp;ds=9/2011 &lt;br /&gt;
SUB-LD8672-EM - The Mental Health (Assessment of Former Users of Secondary Mental Health Services) (Wales) Regulations 2011 - Explanatory Memorandum &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.assemblywales.org/bus-home/bus-business-fourth-assembly-laid-docs.htm?act=dis&amp;amp;id=221840&amp;amp;ds=9/2011 &lt;br /&gt;
SUB-LD8671-EM - The Mental Health (Independent Mental Health Advocates) (Wales) Regulations 2011 - Explanatory Memorandum &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have any queries in relation to either of these pieces of subordinate legislation, please contact the Welsh Government's Mental Health Legislation Team at mentalhealthlegislation@wales.gsi.gov.uk&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===27/9/11 (email 2)===&lt;br /&gt;
On 26 September 2011 the Welsh Government began a formal consultation on the draft Mental Health (Regional Provision) (Wales) Regulations 2012.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If made, this subordinate legislation would enable Local Health Boards and local authorities in Wales to enter into regional working arrangements to deliver local mental primary mental health support services under Part 1 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010, and in making arrangements for the provision of assessments for former users of secondary mental health services under Part 3 of the Measure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The consultation period begins on 26 September 2011, and all responses must be submitted to the Welsh Government's Mental Health Legislation Team no later than 16 December 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A hyperlink to the draft Regulations and consultation document is attached here:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://wales.gov.uk/consultations/healthsocialcare/regulations2012/?lang=en&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you require any further information on these draft Regulations, or the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010, please contact: mentalhealthlegislation@wales.gsi.gov.uk &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===27/9/11 (email 1)===&lt;br /&gt;
On Monday 19 September 2011 the Minister for Health and Social Services laid before the National Assembly for Wales two sets of Regulations associated with the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010: the Mental Health (Assessment of Former Users of Secondary Mental Health Services) (Wales) Regulations 2011 and the Mental Health (Independent Mental Health Advocates) (Wales) Regulations 2011, along with accompanying Explanatory Memoranda and Regulatory Impact Assessments.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These can be accessed via the attached hyperlinks:&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.assemblywales.org/bus-home/bus-business-fourth-assembly-laid-docs.htm?act=dis&amp;amp;id=221838&amp;amp;ds=9/2011&lt;br /&gt;
SUB-LD8672-EM - The Mental Health (Assessment of Former Users of Secondary Mental Health Services) (Wales) Regulations 2011 - Explanatory Memorandum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.assemblywales.org/bus-home/bus-business-fourth-assembly-laid-docs.htm?act=dis&amp;amp;id=221840&amp;amp;ds=9/2011&lt;br /&gt;
SUB-LD8671-EM - The Mental Health (Independent Mental Health Advocates) (Wales) Regulations 2011 - Explanatory Memorandum&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These Regulations have been scheduled for debate by Assembly Members in the Senedd on Tuesday 18 October 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
A formal consultation process took place in relation to both sets of Regulations earlier in the year, and the consultation response reports from this exercise can be accessed via the attached hyperlinks:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://wales.gov.uk/consultations/healthsocialcare/assessment/?lang=en&amp;amp;status=closed&lt;br /&gt;
http://wales.gov.uk/consultations/healthsocialcare/advocates/?lang=en&amp;amp;status=closed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you require any further information on the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010, please contact the Welsh Government's Mental Health Legislation Team at: mentalhealthlegislation@wales.gsi.gov.uk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===14/9/11===&lt;br /&gt;
Please find attached a copy of the Welsh Government's Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010 National Service Model for Local Primary Mental health Support Services.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Part 1 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010 places duties on Local Health Boards and local authorities to work together to make local primary mental health support services available to people of all ages across Wales.  This National Service Model will assist the delivery of these services.  It provides guidance to these bodies in meeting their Part 1 duties: it sets out the duties, functions and objectives of local primary mental health support services, and gives guidance on the requirements for the delivery of the services and the operational arrangements which are needed to support that delivery.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The document can also be accessed via the Welsh Government's website at the following address:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://wales.gov.uk/topics/health/publications/health/guidance/national/?lang=en &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===22/12/10===&lt;br /&gt;
In March 2010 the Welsh Assembly Government introduced the proposed Mental Health (Wales) Measure to the National Assembly for Wales.  Since then the Measure has progressed through the four-stage Assembly scrutiny process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Measure was agreed in its final form by the National Assembly for Wales in plenary on 2 November and submitted for Royal Approval by Her Majesty the Queen in Privy Council thereafter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Wednesday 15 December, the Measure received Royal Approval.  This concludes the legislative process and the Measure will now be brought into force incrementally from next year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Measure is concerned with –&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Local primary mental health support services;&lt;br /&gt;
*Care coordination and care and treatment planning within secondary mental health services;&lt;br /&gt;
*Assessment of former users of secondary mental health services;&lt;br /&gt;
*Independent mental health advocacy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Welsh Assembly Government is currently developing subordinate legislation to be made under the Measure, and consultation on this will take place during spring 2011.  Work on the pre-implementation delivery programme has also begun.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You will receive a further update when the consultation on the subordinate legislation begins in the new year.  In the meantime, if there are any issues in relation to the Measure that you would wish to discuss, please do not hesitate to contact us.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===4/11/10===&lt;br /&gt;
You will be aware that the proposed Mental Health (Wales) Measure has been progressing through the National Assembly for Wales' scrutiny process for the past 8 months.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On Tuesday a milestone was reached as the National Assembly for Wales in plenary considered and passed the Measure in its final form.  The debate can be viewed on Senedd TV via the attached link:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.senedd.tv/&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The National Assembly's Record of Proceedings also carries a full transcript of the debate:&lt;br /&gt;
http://www.assemblywales.org/bus-home/bus-record-of-proceedings.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tuesday’s approval concludes the National Assembly's consideration of the Measure.  There will now follow a four week period during which the Counsel General, Attorney General, and Secretary of State for Wales may refer the proposed Measure to the Supreme Court for a decision on legislative competence.  If this does not happen, the proposed Measure will be submitted for approval by HM the Queen in Council, which will conclude the legislative process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:Implementing the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010.pdf|Welsh Assembly Government, 'Implementing the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010: Guidance for Local Health Boards and Local Authorities' (dated January 2011, published 3/2/11)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.legislation.gov.uk/mwa/2010/7/contents/enacted Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010 on Legislation.gov.uk]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.assemblywales.org/bus-home/bus-legislation/bus-leg-measures/business-legislation-measures-mhs-2.htm Proposed Mental Health (Wales) Measure page on Welsh Assembly website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.mentalhealthwales.net/mhw/news.php?id=835 Mental Health Wales, 'AMs approve Proposed Mental Health (Wales) Measure', news item 5/11/10]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.mentalhealthwales.net/mhw/news.php?id=835 Mental Health Wales, 'National Assembly to Approve New Welsh Mental Health Law on Tuesday 2nd November', news item 1/11/10]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Miscellaneous legislation]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates</id>
		<title>Updates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T20:55:29Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: /* Recent updates on website */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you have anything which is not yet on the internet (e.g. court results or transcripts) then please send it in (see [[Help|Help page]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping up to date==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Email.jpg] You can now subscribe to free '''[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Email updates]''', on an occasional or monthly basis. &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Discussion http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Discussion.png] Join the new [[Discussion|email discussion list]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/t_mini-a.png] Receive updates as soon as they are added by following us on Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline @mhlonline]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/RSS.gif] Subscribe to the website's [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed RSS update feed]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/E-book_16x16.png] Receive monthly updates delivered automatically to your [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Kindle e-reader]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent updates on website==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bullet_feed title=&amp;quot;Mental Health Law Online Update RSS&amp;quot; desc=&amp;quot;What's new on the site&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (17): Consultation on a Separate Legal Jurisdiction for Wales (27/3/12 to 19/6/12). The Welsh Government are consulting on making things even more unnecessarily complicated, by creating an entirely separate legal jurisdiction for Wales. See [[Consultations#Wales]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (16): Martha Spurrier, 'The great safety net' (Solicitors Journal, 2/4/12). Reproduced by kind permission. See [[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (15): LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12). The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (14): Steve Doughty, 'Father of two with motor neurone disease wins right to die by blinking his eye after judge's landmark ruling' (Daily Mail, 1/5/12). See [[Settled cases and forthcoming judgments#Re XB (advance decision, Theis J)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (13): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Parkins (2012) EWCA Crim 856, (2012) MHLO 50}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (12): PI quantum case. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (11): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (10): PVS case. {{pagesummary|Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (9): Best interests case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (8): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (7): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (6): Simon Edwards, 'Capacity and tenancies/licences' (39 Essex Street, 19/4/12). See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (5): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 21, May 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP) — Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33 — Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP) — Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47 — Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48 — Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (4): Rosalind English, 'Delay in transferring mental health patient for treatment amounted to &amp;quot;inhumane treatment&amp;quot;' (3/5/12). This article concludes: 'This is a prime example of using Article 3 as a social and economic right, not a basic civil right, and thus extended leaves publicly funded authorities to carry out difficult jobs with threats of litigation looming on all sides. The UK courts recognised this claim for what it was, and dismissed it. Strasbourg should have done the same.' See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (3): Mental Health Cop Blog, 'MS v UK' (4/5/12). This article is in favour of the judgment and makes points in relation to (1) place of safety arguments, (2) accessing psychiatric beds, (3) media coverage, and (4) implications. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (2): ECtHR, 'Prolonged police detention of mentally-ill man without adequate medical care violated his Convention rights' (Press release ref ECHR 195 (2012), 3/5/12). This is the court's summary of the judgment. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (1): Article 3 case. {{pagesummary|MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (25): Westminster Hall debate on Litigation Friends (HC Deb, 21 March 2012, c244WH). See [[Official Solicitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (24): Irwin Mitchell Solicitors, 'Mother Proved Right As Son Freed From Padded Room Hell Makes Progress' (29/3/12). 'Court Anonymity Order Lifted Naming Wigan Borough Council As Local Authority Which Locked Up Her Autistic Son.' See [[Re C; C v Wigan Borough Council (2011) EWHC 1539 (Admin)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (23): HMCTS, 'Mental Health Tribunal Stakeholder Bulletin April 2012' (17/4/12). The following are the headings: Contacting the Tribunal; Reports Processing Team; Section 2 Cases; Scanned Reports; Password protection; Notification to the Tribunal of Patient Withdrawals and RC Discharges; HQ2 Questionnaire; FTT Mental Health Policy update; Clerking; Facilities for the Hearing impaired; Olympics and Paralympics 2012 and the potential impact; Relist Team; Customer Survey; Feedback. In relation to the new forms: '''Form CNL2''' ('Case Notification Letter 2'), which from May 2012 will be sent to the representative with the RC's report, demands that the representative complete '''Form HQ2''' ('Hearing Questionnaire 2'). HQ2 asks the following questions: (1) What is the Patient seeking from the tribunal, and what are the principal areas of dispute? (2) Do you intend to call an independent expert? If so, please give details. (3) What is your hearing time estimate? (4) Would this case benefit from pre-hearing review by a tribunal judge? If so, please say why (e.g. change of status under the Act, or recent hospital transfer). (5) Are there any other matters that you feel that the panel should know in order to dispose of this matter justly, fairly and without delay? (6) Does the patient need an interpreter? If so, please give details of language and dialect. See [[Mental Health Tribunal#Tribunal member and stakeholder email bulletin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (22): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 20, April 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: Austin v UK 39692/09 [2012] ECHR 459, [2012] MHLO 22, DD v Lithuania 13469/06 [2012] ECHR 254, [2012] MHLO 29, DL v A Local Authority [2012] EWCA Civ 253, [2012] MHLO 32, Long v Rodman [2012] EWHC 347 (Ch), [2012] MHLO 12, ZH v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 604 (QB), [2012] MHLO 25, Seaton v Seddon [2012] EWHC 735 (Ch), [2012] MHLO 28, Coombs v Dorset NHS PCT [2012] EWHC 521 (QB), [2012] MHLO 13. Also mentioned are: CQC report on DOLS; Listing Deprivation of Liberty Safeguarding cases; COP Cases Online and all previous newsletters in one PDF document. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (21): LPA case. {{pagesummary|Re Drew (2012) MHLO 45 (LPA)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (20): LPA case. {{pagesummary|Re Bloom (2012) MHLO 44 (LPA)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (19): LPA case. {{pagesummary|Re Batchelor (2012) MHLO 43 (LPA)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (18): CQC, 'CQC inspector dismissed for gross misconduct' (27/4/12). 'A CQC inspector has been dismissed for gross misconduct after an internal investigation revealed that the impartiality of their regulatory judgements had been seriously compromised. This came to light as a result of whistle-blowing information to the CQC. No additional detail can be provided as CQC has now referred this matter to the police.' See [[CQC]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (17): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v B (2012) EWCA Crim 770, (2012) MHLO 42}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (16): Immigration appeal with mental health aspect. {{pagesummary|R (HA (Nigeria)) v SSHD (2012) EWHC 979 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 41}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (15): Sentence appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Ahmed (2012) EWCA Crim 708, (2012) MHLO 40}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (14): Costs. {{pagesummary|R (Sutton) v Calderdale Council (2012) EWHC 637 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 39}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (13): Immigration appeal with mental health aspect. {{pagesummary|MM (Zimbabwe) v SSHD (2012) EWCA Civ 279, (2012) MHLO 38}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (12): Extradition case with mental health aspect. {{pagesummary|Republic of South Africa v Dewani (2012) EWHC 842 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 37}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (11): Southern Irish case. {{pagesummary|L v Clinical Director of St Patrick's University Hospital (2012) IEHC 15, (2012) MHLO 36}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (10): Southern Irish case from 2008. {{pagesummary|Han v President of the Circuit Court (2008) IEHC 160}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (9): HMCTS, 'T128: Options for your Tribunal Referral Hearing: Community Patients' (April 2012). This is the form which is sent to CTO patients inviting them to cancel their tribunal referral hearings. See [[Tribunal Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (8): New caselaw category. See [[:Category:Statutory will cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (7): Statutory will case. {{pagesummary|Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Barbara Rich of 5 Stone Buildings&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (6): Updated guidance. HMCTS, 'Room Specification Recommendations for Tribunal Hearings' (March 2012). See [[Mental Health Tribunal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (5): The LSC is consulting on their proposal to discontinue funding for the Specialist Support Service, as a result of conceding a judicial review of their decision to do so. The consultation runs until 11/5/12. The specialist support service for mental health is run by Scott Moncrieff Solicitors, and is available from Monday to Friday, 10am to 4pm, on 0844 800 3364. Related articles: Legal Aid Handbook Blog, 'LSC concede judicial review; specialist support reprieved' (1/3/12); Legal Aid Handbook Blog, 'Weekly round up' (1/4/12). See [[Consultations#Legal Services Commission]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (4): Sentence appeal case. {{pagesummary|R v Levey (2012) EWCA Crim 657, (2012) MHLO 34}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (3): Capacity/PI case. {{pagesummary|Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (2): Southern Irish case. {{pagesummary|Re JO'B; HSE v JO'B (2011) IEHC 73}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (1): Mind, 'Legal enewsletter' (Issue 11, April 2012). This newsletter contains: (1) Articles: (a) Making best interests decisions under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, (b) Listening to experience - Mind's report into acute and crisis mental healthcare, (c) The right to life under Article 2 of the ECHR, (d) The right to independent living - is it working?; (2) Case reports: (a) SSJ v RB (2011) EWCA Civ 1608, (b) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257, (c) O'Cathail v Transport for London (2012) EWCA Civ 92; (3) Updates: (a) Discrimination news, (b) Section 117 MHA 1983 and the Health and Social Care Bill 2012, (c) Changes to mental health tribunal rules and procedure, (d) Care Quality Commission, (e) Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CPID) Toolkit, (e) Proposed DVLA changes: fitness to drive, (f) Court of Protection. See [[Mind (Charity)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*26/04/12 (2): Turning Point, a health and social care charity, has an opportunity for a part-time Mental Health Act Administrator (22.5 hours) at a new 28-person Independent Hospital in Mastin Moor, Chesterfield. The closing date for applications is 10/5/12. See [https://turningpoint.ppsworks.co.uk/apply/index1.php?online_ref=31Dl34M6 Turning Point website] for details and to apply. See [[Jobs]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*26/04/12 (1): New COP Practice Direction. {{pagesummary|COP Practice Direction: Preparation of Bundles}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*25/04/12 (1): The Mental Health Lawyers Association will be running their successful two-day course for membership of the Law Society's Mental Health Accreditation Scheme (formerly the MHRT panel) in Leeds on Monday 18/6/12 and Tuesday 19/6/12. Price: £300 (members); £390 (non-members); £250 (for third and subsequent members in a group). CPD: 12 SRA-accredited hours. See MHLA website for further details and booking form. See [[Events]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*24/04/12 (2): {{pagesummary|Health and Social Care Act 2012}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*24/04/12 (1): {{pagesummary|Mental Health (Hospital, Guardianship and Treatment) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2012}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*19/04/12 (2): Please subscribe to Mental Health Law Online's new discussion list. This is separate from the email updates list, which remains unchanged. The discussion list will cover all aspects of mental health law in England and Wales, from the Mental Health Act 1983 and the Mental Health Tribunal, to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Court of Protection. See [[Discussion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*19/04/12 (1): Mental Health Law Online is six years old today! Many thanks to all readers, contributors and subscribers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*18/04/12 (2): Legal Action articles on the required content of social circumstances reports and responsible authority statements, reproduced by kind permission: (1) Christopher Curran, Malcolm Golightley and Phil Fennell, 'Social circumstances reports for mental health tribunals - Part 1' (Legal Action, June 2010); (2) Christopher Curran, Malcolm Golightley and Phil Fennell, 'Social circumstances reports for mental health tribunals - Part 1' (Legal Action, July 2010); (3) Christopher Curran, Phil Fennell and Simon Burrows, 'Responsible authority statements for mental health tribunals' (Legal Action, March 2012). See [[Tribunal Rules]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*18/04/12 (1): David Hewitt, 'Purpose alone can no longer determine if there is a deprivation of liberty' (Solicitors Journal, 16/4/12). This article argues that the reference in the Court of Appeal decision in Cheshire West to 'purpose' as being relevant to the objective element of deprivation of liberty is not supported by the subsequent ECtHR decision in Austin. See [[Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (4): New version. {{pagesummary|Guidance Booklet: Reports for Mental Health Tribunals}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (3): Mark Hinchliffe, 'Important Notice' (29/3/12). This document describes the changes made by the [[Tribunal Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2012]] on 6/4/12. In relation to the tribunal's requirement, in CTO reference cases, for evidence from the RC about the patient's capacity to decide not to attend or be represented, it states: 'We do not see that this should present a difficulty or a conflict of interest. The Responsible Clinician, as an expert witness, has no &amp;quot;interest&amp;quot; one way or the other and, in any event, has a responsibility to assess capacity in many situations...' See [[Mental Health Tribunal#Messages from Deputy Chamber President]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (2): New Practice Direction on reports. {{pagesummary|Practice Direction: First-tier Tribunal Health Education and Social Care Chamber: Statements and Reports in Mental Health Cases}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (1): LSC, 'New Keycard 48 to be introduced from 9 April' (5/4/12). Keycard 48 reflects an increase in the standard dependants' allowances assessed for a partner or child living within the client's household; the new rates are applicable to new applications or further assessments made on or after 9 April 2012. Eligibility limits are unchanged. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*06/04/12 (1): Case (detained patient paying for treatment): transcript and neutral citation now available. {{pagesummary|Coombs v Dorset NHS PCT (2012) EWHC 521 (QB), (2012) MHLO 13}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/04/12 (1): The following was asked on a discussion page on 2/4/12. 'Does anyone know: if a CTO inadvertently lapses (i.e. is not renewed by accident) does the original section 3 which the CTO was suspending come back into being? I know if you discharge someone from the CTO that discharges from the section 3. If you revoke the CTO then the Section 3 will come back into being. But if the CTO just lapses does that also mean that the Section 3 that was suspended has lapsed by default as well? I don't know the answer but if anyone does that would be really helpful. Thanks'. The answer is that when the CTO expires the s3 ceases to have effect: see [[s20B]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*01/04/12 (1): The government have announced that from 1 April 2012, following the Court of Appeal decision in [[Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257]] and the subsequent High Court decision in [[Re C; C v Blackburn and Darwen Borough Council (2011) EWHC 3321 (COP)]], the entire Mental Health Act 1983 will be repealed. The government spokesman, Avril Poisson, said: “Those subject to the Act lack capacity, as demonstrated by their inability to comply with voluntary inpatient treatment, and they should be treated equally to others who lack capacity. Recent case law on deprivation of liberty has shown that the relevant contrast when assessing ‘relative normality’ is not ‘the ordinary adult going about the kind of life which the able-bodied man or woman on the Clapham omnibus would normally expect to lead’ but rather ‘the kind of lives that people like X would normally expect to lead’ (Cheshire West, para 102). Periods of hospital inpatient treatment are normal, as an inevitable corollary of psychiatric disabilities: during those periods there are no realistic alternatives and no deprivation of liberty within the meaning of [[Article 5]] of the European Convention.” She said that the 29-year-old Act would be abolished with immediate effect because it is no longer fit for purpose, and that the “so-called” deprivation of liberty safeguards would also come under scrutiny. “When I use a word,” she said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” '''[Hope you enjoyed the April Fools' Day joke!]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*30/03/12 (1): The March 2012 CPD questionnaire is now online. Obtain 12 accredited CPD points for £60. See [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/cpd/ CPD scheme]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (6): CQC, 'The operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in England, 2010/11' (March 2012). Key findings: '(1) 8,982 applications to deprive a person of their liberty were processed, of which 50 per cent were authorised. (2) Many services have developed good practice on the use of the safeguards, especially in involving people and their families in the decision-making process, but some were confused as to when restraints or restrictions on a person amounted to a deprivation of liberty. (3) Between a third and a quarter of care homes had not provided their staff with training on the safeguards, and in some cases only the manager had received training. (4) Most hospitals had held some training, but the proportion of staff involved ranged between 20-100 per cent.' See also: CQC, 'Summary: The operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in England, 2010/11' (March 2012); Lucy Series, 'CQC's second monitoring report on the deprivation of liberty safeguards' (Small Places blog, 27/3/12). See [[CQC]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (5): LSC, 'Accreditation contribution scheme update' (28/3/12). From 2/4/12 the LSC will reduce the amount it contributes to the costs of mental health panel membership by 50% to £73.44; from 1/4/13 there will be no contribution at all. In recent weeks the Law Society's accreditation fees doubled to £500 plus VAT. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (4): Case transcript. {{pagesummary|A London Borough v VT (2011) EWHC 3806 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (3): Case transcript. {{pagesummary|EB v RC (2011) EWHC 3805 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (2): Neutral citation available. {{pagesummary|Re JDS; KGS v JDS (2012) EWHC 302 (COP), (2012) MHLO 4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (1): Case summary. {{pagesummary|DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/bullet_feed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update archive===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[March 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[February 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[January 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Updates|Previous updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Consultations</id>
		<title>Consultations</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Consultations"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T20:54:38Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: /* Wales */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Various consultations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Care Quality Commission==&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Consultation on our assessments of quality 2010-11 (2/2/10 to 27/4/10)===&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.cqc.org.uk/newsandevents/newsstories.cfm?FaArea1=customwidgets.content_view_1&amp;amp;cit_id=35841 Press release, 2/2/10]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.cqc.org.uk/getinvolved/consultations/assessmentsofquality.cfm Consultation documents, 2/2/10]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Consultation on the CQC mental health strategy (until 7/9/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We are currently developing our strategic plan for our work on mental health over the next three to five years. We are keen to get a range of views to help us develop this plan.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We would like to invite you to give your views as part our consultation on:&lt;br /&gt;
* Where does the Care Quality Commission need to focus its efforts in the next three to five years to really make a difference in mental health?&lt;br /&gt;
* How should we involve people who use services and their families and carers in developing, implementing and monitoring the strategy?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.cqc.org.uk/getinvolved/consultations/consultationonthecqcmentalhealthstrategy.cfm Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Help shape the regulation of health and adult social care services (Consultation on new registration standards) (1/6/09 to 24/8/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The regulation of health and adult social care is changing. Take part in our public consultation to help us develop guidance on what care services must do to meet new legally enforceable registration standards. From April 2010 all regulated health and adult social care providers will be required by law to register with us. This is the first time all public and independent health and adult social care services in England will need to meet essential common standards of quality and safety. We would like your feedback on whether our guidance appropriately reflects the new registration standards and what should rightly be expected of a safe, quality care service.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.cqc.org.uk/newsandevents/newsstories.cfm?cit_id=34912&amp;amp;FAArea1=customWidgets.content_view_1&amp;amp;usecache=false Consultation documents]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==CPS==&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Interim guidance on assisted suicide (23/9/09 - 16/12/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
The purpose of this consultation is to seek a wide range of views on the Director of Public Prosecution’s (DPP’s) recently published interim guidance on assisted suicide.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.cps.gov.uk/consultations/ CPS consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.cps.gov.uk/consultations/as_responses.html Responses]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[Assisted suicide]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Cases involving people with mental health problems and/or learning disabilities as victims and witnesses (closed 1/3/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.cps.gov.uk/consultations/mhld_index.html CPS website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Department of Health==&lt;br /&gt;
Consultations carried out by the [[Department of Health]]. See their [http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Liveconsultations/DH_092048 Consultations page].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Consultation on low secure services and psychiatric intensive care (19/1/12 to 19/4/12)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;A consultation document on low secure services and psychiatric intensive care is being issued today for a three month consultation by stakeholders. The purpose of this consultation is to invite the views of stakeholders on how new guidance will operate by explaining the rationale behind the strategic approach and raising questions which cover a broad range of issues.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.dh.gov.uk/health/2012/01/consultation-on-low-secure-services-and-psychiatric-intensive-care/ Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Consultation on the joint Department of Health / NOMS Offender Personality Disorder Pathway Implementation Plan (17/2/11 to 12/5/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
'This consultation is seeking your views about a new pathway approach for the treatment and management of offenders with serious personality disorders.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Closedconsultations/DH_124435 Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Responsestoconsultations/DH_130566 DH, 'Response to the offender personality disorder consultation' (gateway ref 16313, 21/10/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Consultation on allocation options for funding for Local Healthwatch: PCT Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (27/7/11 to 24/10/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
'Subject to the passage of the Health and Social Care Bill, the Department (DH) will allocate funding for local HealthWatch and, potentially, PCT Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards from October 2012. This new funding will be added to the current DH Learning Disabilities and Health Reform grant. This consultation is asking for your views on options for distributing the new funding for local HealthWatch and PCT Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards (DOLS).'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Liveconsultations/DH_128429 Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Consultation on preventing suicide in England: a cross-government outcomes strategy to save lives (19/7/11 to 11/10/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
'This document sets out a proposal for a new suicide prevention strategy for England with the aims of reducing the suicide rate and improving support for those bereaved or affected by suicide.  The draft strategy brings together knowledge about groups at higher risk of suicide, effective interventions and resources available.  The closing date for consultation responses is 11 October 2011.  Consultation responses will inform the final strategy, early in 2012.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Liveconsultations/DH_128065 Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Swine flu and temporary MHA amendments (10/9/09 - 7/10/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
Pandemic influenza and the Mental Health Act 1983: consultation on proposed changes to the Mental Health Act 1983 and its associated secondary legislation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;You are invited to comment on proposals for temporary amendments to the Mental Health Act 1983 which may be required in the event of the severe staff shortages that may be expected during an influenza pandemic. You are invited to say whether you think these proposals are likely to be helpful.  Please let us know if there are any significant issues which you think we should have included, or if we have included anything unnecessary.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Liveconsultations/DH_103683 Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/influencinglaw/policyinresponse/view=article.law?DOCUMENTID=423410 Law Society response] - 14/10/09&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Dh 128823 Influenza response.pdf|Dept of Health, 'Pandemic Influenza and the Mental Health Act 1983: Response to Consultation on Proposed Changes to the Mental Health Act 1983 and its Associated Secondary Legislation' (29/7/11)]]. The Government have concluded that all of the proposed temporary amendments (and further amendments to s5) would be an appropriate part of a package of contingency measures. The proposals requiring legislative changes are: (1) Allowing just one medical recommendation on an application by an&lt;br /&gt;
AMHP for someone to be detained under sections 2 or 3 of the 1983 Act.&lt;br /&gt;
(2) To facilitate C1 above, preparing special forms A2A and A6A for use by&lt;br /&gt;
a doctor making a single medical recommendation.&lt;br /&gt;
(3) Changing the number of doctors involved in decisions to transfer&lt;br /&gt;
people from prison to hospital under Part 3 of the 1983 Act.&lt;br /&gt;
(4) Suspending the obligation to obtain SOAD opinions on medication.&lt;br /&gt;
(5). Suspending time limits on conveying people and admitting them to&lt;br /&gt;
hospital under Part 3.&lt;br /&gt;
(6). Suspending time limits on warrants for transferring people from prison&lt;br /&gt;
to hospital.&lt;br /&gt;
(7) Giving courts discretion to renew remands under the 1983 Act beyond&lt;br /&gt;
the normal 12 week maximum.&lt;br /&gt;
(8) Allowing SHAs the flexibility to approve former RMOs and former&lt;br /&gt;
approved clinicians to be temporary approved clinicians.&lt;br /&gt;
(9) Allowing SHAs the flexibility to approve current section 12 doctors who&lt;br /&gt;
have not previously acted as RMOs to be temporary approved clinicians&lt;br /&gt;
(10) Allowing local social services authorities the flexibility to approve&lt;br /&gt;
former ASWs and former AMHPs to be temporary AMHPs.&lt;br /&gt;
(11) Seeking a three-month transitional period for SOAD second opinions.&lt;br /&gt;
(12) If there should be a large number of staff deaths, keeping the&lt;br /&gt;
contingency measures for temporarily approved AMHPs and approved&lt;br /&gt;
clinicians in place until fully trained replacements can be approved.&lt;br /&gt;
(13) Extending the periods of emergency detention permitted under section&lt;br /&gt;
5(2) (emergency detention of a hospital in-patient by a doctor or approved&lt;br /&gt;
clinician) from up to 72 hours to up to 120 hours.&lt;br /&gt;
(14) Extending the periods of emergency detention permitted under section&lt;br /&gt;
5(4) (emergency detention of a hospital in-patient by a nurse with special&lt;br /&gt;
expertise in mental health or learning disability) from up to 6 hours to up to 12&lt;br /&gt;
hours.&lt;br /&gt;
(15) Allowing any approved clinician or registered medical practitioner to&lt;br /&gt;
detain a hospital in-patient under section 5(2) rather than just the one in&lt;br /&gt;
charge of the case.&lt;br /&gt;
(16) To facilitate C15 above, preparing special form H1A for use by an approved clinician or doctor who is not in charge of the case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Safety and Security Directions – High Secure Psychiatric Services (10/8/09 - 2/11/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The aim of this consultation is to gather views on the proposed revision of The High Security Psychiatric Services (Arrangements for Safety and Security at Ashworth, Broadmoor and Rampton Hospitals) Directions 2009 and associated guidance, by inviting the views of key stakeholders&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Liveconsultations/DH_103875 Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] New Horizons (23/7/09 to 15/10/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Good mental health is fundamental to the well-being and prosperity of England. In the last decade, greater investment and reforms have transformed mental health care, but now we need to go further. We need to target the root causes of mental illness and support the local development of higher quality, more personalised services.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/Mentalhealth/NewHorizons/index.htm New Horizons page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://newhorizons.dh.gov.uk/Resources/reports/Report-on-responses-to-the-consultation/index.aspx New Horizons: Towards a shared vision for mental health: Report on responses to the consultation] - 12/3/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] DOLS regulations (closed 30/1/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;These draft regulations confer power on the Care Quality Commission for the purpose of monitoring, and reporting on, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The draft regulations also amend regulation 3 of the Mental Capacity (Deprivation of Liberty: Standard Authorisations, Assessments and Ordinary Residence) Regulations 2008. Regulation 3 currently sets out that one of the requirements for a person to be eligible to carry out a MCA DOLS assessment is that they must be insured in respect of any liabilities arising in connection with carrying out the assessment. We are proposing to amend this regulation so that assessors will be eligible if they have satisfied the supervisory body that they have adequate and appropriate insurance and / or indemnity arrangements in place.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Liveconsultations/DH_092048 Details on DH website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Responsestoconsultations/DH_095178 Response to the consultation] - published 23/2/09&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Direct payments regulations (19/8/08 to 11/11/08)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Direct payments are crucial to achieving the Government's aim to increase independence, choice and control, for service users and their carers, through allowing them the opportunity to arrange their own personalised care. The Health and Social Care Act 2008 extends the availability of direct payments to those people who lack the capacity to consent to their receipt. In addition, the government is also reviewing the current exclusions to receiving direct payments for those people who are subject to various provisions of mental health legislation in light of the modernisation of mental health law brought about by the Mental Health Act 2007. The Government is now consulting on regulations relating to these two changes.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Closedconsultations/DH_087108 Consultation and response]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Environmental design principles for adult medium secure units (17/4/09 to 10/7/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This draft document launches a consultation on revisions to previously published medium secure environmental guidance (Design Guide 1993). It is anticipated the document will annex the Best Practice Guidance and Specification for Adult Medium Secure Services, published by the Department of Health in 2007.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Liveconsultations/DH_098324 Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Safeguarding adults: a consultation on the review of the ‘No Secrets’ guidance (16/10/08 to 31/1/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Department of Health, the Home Office and the Ministry of Justice have launched the national consultation on the review of the No Secrets guidance. Minister for Care Services; Phil Hope MP said: 'This consultation paper is about learning. It is about how we as a society learn to empower people - both the public and the professionals - to identify risk and manage risk. It is about how we empower people to say no to abusive situations and criminal behaviour. It is about locating safeguarding in the wider agenda of choice and control. It is about recognising safeguarding as everyone's business. It is about identifying the tools we need for better safeguarding.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The consultation is for everyone - it has questions for social workers, and housing officers, for police officers and for lawyers. It has questions for members of the public and for service users.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Summary of responses published 17/7/09. Government response to follow&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Responsestoconsultations/DH_102764 Summary of responses] - 17/7/09&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Home Office==&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Violent Offender Order (Information About Release or Transfer) Regulations (12/3/10 to 12/5/10)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;i&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Violent Offender Orders (VOOs) were introduced on 3 August 2009 as part of the government’s commitment to do more to protect the public from violent offenders. They are civil preventative orders which the police can use to place controls on violent offenders in circumstances where they could potentially pose the greatest danger to the public. The VOO (information about release or transfer) Regulations will make it a legal requirement for responsible bodies, including mental health services (where an individual is detained under part 3 of the Mental Health Act 1983), to notify the police service or the receiving institution if an offender subject to a VOO is to be released or transferred from their care.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;We are consulting to seek views specifically of mental health service providers on the extent to which they may be affected by the proposals contained within the regulations and to establish what support they would need from the Home Office to enable them to comply with the new duty to notify. Within the consultation paper we are proposing to develop a short guide and/or standard template to enable hospitals to more easily comply with the proposed duty to notify and the consultation seeks the view of mental health services on this.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/i&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/documents/cons-2010-voo/index.html Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Law Commission==&lt;br /&gt;
===Unfitness to Plead and the Insanity Defence (27/10/10 to 27/1/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Our recommendations focus on a new legal test for determining whether a person is unfit to plead and reform of the section 4A hearing which follows a finding that an accused is unfit to plead.  The proposals seek to bring the criminal law into line with modern psychiatric understanding and the approach of the civil law to capacity – both in the civil common law and under the Mental Capacity Act 2005.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/insanity.htm Background information and main page]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/docs/cp197_web.pdf Law Commission, 'Unfitness to plead: a consultation paper' (LCCP 197, 2010)]&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/docs/UTP_Press_release_for_web.pdf Press release]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Adult Social Care (24/2/10 to 1/7/10)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The overall aim of the project is to provide a clearer, modern and more cohesive framework for adult social care.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/adult_social_care.htm Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.communitycare.co.uk/Articles/2010/02/24/113878/five-key-reforms-to-re-shape-adult-care-law.htm Community Care: Five key reforms to re-shape adult care law] - 24/2/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/influencinglaw/policyinresponse/view=article.law?DOCUMENTID=428898 Law Society response to the Law Commission review of adult social care] - 14/7/10 - The Law Society are supportive of the proposed reforms and urge the government to implement the recommendations as matter of priority&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_119398 The Government response to Law Commission consultation paper 192. Review of the law on adult social care] - 14/9/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:File:Law Commission ASC Consultation Analysis March 2011.pdf|Law Commission, 'Adult Social Care: Consultation Analysis' (31/3/11)]]. This document summaries the responses to the Adult Social Care consultation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Legal Services Commission==&lt;br /&gt;
Consultations relating to the [[Legal Aid]] system. See the LSC's [https://consult.legalservices.gov.uk/inovem/consult.ti/system/calendar?siteid=131&amp;amp;ca_listbrand=cls Consultations page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Specialist Support Services (30/3/12 to 11/5/12)===&lt;br /&gt;
The LSC is consulting on their proposal to discontinue funding for the Specialist Support Service, as a result of conceding a judicial review of their decision to do so.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The specialist support service for mental health is run by Scott Moncrieff Solicitors, and is available from Monday to Friday, 10am to 4pm, on 0844 800 3364.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/specialist_support.asp Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://legalaidhandbook.com/2012/03/01/lsc-concede-judicial-review/ Legal Aid Handbook Blog, 'LSC concede judicial review; specialist support reprieved' (1/3/12)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://legalaidhandbook.com/2012/04/01/weekly-round-up-18/ Legal Aid Handbook Blog, 'Weekly round up' (1/4/12)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (closes 10/5/10)===&lt;br /&gt;
This discussion paper sets out the LSC's proposed future minimum quality requirements for purchasing criminal advocacy services. The focus is on crime but the intention is for quality assurance schemes to apply to all areas of law. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/criminal/contracting/quality_assurance_scheme_advocates.asp Discussion paper page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Civil Bid Rounds for 2010 Contracts (closed 23/1/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consultation closed on 23/1/09. &amp;quot;Through this consultation we are seeking views on our proposals for the bid criteria and award process for civil legal aid contracts that will be introduced from 2010. We are also consulting on key changes to the contract terms and to changes to the scope of legal aid funding.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[https://consult.legalservices.gov.uk/inovem/consult.ti/2010Contracts/consultationHome Consultation: Civil Bid Rounds for 2010 Contracts]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Mental Health Tribunal==&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] The Role of IMHAs in Hearings (14/10/10 - 15/11/10)===&lt;br /&gt;
Consultation on draft Guidance Note on the role of IMHAs (in their capacity as IMHAs, rather than as representatives) at Tribunal hearings. Consideration is given to (1) attendance at the hearing; (2) seating arrangements; (3) relationship with the legal representative; (4) role in relation to any procedural issues; (5) giving of evidence; (6) asking questions and addressing the panel; (7) right of access to the Tribunal's decision.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.mhrt.org.uk//Documents/News/DraftGuidTribRoleIndpndtMHAdvocates_141010.pdf Consultation document]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MHLA response to draft guidance on IMHAs.doc|Mental Health Lawyers Association, 'MHLA response to the consultation by the Tribunals Service (Mental Health) on the role of IMHAs on MHT hearings', 11/12/10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Proposed changes to listing procedure (April 2010)===&lt;br /&gt;
The Tribunals Service are consulting stakeholders on new procedures and forms for the listing of cases.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.mhrt.org.uk//Documents/News/changestolistingprocedure.pdf Consultation details on &amp;quot;MHRT&amp;quot; website] - 12/4/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.mhla.co.uk/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=460 Mental Health Lawyers Association: Consultation - proposed changes to Tribunal listing procedure] - 7/4/10 - Membership required&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.mhrt.org.uk//Documents/SummaryConsultationResponses.pdf Summary of Consultation Responses] - 30/7/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Consultation on proposed amendments to the Tribunal Procedure Rules (1/6/11 - 23/8/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Tribunal Procedure Committee is consulting on changes to the rules so that the Tribunal may (1) make a decision on a reference under [[s68]] (duty of managers to refer cases to tribunal) without a hearing if the patient is a community patient and has consented to this; and (2) strike out a party's case without a hearing. The purpose is to save money. The rationale given for the first proposal is that community patients are often content with their position and do not want to attend the hearing or medical examination; that if the patient does not attend then full reports often mean there is little point having a hearing; and that hearings place an unnecessary burden on community patients, who are likely to be quite capable of making the necessary decisions and are entitled to IMHAs and Legal Aid. It is anticipated that all community patients would be posted a form inviting them to consent to their case being decided without a hearing. In relation to the second proposal, it is intended that the power would be used when it is obvious that the tribunal lacks jurisdiction. Consultation runs from 1/6/11 to 23/8/11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/about/moj/advisory-groups/ts-committee-open-consultations.htm Tribunal Procedure Committee consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MHT Rule 35 consultation June 2011.pdf|Tribunal Procedure Committee, 'Consultation on proposed amendments to the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) Rules 2008 (SI 2008/2699)' (1/6/11)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Tribunal-Procedure-Committee-HESC-Rules-Consultation-Reply.pdf|Tribunal Procedure Committee, 'Response to consultation on proposed amendments to the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Health, Education and Social Care Chamber) Rules 2008 (SI 2008/2699) (1 June 2011 – 29 August 2011)' (February 2012)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ministry of Justice==&lt;br /&gt;
Consultation exercises carried out by the [[Ministry of Justice]]. See their [http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/consultations.htm Consultations page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Appointments and Diversity (21/11/11 to 13/2/12)===&lt;br /&gt;
Of relevance to mental health law are the following proposals: (1) Amending s63 [[Constitutional Reform Act 2005]], which currently requires judicial appointment to be 'solely on merit', to allow the [[Equality Act 2010]]'s protected characteristics (age, disability, gender reassignment, pregnancy and maternity, race, religion or belief, gender and sexual orientation) to be taken into account: where a 'selection assessment on a range of criteria rates them as equally capable of doing the job' then the presumption will be that protected characteristics will tip the balance in favour of those possessing them. (2) To provide more opportunity for appointments based on diversity, changing the tenure of fee-paid appointments so that they no longer last until retirement, but instead for a maximum of three five-year terms save in exceptional cases where there is a clear business need.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/press-releases/moj/newsrelease211111.htm Ministry of Justice, 'Clarke: Judiciary in need of modernisation and diversification' (press release, 21/11/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/judicial-appointments-cp19-2011.htm Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/consultations/judicial-appointments-consultation-1911.pdf Ministry of Justice, 'Appointments and Diversity: A Public Consultation' (Consultation paper CP19/2011, 21/11/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Fees in the High Court and Court of Appeal (15/11/11 to 7/2/12)===&lt;br /&gt;
'A consultation proposing changes to fees in the High Court and Court of Appeal Division. It is aimed at users of the High Court and Court of Appeal Civil Division, the legal profession, the judiciary, the advice sector and all with an interest in this area in England and Wales. The aim of these proposals is to charge users of these two jurisdictions more proportionally for the resource their cases consume, while protecting access to justice for the most vulnerable. This will reduce the taxpayer subsidy of the courts service.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/appeal-high-court-fees-cp15-2011.htm Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.thelawyer.com/moj-plans-massive-rise-in-court-fees/1010263.article Katy Dowell, 'MoJ plans massive rise in court fees' (The Lawyer, 16/11/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Office of the Public Guardian: Call for evidence: Not for profit delivery of deputyship services (4/8/11 to 27/10/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
The paper cites the 'Big Society' concept. The introduction states that 'Not for profit delivery of deputyship services has three purposes: (1) to understand the reasons behind the low take up amongst not-for-profit organisations of deputyship work; (2) to benchmark the costs of providing deputyship services within the sector; (3) to test interest in such organisations providing personal welfare deputyships in the future.' The appendix shows that the hope is to get the same service for approximately half the price of sa solicitor deputy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Call-for-evidence-panel-deputies.pdf|Office of the Public Guardian, 'Call for evidence: Not for profit delivery of deputyship services' (4/8/11)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/blogs/euro-blog/opg-calls-more-use-non-lawyers-avoid-costly-legal-solutions Catherine Baksi, 'OPG calls for more use of non-lawyers to avoid &amp;quot;costly legal solutions&amp;quot;' (9/8/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Court Of Protection: Authorised Officers: A consultation on the delegation of some decisions in the Court of Protection to court officers (28/6/11 to 20/9/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'A consultation on the proposal that an amendment be made to the Court of Protection Rules to provide for authorised officers to deal with specified types of applications. '&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MoJ Court of Protection Authorised Officers consultation.pdf|Ministry of Justice, 'Court Of Protection: Authorised Officers: A consultation on the delegation of some decisions in the Court of Protection to court officers' (consultation paper CP9/2011, June 2011)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Discussion paper on a proposed European Regulation on mutual recognition of protection measures in civil matters (30/6/11? to 8/7/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
'We are inviting views on a proposal for a European Regulation on mutual recognition of protection measures in civil matters. ... The Regulation aims to ensure that a protection measure (for example a non-molestation order)  provided to a person in one Member State is recognised and maintained when that person travels or moves to another Member State. It is hoped that this Regulation will provide a quick and efficient mechanism which will avoid the person requiring protection having to go through time consuming court procedures in the Member State of recognition, or give evidence on the same matters a second time in order to get equivalent protection in that State.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:MoJ Discussion Paper - European regulation on mutual recognition of protection measures.pdf|MoJ discussion paper]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:Proposed European regulation on mutual recognition of protection measures.pdf|The proposed measure]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Proposals on changes to the Office of the Public Guardian fees (28/2/11 to 21/5/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
'A consultation on the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) fees 2011/2012 which aims to ensure that the OPG fee policy remains fair, equitable and proportionate to the services being provided whilst at the same time reflecting the current economic climate. The proposed changes will help ensure that the fee structure remains fair and equitable whilst fully covering OPG costs. We are now seeking your views.' (MOJ website).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposals are listed on the OPG website as:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Raising the LPA Application to Register fee from £120 to £130;&lt;br /&gt;
*Implementing a new 'Resubmission Fee' of £65 each time an LPA is resubmitted to the OPG within 3 months of it being returned to the Applicant as invalid;&lt;br /&gt;
*Discontinuing the production of LPA office copies by the OPG, except in extreme and limited circumstances, and for a £50 fee;&lt;br /&gt;
*Removing the Application to Search the Registers fee;&lt;br /&gt;
*Replacing Type 1, 2A and 2 supervision fees with a flat fee of £320 and introducing an administration fee of £35 for those in type 3 requiring the de minimis level of supervision;&lt;br /&gt;
*Raising the maximum threshold of capital for those cases qualifying for Type 3 supervision from £16,000 to £21,000 over a period of 4 years;&lt;br /&gt;
*Introducing a new Fee Remissions policy of 50% for those who have a gross income of up to £12,000;&lt;br /&gt;
*Allowing the Public Guardian to vary the levels of fees payable in the future, examples of which could be:&lt;br /&gt;
:*Implementing a new discounted fee for any LPA applications that are submitted together;&lt;br /&gt;
:*Removing or discounting the LPA registration fee for Armed Service Personnel&lt;br /&gt;
*Renaming a number of OPG fees in order to make it clearer what they cover.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/opg-fees-consultation.htm MOJ consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.publicguardian.gov.uk/about/fees_consultation2011-12.htm OPG news item]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:OPG-fees-consultation-feb2011.pdf|Ministry of Justice, 'Office of the Public Guardian - fees 2011/2012: Consultation paper' (CP 16/10, 28/2/11)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Public Guardian (Fees, etc.) (Amendment) Regulations 2011]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[MCA Update emails]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Breaking the cycle: effective punishment, rehabilitation and sentencing of offenders (7/12/10 to 4/3/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;The Ministry of Justice Structural Reform Plan published in July 2010 set out a commitment to introduce a 'rehabilitation revolution' and conduct a review of sentencing policy. This consultation sets out the resulting proposals which aim to break the destructive cycle of crime and protect the public, through more effectively punishing and rehabilitating offenders and reforming the sentencing framework.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The proposals in relation to managing offenders with mental health problems are as follows: 'We want to ensure that our valuable resources are targeted on the people who are committed to changing their lives and being rehabilitated. In some cases, the criminal justice system is not the best place for them. This is particularly the case for offenders with mental health problems. We propose to: (a) work with the Department of Health and the Home Office to pilot and roll out liaison and diversion services nationally by 2014 for mentally ill offenders; and (b) increase the treatment capacity for offenders who present a high risk of harm where this is linked to severe personality disorders.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/breaking-cycle-071210.htm Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/breakingthecycle/ Another consultation page (more detailed content)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MOJ Breaking the Cycle.pdf|Ministry of Justice, 'Breaking the Cycle: Effective Punishment, Rehabilitation and Sentencing of Offenders', 7/12/10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] A Platform for the Future (30/11/10 to 25/2/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;In March 2010 an announcement was made that the Ministry of Justice would be bringing Her Majesty’s Courts Service (HMCS) and the Tribunals Service together, creating a single unified organisation. This consultation paper sets out the rationale for the creation of a new agency and explains what we believe the benefits will be. In seeking the views of the public on these benefits it also sets out what will remain the same following the creation of the agency.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/platform-future-301110.htm Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MoJ-Platform-future-consultation.pdf|Ministry of Justice, 'A Platform for the Future', ref CP14/10, 30/11/10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED]Proposals for the Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales (15/11/10 to 14/2/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This consultation seeks views on proposals for reform of legal aid in England and Wales. The proposals represent a radical, wide-ranging and ambitious programme of reform which aims to ensure that legal aid is targeted to those who need it most, for those cases in which legal advice or representation is justified. This consultation is aimed at providers of publicly funded legal services and others with an interest in the justice system.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In relation to mental health law the proposals are to (1) retain legal aid for mental health and capacity detention cases, including appeals to the First-tier (Mental Health) Tribunal, and onward appeals to the Upper Tribunal, and appeal as to the Court of Protection on deprivation of liberty issues; (2) retain legal aid for judicial review challenges; (3) remove legal aid for tort or other general damages claims unless the claims are of a very serious nature (paras 4.92 to 4.94). The summary for the scope of mental health law is that 'We propose to retain the current provision of Legal Help and Controlled Legal Representation' (Annex F). All civil hourly rates and fixed fees are to be reduced by 10% (para 7.6 to 7.7) and there are also proposals for reducing experts' fees (see chapter 8). There are less generous rules on financial eligibility and contributions, but these proposals will not affect those cases, such as Tribunal work, which are not subject to means testing (para 5.4). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/legal-aid-reform-151110.htm Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/newsrelease151110b.htm Press release: Clarke unveils plans for radical reform of justice] - 15/11/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Legal-aid-reform-consultation-MoJ-Nov-2010.pdf|Consultation document]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Legal-aid-reform-government-response-June 2011.pdf|Ministry of Justice, 'Reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales: the Government Response' (Cm 8072, June 2011)]]. Other related documents are also available. Some points particularly relevant to mental health law are: (1) There will be a 10% cut in all civil fees, including mental health law (para 34). (2) Advice and representation under the MHA 1983 or MCA 2005 will remain in scope (para 86). However claims involving tort or other general damages claims will be excluded  except where these meet the criteria for 'claims against public authorities' or 'claims arising out of allegations of the abuse of a child or vulnerable adult, or allegations of sexual assault' (para 87). The 'claims against public authorities' criteria allow legal advice and representation for claims (typically claims for damages) against public authorities concerning 'abuse of position or power' or 'significant breach of human rights' (no longer for 'serious wrong-doing') (para 10ff). (3) Legal aid will remain available for judicial review and habeas corpus (subject to immaterial exceptions) (para 88ff).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill 2011]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Proposals for reform of civil litigation funding and costs in England and Wales (15/11/10 to 14/2/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This consultation seeks views on implementing a package of Lord Justice Jackson's proposals for reforming conditional fee agreements and other aspects of civil litigation funding and costs.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/jackson-review-151110.htm Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/newsrelease151110b.htm Press release: Clarke unveils plans for radical reform of justice] - 15/11/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Jackson-consultation-paper-MoJ-Nov-2010.pdf|Consultation document]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Office of the Public Guardian: Amendments to secondary legislation (17/12/09 to 9/3/10)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This consultation paper represents the next step in the review process of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and addresses areas of legislation and policy that in practice have not worked as well as intended. The proposed changes will help the Act meet its aims and objectives. The OPG intends to implement them on the 1 April 2010 and is now seeking views.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/opg-amendments-legislation-consultation.htm Consultation page] - including response&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Legal aid: funding reforms (20/8/09 to 12/11/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/legal-aid-funding-reforms.htm Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Responses published 16/12/09.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Response re experts' fees published 3/3/10. See bottom of consultation page and:&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/newsrelease030310a.htm Press release: Major new project on expert witness fees] - 3/3/10 - New project entitled &amp;quot;Analysis and control of expert witness fees paid in legal aid work&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] The future of the Parole Board (20/7/09 to 20/11/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Since its creation in 1968, the role of the [[Parole Board]] has changed significantly, from an advisory body to a court-like decision-making body.  It has evolved in light of legislative changes, court judgments and changing caseloads, but its functions, status and resources have not been systematically considered in light of these changes. This consultation paper represents an opportunity to address this, and consider whether any changes to its sponsorship and role would support the Parole Board in carrying out its functions more effectively and efficiently.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/future-parole-board.htm Consultation documents on MoJ website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Legal Aid: refocusing on priority cases (16/7/09 to 8/10/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;This paper sets out proposals for reforming the legal aid rules to ensure that limited resources are focused on priority cases. The changes proposed include strengthening public interest considerations in deciding whether to grant civil legal aid; ceasing to provide funding for low priority civil and criminal matters, where issues can be resolved instead through complaints procedures or ombudsman schemes; restricting access to civil legal aid for those not resident in the UK; and notifying the other side when civil legal aid is applied for to discourage fraudulent applications.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_11318.asp?page=1 CLS News: Important changes to the Funding Code] - 1/4/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/docs/legal-aid-refocusing-final-response-web.pdf Response to consultation] - Feb 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.justice.gov.uk/consultations/legal-aid-refocusing-priority-cases.htm Consultation documents on MoJ website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[https://consult.legalservices.gov.uk/inovem/consult.ti/prioritycases/consultationHome Consultation summary on LSC website]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Amendments to the Community Legal Service (Financial) Regulations 2000 (closed 17/2/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The plan is to increase income eligibility limits by 5%, and to introduce non-means-tested legal aid for COP proceedings for those deprived of their liberty, from April 2009. Closing date 17/2/09.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Draft CLS (Financial) (Amdt) Regs 2009.doc|draft Regulations]] &lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Consultation Letter regarding Uprating 2008 and Changes to Financial Regulations.DOC|consultation letter]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The response to the consultation is included in the explanatory memorandum to the following Regulations:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Community Legal Service (Financial) (Amendment) Regulations 2009]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Mental Capacity Act 2005: forms, supervision and fees (23/10/08 - 15/1/09)===&lt;br /&gt;
Responses published: 11 March 2009 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A consultation on proposed changes to three areas of the work of the Office of the Public Guardian and the Court of Protection following the implementation of the Mental Capacity Act: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1. redesign of the Lasting Power of Attorney forms&lt;br /&gt;
2. restructuring of the Supervision of Deputies by the Public Guardian&lt;br /&gt;
3. alterations to the fee structure. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This consultation was the initial stage of a wider 12-18 month investigation into the implementation of the Mental Capacity Act. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the following for details:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/reviewing-mental-capacity-act.htm MoJ consultation page, including response] (the text above is taken from here)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/newsrelease110309a.htm MoJ press release: &amp;quot;Power of Attorney forms to be cheaper and simpler&amp;quot;] - summary of the consultation response&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Office of Fair Trading==&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[Office of Fair Trading]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Mental Capacity Guidance (6/12/10 to 4/3/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Following the consultation on irresponsible lending the OFT identified a need to provide further clarity on the issue of mental capacity as it impacts on borrowing decisions.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.oft.gov.uk/news-and-updates/press/2010/127-10 Office of Fair Trading, 'OFT launches mental capacity guidance consultation', Press release 6/12/10]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.oft.gov.uk/OFTwork/consultations/current/mental-capacity/ Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:OFT mental capacity consultation.pdf|Office of Fair Trading, 'Mental capacity: Draft OFT guidance for creditors: A consultation', 6/12/10]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.mind.org.uk/campaigns_and_issues/current_campaigns/in_the_red Mind's response]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.oft.gov.uk/news-and-updates/press/today?prid=823788 OFT press release: OFT publishes mental capacity guidance (28/9/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Wales==&lt;br /&gt;
See also: [[Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010]]. (Some of the circular emails reproduced there relate to consultations.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Consultation on Mental Health (Regional Provision) (Wales) Regulations 2012 (26/9/11 to 16/12/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
'This consultation seeks your views on regulations which would enable Local Health Boards (LHBs) and local authorities in Wales to enter into regional working arrangements.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wales.gov.uk/consultations/healthsocialcare/regulations2012/?skip=1&amp;amp;lang=en Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Consultation on the draft code of practice to parts 2 and 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010 (18/10/11 to 16/01/12)===&lt;br /&gt;
'This consultation seeks views on a draft Code of Practice for care and treatment planning. It also covers reassessment for secondary mental health services under the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010. Part 2 of the Measure is concerned with: (1) the appointment of care coordinators as part of the process of planning and coordinating care; and (2) care and treatment plans for people receiving secondary mental health services. Part 3 of the Measure is concerned with: (1) former users of secondary mental health services; and (2) providing a right for them to refer themselves back to secondary services for assessment directly. The draft code sets out guiding principles and practice guidance for the operation of the Measure.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wales.gov.uk/consultations/healthsocialcare/mental/?lang=en Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:MH (Wales) Measure Code of Practice consultation.zip|Consultation documents]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Consultation on proposed Mental Health (Wales) Measure (29/3/10 to 14/5/10)===&lt;br /&gt;
As part of its Stage 1 consideration, the National Assembly for Wales’ Legislation Committee No. 3 is calling for evidence on the general principles of the proposed Mental Health (Wales) Measure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.assemblywales.org/bus-home/bus-legislation/bus-leg-measures/business-legislation-measures-mhs-2/business-legislation-measures-mh-consultation.htm Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Consultation: Mental Health (Independent Mental Health Advocates) (Wales) Regulations 2011 (21/2/11 to 16/5/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
'Part 4 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010 expands the statutory independent mental health advocacy scheme established by the 1983 Act.  Patients subject to certain &amp;quot;short term&amp;quot; sections of the 1983 Act, and those in hospital informally (i.e. not under compulsion) are able to access the service. The Welsh Assembly Government is proposing to make Regulations connected to the expanded independent mental health advocacy scheme.  This will relate to the provision, appointment and approval of advocates. It will also say which people advocates can talk to in undertaking their role of supporting patients. This consultation seeks your views on these draft Regulations.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wales.gov.uk/consultations/healthsocialcare/advocates/?skip=1&amp;amp;lang=en Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:WAG Advocates consultation documents.zip|Consultation documents]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Consultation: Mental Health (Assessment of Former Users of Secondary Mental Health Services) (Wales) Regulations 2011 (21/2/11 to 16/5/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
'Part 3 of the Mental Health (Wales) Measure 2010 is concerned with mental health assessments for former users of secondary mental health services.  The Welsh Assembly Government is proposing to make Regulations under this part of the Measure which will set out certain eligibility criteria for such assessments.  For example, the length of time a person will be eligible for such an assessment following their discharge from services. This consultation seeks your views on these draft regulations.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wales.gov.uk/consultations/healthsocialcare/assessment/?lang=en Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:WAG Assessment consultation documents.zip|Consultation documents]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Consultation: Mental Health (Care Coordination and Care and Treatment Planning) (Wales) Regulations 2011 (21/2/11 to 16/5/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
'[This consultation] is concerned with the coordination of secondary mental health services, and care and treatment planning for secondary mental health service users.  The Welsh Assembly Government is proposing to make Regulations connected to Part 2 of the Measure. This relates to the appointment of care coordinators and the making, reviewing and revising of care and treatment plans. This consultation seeks your views on these draft regulations.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wales.gov.uk/consultations/healthsocialcare/care/?lang=en Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:WAG Care consultation documents.zip|Consultation documents]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Consultation on a Separate Legal Jurisdiction for Wales (27/3/12 to 19/6/12)===&lt;br /&gt;
The Welsh Government are consulting on making things even more unnecessarily complicated, by creating an entirely separate legal jurisdiction for Wales.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://wales.gov.uk/consultations/finance/seplegaljurisdiction/?lang=en Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Northern Ireland==&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Consultation on an Equality Impact Assessment for New Mental Capacity Legislation (30/7/10 - 31/10/10)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Following publication of the Bamford Review report, A Comprehensive Legislative Framework and consultation on the Department's proposal, A Legislative Framework for Mental Capacity and Mental Health Legislation, the Minister in September 2009 announced his intention of preparing a single Bill encompassing mental capacity and mental health provisions.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.dhsspsni.gov.uk/showconsultations?txtid=43469 Consultation document]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.northernireland.gov.uk/news-dhssps-30072010-mcgimpsey-launches-eqia Related press release]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Consultation Document: Delivering Excellence: Achieving Recovery: A Professional Framework for the Mental Health Nursing Profession in Northern Ireland (2010-2015) (closes 10/9/10)===&lt;br /&gt;
Consultation run by NI's Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.dhsspsni.gov.uk/showconsultations?txtid=43243 Consultation documents]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Scotland==&lt;br /&gt;
===Consultation on Certification of Incapacity for Medical Treatment under Part 5 Section 47 Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000===&lt;br /&gt;
'This consultation seeks views on four issues on Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 Part 5 in relation to medical treatment. The issues are: widening the range of institutions which can offer training, whether dentists should be required to undertake training for this purpose; whether multiple section 47 medical treatment certificates should be required in some circumstances; and whether other medical practitioners not specified should be enabled to certify incapacity for medical treatment'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2011/07/18125047/6 Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===[CLOSED] Disclosure of Information to Victims of Mentally Disordered Offenders (30/8/10 - 22/11/10)===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;Consultation on the possible introduction of a scheme for victims of mentally disordered offenders similar to the current criminal justice Victim Notification Scheme&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/08/27104119/0 Consultation page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Rule 58 consultation (21/3/11 - 16/5/11)===&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Scottish rule 58 consultation.pdf|The Scottish Government, 'Scottish Government Consultation: Amendment to Rule 58 of the Mental Health Tribunal for Scotland (Practice and Procedure) (No. 2) Rules 2005: Rule 58: Power to Decide Case Without a Hearing' (March 2011)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Scottish Government is consulting on plans to increase the availability of rule 58 which allows the Tribunal, if all parties agree in writing, to dispose of a case without an oral hearing. The three proposed options, all dispensing with the need for agreement and presumably with the intention of cutting costs, are: (1) any party wanting a hearing must show cause why a hearing is necessary, or (2) as option 1 except the patient has the automatic right to hearing if requested, or (3) as option 1 except the hearing will take place unless the patient positively elects not to have one. It is envisaged that the rule would be used 'where there is no real dispute between the parties'.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2011/06/15145626/0 Consultation responses]. On this page, published 15/6/11, can be found all the responses to this consultation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Resources]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates</id>
		<title>Updates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T19:29:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you have anything which is not yet on the internet (e.g. court results or transcripts) then please send it in (see [[Help|Help page]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping up to date==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Email.jpg] You can now subscribe to free '''[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Email updates]''', on an occasional or monthly basis. &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Discussion http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Discussion.png] Join the new [[Discussion|email discussion list]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/t_mini-a.png] Receive updates as soon as they are added by following us on Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline @mhlonline]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/RSS.gif] Subscribe to the website's [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed RSS update feed]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/E-book_16x16.png] Receive monthly updates delivered automatically to your [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Kindle e-reader]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent updates on website==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bullet_feed title=&amp;quot;Mental Health Law Online Update RSS&amp;quot; desc=&amp;quot;What's new on the site&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (16): Martha Spurrier, 'The great safety net' (Solicitors Journal, 2/4/12). Reproduced by kind permission. See [[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (15): LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12). The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (14): Steve Doughty, 'Father of two with motor neurone disease wins right to die by blinking his eye after judge's landmark ruling' (Daily Mail, 1/5/12). See [[Settled cases and forthcoming judgments#Re XB (advance decision, Theis J)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (13): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Parkins (2012) EWCA Crim 856, (2012) MHLO 50}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (12): PI quantum case. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (11): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (10): PVS case. {{pagesummary|Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (9): Best interests case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (8): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (7): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (6): Simon Edwards, 'Capacity and tenancies/licences' (39 Essex Street, 19/4/12). See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (5): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 21, May 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP) — Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33 — Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP) — Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47 — Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48 — Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (4): Rosalind English, 'Delay in transferring mental health patient for treatment amounted to &amp;quot;inhumane treatment&amp;quot;' (3/5/12). This article concludes: 'This is a prime example of using Article 3 as a social and economic right, not a basic civil right, and thus extended leaves publicly funded authorities to carry out difficult jobs with threats of litigation looming on all sides. The UK courts recognised this claim for what it was, and dismissed it. Strasbourg should have done the same.' See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (3): Mental Health Cop Blog, 'MS v UK' (4/5/12). This article is in favour of the judgment and makes points in relation to (1) place of safety arguments, (2) accessing psychiatric beds, (3) media coverage, and (4) implications. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (2): ECtHR, 'Prolonged police detention of mentally-ill man without adequate medical care violated his Convention rights' (Press release ref ECHR 195 (2012), 3/5/12). This is the court's summary of the judgment. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (1): Article 3 case. {{pagesummary|MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (25): Westminster Hall debate on Litigation Friends (HC Deb, 21 March 2012, c244WH). See [[Official Solicitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (24): Irwin Mitchell Solicitors, 'Mother Proved Right As Son Freed From Padded Room Hell Makes Progress' (29/3/12). 'Court Anonymity Order Lifted Naming Wigan Borough Council As Local Authority Which Locked Up Her Autistic Son.' See [[Re C; C v Wigan Borough Council (2011) EWHC 1539 (Admin)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (23): HMCTS, 'Mental Health Tribunal Stakeholder Bulletin April 2012' (17/4/12). The following are the headings: Contacting the Tribunal; Reports Processing Team; Section 2 Cases; Scanned Reports; Password protection; Notification to the Tribunal of Patient Withdrawals and RC Discharges; HQ2 Questionnaire; FTT Mental Health Policy update; Clerking; Facilities for the Hearing impaired; Olympics and Paralympics 2012 and the potential impact; Relist Team; Customer Survey; Feedback. In relation to the new forms: '''Form CNL2''' ('Case Notification Letter 2'), which from May 2012 will be sent to the representative with the RC's report, demands that the representative complete '''Form HQ2''' ('Hearing Questionnaire 2'). HQ2 asks the following questions: (1) What is the Patient seeking from the tribunal, and what are the principal areas of dispute? (2) Do you intend to call an independent expert? If so, please give details. (3) What is your hearing time estimate? (4) Would this case benefit from pre-hearing review by a tribunal judge? If so, please say why (e.g. change of status under the Act, or recent hospital transfer). (5) Are there any other matters that you feel that the panel should know in order to dispose of this matter justly, fairly and without delay? (6) Does the patient need an interpreter? If so, please give details of language and dialect. See [[Mental Health Tribunal#Tribunal member and stakeholder email bulletin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (22): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 20, April 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: Austin v UK 39692/09 [2012] ECHR 459, [2012] MHLO 22, DD v Lithuania 13469/06 [2012] ECHR 254, [2012] MHLO 29, DL v A Local Authority [2012] EWCA Civ 253, [2012] MHLO 32, Long v Rodman [2012] EWHC 347 (Ch), [2012] MHLO 12, ZH v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 604 (QB), [2012] MHLO 25, Seaton v Seddon [2012] EWHC 735 (Ch), [2012] MHLO 28, Coombs v Dorset NHS PCT [2012] EWHC 521 (QB), [2012] MHLO 13. Also mentioned are: CQC report on DOLS; Listing Deprivation of Liberty Safeguarding cases; COP Cases Online and all previous newsletters in one PDF document. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (21): LPA case. {{pagesummary|Re Drew (2012) MHLO 45 (LPA)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (20): LPA case. {{pagesummary|Re Bloom (2012) MHLO 44 (LPA)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (19): LPA case. {{pagesummary|Re Batchelor (2012) MHLO 43 (LPA)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (18): CQC, 'CQC inspector dismissed for gross misconduct' (27/4/12). 'A CQC inspector has been dismissed for gross misconduct after an internal investigation revealed that the impartiality of their regulatory judgements had been seriously compromised. This came to light as a result of whistle-blowing information to the CQC. No additional detail can be provided as CQC has now referred this matter to the police.' See [[CQC]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (17): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v B (2012) EWCA Crim 770, (2012) MHLO 42}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (16): Immigration appeal with mental health aspect. {{pagesummary|R (HA (Nigeria)) v SSHD (2012) EWHC 979 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 41}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (15): Sentence appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Ahmed (2012) EWCA Crim 708, (2012) MHLO 40}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (14): Costs. {{pagesummary|R (Sutton) v Calderdale Council (2012) EWHC 637 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 39}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (13): Immigration appeal with mental health aspect. {{pagesummary|MM (Zimbabwe) v SSHD (2012) EWCA Civ 279, (2012) MHLO 38}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (12): Extradition case with mental health aspect. {{pagesummary|Republic of South Africa v Dewani (2012) EWHC 842 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 37}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (11): Southern Irish case. {{pagesummary|L v Clinical Director of St Patrick's University Hospital (2012) IEHC 15, (2012) MHLO 36}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (10): Southern Irish case from 2008. {{pagesummary|Han v President of the Circuit Court (2008) IEHC 160}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (9): HMCTS, 'T128: Options for your Tribunal Referral Hearing: Community Patients' (April 2012). This is the form which is sent to CTO patients inviting them to cancel their tribunal referral hearings. See [[Tribunal Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (8): New caselaw category. See [[:Category:Statutory will cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (7): Statutory will case. {{pagesummary|Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Barbara Rich of 5 Stone Buildings&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (6): Updated guidance. HMCTS, 'Room Specification Recommendations for Tribunal Hearings' (March 2012). See [[Mental Health Tribunal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (5): The LSC is consulting on their proposal to discontinue funding for the Specialist Support Service, as a result of conceding a judicial review of their decision to do so. The consultation runs until 11/5/12. The specialist support service for mental health is run by Scott Moncrieff Solicitors, and is available from Monday to Friday, 10am to 4pm, on 0844 800 3364. Related articles: Legal Aid Handbook Blog, 'LSC concede judicial review; specialist support reprieved' (1/3/12); Legal Aid Handbook Blog, 'Weekly round up' (1/4/12). See [[Consultations#Legal Services Commission]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (4): Sentence appeal case. {{pagesummary|R v Levey (2012) EWCA Crim 657, (2012) MHLO 34}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (3): Capacity/PI case. {{pagesummary|Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (2): Southern Irish case. {{pagesummary|Re JO'B; HSE v JO'B (2011) IEHC 73}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (1): Mind, 'Legal enewsletter' (Issue 11, April 2012). This newsletter contains: (1) Articles: (a) Making best interests decisions under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, (b) Listening to experience - Mind's report into acute and crisis mental healthcare, (c) The right to life under Article 2 of the ECHR, (d) The right to independent living - is it working?; (2) Case reports: (a) SSJ v RB (2011) EWCA Civ 1608, (b) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257, (c) O'Cathail v Transport for London (2012) EWCA Civ 92; (3) Updates: (a) Discrimination news, (b) Section 117 MHA 1983 and the Health and Social Care Bill 2012, (c) Changes to mental health tribunal rules and procedure, (d) Care Quality Commission, (e) Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CPID) Toolkit, (e) Proposed DVLA changes: fitness to drive, (f) Court of Protection. See [[Mind (Charity)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*26/04/12 (2): Turning Point, a health and social care charity, has an opportunity for a part-time Mental Health Act Administrator (22.5 hours) at a new 28-person Independent Hospital in Mastin Moor, Chesterfield. The closing date for applications is 10/5/12. See [https://turningpoint.ppsworks.co.uk/apply/index1.php?online_ref=31Dl34M6 Turning Point website] for details and to apply. See [[Jobs]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*26/04/12 (1): New COP Practice Direction. {{pagesummary|COP Practice Direction: Preparation of Bundles}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*25/04/12 (1): The Mental Health Lawyers Association will be running their successful two-day course for membership of the Law Society's Mental Health Accreditation Scheme (formerly the MHRT panel) in Leeds on Monday 18/6/12 and Tuesday 19/6/12. Price: £300 (members); £390 (non-members); £250 (for third and subsequent members in a group). CPD: 12 SRA-accredited hours. See MHLA website for further details and booking form. See [[Events]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*24/04/12 (2): {{pagesummary|Health and Social Care Act 2012}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*24/04/12 (1): {{pagesummary|Mental Health (Hospital, Guardianship and Treatment) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2012}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*19/04/12 (2): Please subscribe to Mental Health Law Online's new discussion list. This is separate from the email updates list, which remains unchanged. The discussion list will cover all aspects of mental health law in England and Wales, from the Mental Health Act 1983 and the Mental Health Tribunal, to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Court of Protection. See [[Discussion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*19/04/12 (1): Mental Health Law Online is six years old today! Many thanks to all readers, contributors and subscribers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*18/04/12 (2): Legal Action articles on the required content of social circumstances reports and responsible authority statements, reproduced by kind permission: (1) Christopher Curran, Malcolm Golightley and Phil Fennell, 'Social circumstances reports for mental health tribunals - Part 1' (Legal Action, June 2010); (2) Christopher Curran, Malcolm Golightley and Phil Fennell, 'Social circumstances reports for mental health tribunals - Part 1' (Legal Action, July 2010); (3) Christopher Curran, Phil Fennell and Simon Burrows, 'Responsible authority statements for mental health tribunals' (Legal Action, March 2012). See [[Tribunal Rules]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*18/04/12 (1): David Hewitt, 'Purpose alone can no longer determine if there is a deprivation of liberty' (Solicitors Journal, 16/4/12). This article argues that the reference in the Court of Appeal decision in Cheshire West to 'purpose' as being relevant to the objective element of deprivation of liberty is not supported by the subsequent ECtHR decision in Austin. See [[Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (4): New version. {{pagesummary|Guidance Booklet: Reports for Mental Health Tribunals}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (3): Mark Hinchliffe, 'Important Notice' (29/3/12). This document describes the changes made by the [[Tribunal Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2012]] on 6/4/12. In relation to the tribunal's requirement, in CTO reference cases, for evidence from the RC about the patient's capacity to decide not to attend or be represented, it states: 'We do not see that this should present a difficulty or a conflict of interest. The Responsible Clinician, as an expert witness, has no &amp;quot;interest&amp;quot; one way or the other and, in any event, has a responsibility to assess capacity in many situations...' See [[Mental Health Tribunal#Messages from Deputy Chamber President]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (2): New Practice Direction on reports. {{pagesummary|Practice Direction: First-tier Tribunal Health Education and Social Care Chamber: Statements and Reports in Mental Health Cases}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (1): LSC, 'New Keycard 48 to be introduced from 9 April' (5/4/12). Keycard 48 reflects an increase in the standard dependants' allowances assessed for a partner or child living within the client's household; the new rates are applicable to new applications or further assessments made on or after 9 April 2012. Eligibility limits are unchanged. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*06/04/12 (1): Case (detained patient paying for treatment): transcript and neutral citation now available. {{pagesummary|Coombs v Dorset NHS PCT (2012) EWHC 521 (QB), (2012) MHLO 13}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/04/12 (1): The following was asked on a discussion page on 2/4/12. 'Does anyone know: if a CTO inadvertently lapses (i.e. is not renewed by accident) does the original section 3 which the CTO was suspending come back into being? I know if you discharge someone from the CTO that discharges from the section 3. If you revoke the CTO then the Section 3 will come back into being. But if the CTO just lapses does that also mean that the Section 3 that was suspended has lapsed by default as well? I don't know the answer but if anyone does that would be really helpful. Thanks'. The answer is that when the CTO expires the s3 ceases to have effect: see [[s20B]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*01/04/12 (1): The government have announced that from 1 April 2012, following the Court of Appeal decision in [[Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257]] and the subsequent High Court decision in [[Re C; C v Blackburn and Darwen Borough Council (2011) EWHC 3321 (COP)]], the entire Mental Health Act 1983 will be repealed. The government spokesman, Avril Poisson, said: “Those subject to the Act lack capacity, as demonstrated by their inability to comply with voluntary inpatient treatment, and they should be treated equally to others who lack capacity. Recent case law on deprivation of liberty has shown that the relevant contrast when assessing ‘relative normality’ is not ‘the ordinary adult going about the kind of life which the able-bodied man or woman on the Clapham omnibus would normally expect to lead’ but rather ‘the kind of lives that people like X would normally expect to lead’ (Cheshire West, para 102). Periods of hospital inpatient treatment are normal, as an inevitable corollary of psychiatric disabilities: during those periods there are no realistic alternatives and no deprivation of liberty within the meaning of [[Article 5]] of the European Convention.” She said that the 29-year-old Act would be abolished with immediate effect because it is no longer fit for purpose, and that the “so-called” deprivation of liberty safeguards would also come under scrutiny. “When I use a word,” she said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” '''[Hope you enjoyed the April Fools' Day joke!]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*30/03/12 (1): The March 2012 CPD questionnaire is now online. Obtain 12 accredited CPD points for £60. See [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/cpd/ CPD scheme]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (6): CQC, 'The operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in England, 2010/11' (March 2012). Key findings: '(1) 8,982 applications to deprive a person of their liberty were processed, of which 50 per cent were authorised. (2) Many services have developed good practice on the use of the safeguards, especially in involving people and their families in the decision-making process, but some were confused as to when restraints or restrictions on a person amounted to a deprivation of liberty. (3) Between a third and a quarter of care homes had not provided their staff with training on the safeguards, and in some cases only the manager had received training. (4) Most hospitals had held some training, but the proportion of staff involved ranged between 20-100 per cent.' See also: CQC, 'Summary: The operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in England, 2010/11' (March 2012); Lucy Series, 'CQC's second monitoring report on the deprivation of liberty safeguards' (Small Places blog, 27/3/12). See [[CQC]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (5): LSC, 'Accreditation contribution scheme update' (28/3/12). From 2/4/12 the LSC will reduce the amount it contributes to the costs of mental health panel membership by 50% to £73.44; from 1/4/13 there will be no contribution at all. In recent weeks the Law Society's accreditation fees doubled to £500 plus VAT. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (4): Case transcript. {{pagesummary|A London Borough v VT (2011) EWHC 3806 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (3): Case transcript. {{pagesummary|EB v RC (2011) EWHC 3805 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (2): Neutral citation available. {{pagesummary|Re JDS; KGS v JDS (2012) EWHC 302 (COP), (2012) MHLO 4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (1): Case summary. {{pagesummary|DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/bullet_feed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update archive===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[March 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[February 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[January 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Updates|Previous updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/DL_v_A_Local_Authority_(2012)_EWCA_Civ_253,_(2012)_MHLO_32</id>
		<title>DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/DL_v_A_Local_Authority_(2012)_EWCA_Civ_253,_(2012)_MHLO_32"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T19:28:30Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: /* External link */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;''The local authority brought proceedings under the High Court’s inherent jurisdiction to protect his parents from DL; these proceedings could not have been brought under the [[MCA 2005]] as the parents did not lack capacity under that Act; DL argued that the MCA, by establishing a comprehensive scheme for adults, had displaced the inherent jurisdiction. (1) The inherent jurisdiction of the High Court in relation to vulnerable adults survives the implementation of the MCA 2005, which only relates to adults who lack capacity as defined in the Act. (2) The absence of any express provision in relation to the inherent jurisdiction implies that it continues to be available, as 'the great safety net', where the Act does not apply; in any event, there is a strong policy justification, the protection of vulnerable adults, for this conclusion. (3) The jurisdiction is in part aimed at enhancing or liberating the autonomy of a vulnerable adult whose autonomy has been compromised by a reason other than mental incapacity because they are (a) under constraint; or (b) subject to coercion or undue influence; or (c) for some other reason deprived of the capacity to make the relevant decision or disabled from making a free choice, or incapacitated or disabled from giving or expressing a real and genuine consent.''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related judgments==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[A Local Authority v DL (2011) EWHC 1022 (Fam)]]&lt;br /&gt;
***[[A Local Authority v DL (2010) EWHC 2675 (Fam)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==ICLR==&lt;br /&gt;
{{ICLR|DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Other==&lt;br /&gt;
Judgment: 28/3/12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Hearing: 16/1/12&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External links==&lt;br /&gt;
{{bailii|(2012) EWCA Civ 253}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[http://cases.iclr.co.uk/nxt/gateway.dll/WLR%20Dailies/WLRD%202011/wlrd2012-101 ICLR]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:Solicitors Journal - Martha Spurrier - The great safety net.pdf|Martha Spurrier, 'The great safety net' (Solicitors Journal, 2/4/12)]]. Reproduced by kind permission&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Other capacity cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Brief summary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2012 cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/A_Local_Authority_v_DL_(2010)_EWHC_2675_(Fam)</id>
		<title>A Local Authority v DL (2010) EWHC 2675 (Fam)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/A_Local_Authority_v_DL_(2010)_EWHC_2675_(Fam)"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T19:28:10Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: /* External link */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Scope of inherent jurisdiction. [Summary required.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related judgments==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[A Local Authority v DL (2011) EWHC 1022 (Fam)]]&lt;br /&gt;
***[[A Local Authority v DL (2010) EWHC 2675 (Fam)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Official summary==&lt;br /&gt;
{{COP2010|22}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Citations==&lt;br /&gt;
A Local Authority v DL and others (vulnerable adults: non molestation injunction) [2010] All ER (D) 280 (Oct)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In re L (Vulnerable Adults with Capacity: Court's Jurisdiction) [2011] Fam 189&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External link==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2010/2675.html Bailii]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This case doesn't fit well into any of the current case-law categories (which will be re-organised at some stage).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Other capacity cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:No summary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2010 cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/A_Local_Authority_v_DL_(2010)_EWHC_2675_(Fam)</id>
		<title>A Local Authority v DL (2010) EWHC 2675 (Fam)</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/A_Local_Authority_v_DL_(2010)_EWHC_2675_(Fam)"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T19:27:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Scope of inherent jurisdiction. [Summary required.]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related judgments==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32]]&lt;br /&gt;
**[[A Local Authority v DL (2011) EWHC 1022 (Fam)]]&lt;br /&gt;
***[[A Local Authority v DL (2010) EWHC 2675 (Fam)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Official summary==&lt;br /&gt;
{{COP2010|22}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Citations==&lt;br /&gt;
A Local Authority v DL and others (vulnerable adults: non molestation injunction) [2010] All ER (D) 280 (Oct)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In re L (Vulnerable Adults with Capacity: Court's Jurisdiction) [2011] Fam 189&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External link==&lt;br /&gt;
[http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2010/2675.html Bailii]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Media:Solicitors Journal - Martha Spurrier - The great safety net.pdf|Martha Spurrier, 'The great safety net' (Solicitors Journal, 2/4/12)]]. Reproduced by kind permission&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This case doesn't fit well into any of the current case-law categories (which will be re-organised at some stage).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Other capacity cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:No summary]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Transcript]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:2010 cases]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:Solicitors_Journal_-_Martha_Spurrier_-_The_great_safety_net.pdf</id>
		<title>File:Solicitors Journal - Martha Spurrier - The great safety net.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/File:Solicitors_Journal_-_Martha_Spurrier_-_The_great_safety_net.pdf"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T19:26:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates</id>
		<title>Updates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T15:19:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you have anything which is not yet on the internet (e.g. court results or transcripts) then please send it in (see [[Help|Help page]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping up to date==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Email.jpg] You can now subscribe to free '''[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Email updates]''', on an occasional or monthly basis. &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Discussion http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Discussion.png] Join the new [[Discussion|email discussion list]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/t_mini-a.png] Receive updates as soon as they are added by following us on Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline @mhlonline]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/RSS.gif] Subscribe to the website's [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed RSS update feed]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/E-book_16x16.png] Receive monthly updates delivered automatically to your [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Kindle e-reader]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent updates on website==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bullet_feed title=&amp;quot;Mental Health Law Online Update RSS&amp;quot; desc=&amp;quot;What's new on the site&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (15): LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12). The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (14): Steve Doughty, 'Father of two with motor neurone disease wins right to die by blinking his eye after judge's landmark ruling' (Daily Mail, 1/5/12). See [[Settled cases and forthcoming judgments#Re XB (advance decision, Theis J)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (13): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Parkins (2012) EWCA Crim 856, (2012) MHLO 50}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (12): PI quantum case. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (11): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (10): PVS case. {{pagesummary|Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (9): Best interests case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (8): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (7): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)}} Transcript provided by Alex Ruck Keene of 39 Essex Street Chambers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (6): Simon Edwards, 'Capacity and tenancies/licences' (39 Essex Street, 19/4/12). See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (5): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 21, May 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP) — Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33 — Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP) — Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47 — Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48 — Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (4): Rosalind English, 'Delay in transferring mental health patient for treatment amounted to &amp;quot;inhumane treatment&amp;quot;' (3/5/12). This article concludes: 'This is a prime example of using Article 3 as a social and economic right, not a basic civil right, and thus extended leaves publicly funded authorities to carry out difficult jobs with threats of litigation looming on all sides. The UK courts recognised this claim for what it was, and dismissed it. Strasbourg should have done the same.' See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (3): Mental Health Cop Blog, 'MS v UK' (4/5/12). This article is in favour of the judgment and makes points in relation to (1) place of safety arguments, (2) accessing psychiatric beds, (3) media coverage, and (4) implications. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (2): ECtHR, 'Prolonged police detention of mentally-ill man without adequate medical care violated his Convention rights' (Press release ref ECHR 195 (2012), 3/5/12). This is the court's summary of the judgment. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (1): Article 3 case. {{pagesummary|MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (25): Westminster Hall debate on Litigation Friends (HC Deb, 21 March 2012, c244WH). See [[Official Solicitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (24): Irwin Mitchell Solicitors, 'Mother Proved Right As Son Freed From Padded Room Hell Makes Progress' (29/3/12). 'Court Anonymity Order Lifted Naming Wigan Borough Council As Local Authority Which Locked Up Her Autistic Son.' See [[Re C; C v Wigan Borough Council (2011) EWHC 1539 (Admin)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (23): HMCTS, 'Mental Health Tribunal Stakeholder Bulletin April 2012' (17/4/12). The following are the headings: Contacting the Tribunal; Reports Processing Team; Section 2 Cases; Scanned Reports; Password protection; Notification to the Tribunal of Patient Withdrawals and RC Discharges; HQ2 Questionnaire; FTT Mental Health Policy update; Clerking; Facilities for the Hearing impaired; Olympics and Paralympics 2012 and the potential impact; Relist Team; Customer Survey; Feedback. In relation to the new forms: '''Form CNL2''' ('Case Notification Letter 2'), which from May 2012 will be sent to the representative with the RC's report, demands that the representative complete '''Form HQ2''' ('Hearing Questionnaire 2'). HQ2 asks the following questions: (1) What is the Patient seeking from the tribunal, and what are the principal areas of dispute? (2) Do you intend to call an independent expert? If so, please give details. (3) What is your hearing time estimate? (4) Would this case benefit from pre-hearing review by a tribunal judge? If so, please say why (e.g. change of status under the Act, or recent hospital transfer). (5) Are there any other matters that you feel that the panel should know in order to dispose of this matter justly, fairly and without delay? (6) Does the patient need an interpreter? If so, please give details of language and dialect. See [[Mental Health Tribunal#Tribunal member and stakeholder email bulletin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (22): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 20, April 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: Austin v UK 39692/09 [2012] ECHR 459, [2012] MHLO 22, DD v Lithuania 13469/06 [2012] ECHR 254, [2012] MHLO 29, DL v A Local Authority [2012] EWCA Civ 253, [2012] MHLO 32, Long v Rodman [2012] EWHC 347 (Ch), [2012] MHLO 12, ZH v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 604 (QB), [2012] MHLO 25, Seaton v Seddon [2012] EWHC 735 (Ch), [2012] MHLO 28, Coombs v Dorset NHS PCT [2012] EWHC 521 (QB), [2012] MHLO 13. Also mentioned are: CQC report on DOLS; Listing Deprivation of Liberty Safeguarding cases; COP Cases Online and all previous newsletters in one PDF document. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (21): LPA case. {{pagesummary|Re Drew (2012) MHLO 45 (LPA)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (20): LPA case. {{pagesummary|Re Bloom (2012) MHLO 44 (LPA)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (19): LPA case. {{pagesummary|Re Batchelor (2012) MHLO 43 (LPA)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (18): CQC, 'CQC inspector dismissed for gross misconduct' (27/4/12). 'A CQC inspector has been dismissed for gross misconduct after an internal investigation revealed that the impartiality of their regulatory judgements had been seriously compromised. This came to light as a result of whistle-blowing information to the CQC. No additional detail can be provided as CQC has now referred this matter to the police.' See [[CQC]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (17): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v B (2012) EWCA Crim 770, (2012) MHLO 42}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (16): Immigration appeal with mental health aspect. {{pagesummary|R (HA (Nigeria)) v SSHD (2012) EWHC 979 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 41}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (15): Sentence appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Ahmed (2012) EWCA Crim 708, (2012) MHLO 40}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (14): Costs. {{pagesummary|R (Sutton) v Calderdale Council (2012) EWHC 637 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 39}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (13): Immigration appeal with mental health aspect. {{pagesummary|MM (Zimbabwe) v SSHD (2012) EWCA Civ 279, (2012) MHLO 38}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (12): Extradition case with mental health aspect. {{pagesummary|Republic of South Africa v Dewani (2012) EWHC 842 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 37}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (11): Southern Irish case. {{pagesummary|L v Clinical Director of St Patrick's University Hospital (2012) IEHC 15, (2012) MHLO 36}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (10): Southern Irish case from 2008. {{pagesummary|Han v President of the Circuit Court (2008) IEHC 160}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (9): HMCTS, 'T128: Options for your Tribunal Referral Hearing: Community Patients' (April 2012). This is the form which is sent to CTO patients inviting them to cancel their tribunal referral hearings. See [[Tribunal Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (8): New caselaw category. See [[:Category:Statutory will cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (7): Statutory will case. {{pagesummary|Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Barbara Rich of 5 Stone Buildings&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (6): Updated guidance. HMCTS, 'Room Specification Recommendations for Tribunal Hearings' (March 2012). See [[Mental Health Tribunal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (5): The LSC is consulting on their proposal to discontinue funding for the Specialist Support Service, as a result of conceding a judicial review of their decision to do so. The consultation runs until 11/5/12. The specialist support service for mental health is run by Scott Moncrieff Solicitors, and is available from Monday to Friday, 10am to 4pm, on 0844 800 3364. Related articles: Legal Aid Handbook Blog, 'LSC concede judicial review; specialist support reprieved' (1/3/12); Legal Aid Handbook Blog, 'Weekly round up' (1/4/12). See [[Consultations#Legal Services Commission]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (4): Sentence appeal case. {{pagesummary|R v Levey (2012) EWCA Crim 657, (2012) MHLO 34}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (3): Capacity/PI case. {{pagesummary|Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (2): Southern Irish case. {{pagesummary|Re JO'B; HSE v JO'B (2011) IEHC 73}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (1): Mind, 'Legal enewsletter' (Issue 11, April 2012). This newsletter contains: (1) Articles: (a) Making best interests decisions under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, (b) Listening to experience - Mind's report into acute and crisis mental healthcare, (c) The right to life under Article 2 of the ECHR, (d) The right to independent living - is it working?; (2) Case reports: (a) SSJ v RB (2011) EWCA Civ 1608, (b) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257, (c) O'Cathail v Transport for London (2012) EWCA Civ 92; (3) Updates: (a) Discrimination news, (b) Section 117 MHA 1983 and the Health and Social Care Bill 2012, (c) Changes to mental health tribunal rules and procedure, (d) Care Quality Commission, (e) Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CPID) Toolkit, (e) Proposed DVLA changes: fitness to drive, (f) Court of Protection. See [[Mind (Charity)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*26/04/12 (2): Turning Point, a health and social care charity, has an opportunity for a part-time Mental Health Act Administrator (22.5 hours) at a new 28-person Independent Hospital in Mastin Moor, Chesterfield. The closing date for applications is 10/5/12. See [https://turningpoint.ppsworks.co.uk/apply/index1.php?online_ref=31Dl34M6 Turning Point website] for details and to apply. See [[Jobs]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*26/04/12 (1): New COP Practice Direction. {{pagesummary|COP Practice Direction: Preparation of Bundles}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*25/04/12 (1): The Mental Health Lawyers Association will be running their successful two-day course for membership of the Law Society's Mental Health Accreditation Scheme (formerly the MHRT panel) in Leeds on Monday 18/6/12 and Tuesday 19/6/12. Price: £300 (members); £390 (non-members); £250 (for third and subsequent members in a group). CPD: 12 SRA-accredited hours. See MHLA website for further details and booking form. See [[Events]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*24/04/12 (2): {{pagesummary|Health and Social Care Act 2012}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*24/04/12 (1): {{pagesummary|Mental Health (Hospital, Guardianship and Treatment) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2012}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*19/04/12 (2): Please subscribe to Mental Health Law Online's new discussion list. This is separate from the email updates list, which remains unchanged. The discussion list will cover all aspects of mental health law in England and Wales, from the Mental Health Act 1983 and the Mental Health Tribunal, to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Court of Protection. See [[Discussion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*19/04/12 (1): Mental Health Law Online is six years old today! Many thanks to all readers, contributors and subscribers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*18/04/12 (2): Legal Action articles on the required content of social circumstances reports and responsible authority statements, reproduced by kind permission: (1) Christopher Curran, Malcolm Golightley and Phil Fennell, 'Social circumstances reports for mental health tribunals - Part 1' (Legal Action, June 2010); (2) Christopher Curran, Malcolm Golightley and Phil Fennell, 'Social circumstances reports for mental health tribunals - Part 1' (Legal Action, July 2010); (3) Christopher Curran, Phil Fennell and Simon Burrows, 'Responsible authority statements for mental health tribunals' (Legal Action, March 2012). See [[Tribunal Rules]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*18/04/12 (1): David Hewitt, 'Purpose alone can no longer determine if there is a deprivation of liberty' (Solicitors Journal, 16/4/12). This article argues that the reference in the Court of Appeal decision in Cheshire West to 'purpose' as being relevant to the objective element of deprivation of liberty is not supported by the subsequent ECtHR decision in Austin. See [[Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (4): New version. {{pagesummary|Guidance Booklet: Reports for Mental Health Tribunals}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (3): Mark Hinchliffe, 'Important Notice' (29/3/12). This document describes the changes made by the [[Tribunal Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2012]] on 6/4/12. In relation to the tribunal's requirement, in CTO reference cases, for evidence from the RC about the patient's capacity to decide not to attend or be represented, it states: 'We do not see that this should present a difficulty or a conflict of interest. The Responsible Clinician, as an expert witness, has no &amp;quot;interest&amp;quot; one way or the other and, in any event, has a responsibility to assess capacity in many situations...' See [[Mental Health Tribunal#Messages from Deputy Chamber President]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (2): New Practice Direction on reports. {{pagesummary|Practice Direction: First-tier Tribunal Health Education and Social Care Chamber: Statements and Reports in Mental Health Cases}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (1): LSC, 'New Keycard 48 to be introduced from 9 April' (5/4/12). Keycard 48 reflects an increase in the standard dependants' allowances assessed for a partner or child living within the client's household; the new rates are applicable to new applications or further assessments made on or after 9 April 2012. Eligibility limits are unchanged. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*06/04/12 (1): Case (detained patient paying for treatment): transcript and neutral citation now available. {{pagesummary|Coombs v Dorset NHS PCT (2012) EWHC 521 (QB), (2012) MHLO 13}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/04/12 (1): The following was asked on a discussion page on 2/4/12. 'Does anyone know: if a CTO inadvertently lapses (i.e. is not renewed by accident) does the original section 3 which the CTO was suspending come back into being? I know if you discharge someone from the CTO that discharges from the section 3. If you revoke the CTO then the Section 3 will come back into being. But if the CTO just lapses does that also mean that the Section 3 that was suspended has lapsed by default as well? I don't know the answer but if anyone does that would be really helpful. Thanks'. The answer is that when the CTO expires the s3 ceases to have effect: see [[s20B]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*01/04/12 (1): The government have announced that from 1 April 2012, following the Court of Appeal decision in [[Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257]] and the subsequent High Court decision in [[Re C; C v Blackburn and Darwen Borough Council (2011) EWHC 3321 (COP)]], the entire Mental Health Act 1983 will be repealed. The government spokesman, Avril Poisson, said: “Those subject to the Act lack capacity, as demonstrated by their inability to comply with voluntary inpatient treatment, and they should be treated equally to others who lack capacity. Recent case law on deprivation of liberty has shown that the relevant contrast when assessing ‘relative normality’ is not ‘the ordinary adult going about the kind of life which the able-bodied man or woman on the Clapham omnibus would normally expect to lead’ but rather ‘the kind of lives that people like X would normally expect to lead’ (Cheshire West, para 102). Periods of hospital inpatient treatment are normal, as an inevitable corollary of psychiatric disabilities: during those periods there are no realistic alternatives and no deprivation of liberty within the meaning of [[Article 5]] of the European Convention.” She said that the 29-year-old Act would be abolished with immediate effect because it is no longer fit for purpose, and that the “so-called” deprivation of liberty safeguards would also come under scrutiny. “When I use a word,” she said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” '''[Hope you enjoyed the April Fools' Day joke!]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*30/03/12 (1): The March 2012 CPD questionnaire is now online. Obtain 12 accredited CPD points for £60. See [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/cpd/ CPD scheme]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (6): CQC, 'The operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in England, 2010/11' (March 2012). Key findings: '(1) 8,982 applications to deprive a person of their liberty were processed, of which 50 per cent were authorised. (2) Many services have developed good practice on the use of the safeguards, especially in involving people and their families in the decision-making process, but some were confused as to when restraints or restrictions on a person amounted to a deprivation of liberty. (3) Between a third and a quarter of care homes had not provided their staff with training on the safeguards, and in some cases only the manager had received training. (4) Most hospitals had held some training, but the proportion of staff involved ranged between 20-100 per cent.' See also: CQC, 'Summary: The operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in England, 2010/11' (March 2012); Lucy Series, 'CQC's second monitoring report on the deprivation of liberty safeguards' (Small Places blog, 27/3/12). See [[CQC]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (5): LSC, 'Accreditation contribution scheme update' (28/3/12). From 2/4/12 the LSC will reduce the amount it contributes to the costs of mental health panel membership by 50% to £73.44; from 1/4/13 there will be no contribution at all. In recent weeks the Law Society's accreditation fees doubled to £500 plus VAT. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (4): Case transcript. {{pagesummary|A London Borough v VT (2011) EWHC 3806 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (3): Case transcript. {{pagesummary|EB v RC (2011) EWHC 3805 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (2): Neutral citation available. {{pagesummary|Re JDS; KGS v JDS (2012) EWHC 302 (COP), (2012) MHLO 4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (1): Case summary. {{pagesummary|DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/bullet_feed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update archive===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[March 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[February 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[January 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Updates|Previous updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Court_of_Protection</id>
		<title>Court of Protection</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Court_of_Protection"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T15:15:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: /* MOJ website */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The new Court of Protection was set up under the [[Mental Capacity Act 2005]]. It can make decisions on whether people have capacity in relation to particular decisions, make decisions on their behalf, appoint or remove people who make decisions on people's behalf, and make decisions relating to [[Lasting Powers of Attorney]] or [[Enduring Powers of Attorney]]. On 1/4/09 the COP administration transferred from the OPG to HMCS (now HMCTS).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==See also==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Court of Protection Rules 2007]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Court of Protection Practice Directions]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Court of Protection forms]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Office of the Public Guardian]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Mental Capacity Act 2005 (Transfer Of Proceedings) Order 2007]]&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Civil Procedure Rules 1998]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Listing Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards cases==&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:File:Listing Deprivation of Liberty Safeguarding cases 2012.pdf|Court of Protection, 'Listing Deprivation of Liberty Safeguarding cases' (15/3/12)]]. From 15/3/12, it is no longer necessary for DOLS cases to be heard by High Court judges. The full text is as follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{Text:Listing DOLS cases March 2012}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==External resources==&lt;br /&gt;
===MOJ website===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.justice.gov.uk/guidance/courts-and-tribunals/courts/court-of-protection/index.htm MOJ website: Court of Protection page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.justice.gov.uk/protecting-the-vulnerable/cfo/court-of-protection MOJ website: another Court of Protection page]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:File:COP-listing-policy.doc|HMCTS, 'Court of Protection: Listing Policy - information for court users' (September 2011)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Judiciary website===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:File:Court of Protection Report 2010.pdf|Judiciary of England and Wales, 'Court of Protection Report 2010' (July 2011)]]. The report contains the following chapters: (1) Judiciary; (2) Court administration; (3) Work of the court; (4) Review of performance; (5) Case law; and (6) Volume of business. The case law chapter summarises 28 decisions made during the year.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications_media/media_releases/2010/1810.htm Court of Protection: 2009 Report] - published 10/6/10 - This first report of the Court of Protection, covering the period from 1/10/07 to 31/12/09, describes the work undertaken by the court and summarises several reported decisions&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[:File:Family-courts-media-july2011.pdf|Wolanski and Wilson, 'The Family Courts: Media Access &amp;amp; Reporting' (July 2011)]]. This document (a joint publication of The President of the Family Division, the Judicial College and the Society of Editors) contains information on cases in the Court of Protection and under the High Court's inherent jurisdiction&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other links===&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed66566 Moira Sofaer, 'The Court of Protection - continuing complaints', Family Law Week, 27/9/10]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:COP checklists Article November 2010.pdf|Victoria Butler-Cole and Alex Ruck Keene, 'Preparing care plans, transition plans and best interests assessments for Court of Protection proceedings', 39 Essex Street, November 2009]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Family Law Week:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed78177 Sally Bradley, 'Court of Protection Update (January 2011)' (Family Law Week, 7/1/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed86737 Sally Bradley, 'Court of Protection Update (October 2011)' (Family Law Week, 2/10/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed95121 Sally Bradley, 'Court of Protection Update (January 2012)' (Family Law Week, 18/1/12)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/Governmentcitizensandrights/Mentalcapacityandthelaw/Makingdecisionsforsomeoneelse/DG_176235 Directgov, 'Making an application to the Court of Protection']&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://thesmallplaces.blogspot.com/2011/07/access-reporting-and-judgments-in-court.html Lucy Series, 'Access, reporting and judgments in the Court of Protection' (Small Places blog, 29/7/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2011/jul/30/court-funds-claimants-tax-inflation Jan Insley, 'Court Funds claimants losing out to effects of tax and inflation' (30/7/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Letter from COP court manager July 2011.pdf|Letter from COP Court Manager (July 2011)]] and associated [[Media:COP questionnaire July 2011.pdf|COP Questionnaire (July 2011)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/court-of-protection Guardian newspaper list of Court of Protection articles (automatically updated)]. Selected articles below:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/nov/06/court-of-protection-public-scrutiny Amelia Hill, 'Court of protection should be open to public scrutiny, says leading judge' (Guardian, 6/11/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/nov/06/court-protection-defender-vulnerable-unjust Amelia Hill, 'The court of protection: defender of the vulnerable or shadowy and unjust?' (Guardian, 6/11/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2011/nov/07/court-of-protection-family-rights Martin Terrell, 'Court of protection must balance needs of vulnerable with rights of family' (Guardian, 7/11/11)]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*[[:File:David Lock - best interests.pdf|David Lock, 'Best Interest decision-making in the Court of Protection' (No 5 Chambers, 28/2/12)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Related books==&lt;br /&gt;
{{book|copp}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{{book|coplr}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Mental Capacity Act 2005 provisions]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates</id>
		<title>Updates</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Updates"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T15:14:26Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;If you have anything which is not yet on the internet (e.g. court results or transcripts) then please send it in (see [[Help|Help page]]).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Keeping up to date==&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Email.jpg] You can now subscribe to free '''[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Email updates]''', on an occasional or monthly basis. &lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Discussion http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/Discussion.png] Join the new [[Discussion|email discussion list]]&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline http://twitter-badges.s3.amazonaws.com/t_mini-a.png] Receive updates as soon as they are added by following us on Twitter: [http://www.twitter.com/mhlonline @mhlonline]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/RSS.gif] Subscribe to the website's [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/index.php?title=Update&amp;amp;action=bullet_feed RSS update feed]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
*&amp;lt;span class=&amp;quot;plainlinks&amp;quot;&amp;gt;[http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/images/E-book_16x16.png] Receive monthly updates delivered automatically to your [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/lists/ Kindle e-reader]&amp;lt;/span&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Recent updates on website==&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;bullet_feed title=&amp;quot;Mental Health Law Online Update RSS&amp;quot; desc=&amp;quot;What's new on the site&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (15): LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12). The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (14): Steve Doughty, 'Father of two with motor neurone disease wins right to die by blinking his eye after judge's landmark ruling' (Daily Mail, 1/5/12). See [[Settled cases and forthcoming judgments#Re XB (advance decision, Theis J)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (13): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Parkins (2012) EWCA Crim 856, (2012) MHLO 50}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (12): PI quantum case. {{pagesummary|Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (11): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (10): PVS case. {{pagesummary|Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (9): Best interests case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (8): Capacity case. {{pagesummary|LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (7): OS's costs case. {{pagesummary|B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (6): Simon Edwards, 'Capacity and tenancies/licences' (39 Essex Street, 19/4/12). See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (5): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 21, May 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: B v B (2010) EWHC 543 (Fam) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 1) (2011) EWHC 3932 (COP) — LB Haringey v FG (No. 2) (2011) EWHC 3933 (COP) — Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33 — Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP) — Re D; An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 885 (COP), (2012) MHLO 47 — Re D (Official Solicitor's costs); An NHS Trust v D (2012) EWHC 886 (COP), (2012) MHLO 48 — Verlander v Rahman (2012) EWHC 1026 (QB), (2012) MHLO 49. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter#May 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (4): Rosalind English, 'Delay in transferring mental health patient for treatment amounted to &amp;quot;inhumane treatment&amp;quot;' (3/5/12). This article concludes: 'This is a prime example of using Article 3 as a social and economic right, not a basic civil right, and thus extended leaves publicly funded authorities to carry out difficult jobs with threats of litigation looming on all sides. The UK courts recognised this claim for what it was, and dismissed it. Strasbourg should have done the same.' See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (3): Mental Health Cop Blog, 'MS v UK' (4/5/12). This article is in favour of the judgment and makes points in relation to (1) place of safety arguments, (2) accessing psychiatric beds, (3) media coverage, and (4) implications. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (2): ECtHR, 'Prolonged police detention of mentally-ill man without adequate medical care violated his Convention rights' (Press release ref ECHR 195 (2012), 3/5/12). This is the court's summary of the judgment. See [[MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12 (1): Article 3 case. {{pagesummary|MS v UK 24527/08 (2012) ECHR 804, (2012) MHLO 46}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (25): Westminster Hall debate on Litigation Friends (HC Deb, 21 March 2012, c244WH). See [[Official Solicitor]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (24): Irwin Mitchell Solicitors, 'Mother Proved Right As Son Freed From Padded Room Hell Makes Progress' (29/3/12). 'Court Anonymity Order Lifted Naming Wigan Borough Council As Local Authority Which Locked Up Her Autistic Son.' See [[Re C; C v Wigan Borough Council (2011) EWHC 1539 (Admin)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (23): HMCTS, 'Mental Health Tribunal Stakeholder Bulletin April 2012' (17/4/12). The following are the headings: Contacting the Tribunal; Reports Processing Team; Section 2 Cases; Scanned Reports; Password protection; Notification to the Tribunal of Patient Withdrawals and RC Discharges; HQ2 Questionnaire; FTT Mental Health Policy update; Clerking; Facilities for the Hearing impaired; Olympics and Paralympics 2012 and the potential impact; Relist Team; Customer Survey; Feedback. In relation to the new forms: '''Form CNL2''' ('Case Notification Letter 2'), which from May 2012 will be sent to the representative with the RC's report, demands that the representative complete '''Form HQ2''' ('Hearing Questionnaire 2'). HQ2 asks the following questions: (1) What is the Patient seeking from the tribunal, and what are the principal areas of dispute? (2) Do you intend to call an independent expert? If so, please give details. (3) What is your hearing time estimate? (4) Would this case benefit from pre-hearing review by a tribunal judge? If so, please say why (e.g. change of status under the Act, or recent hospital transfer). (5) Are there any other matters that you feel that the panel should know in order to dispose of this matter justly, fairly and without delay? (6) Does the patient need an interpreter? If so, please give details of language and dialect. See [[Mental Health Tribunal#Tribunal member and stakeholder email bulletin]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (22): 39 Essex Street, 'Court of Protection Newsletter' (issue 20, April 2012). The cases mentioned in this issue are: Austin v UK 39692/09 [2012] ECHR 459, [2012] MHLO 22, DD v Lithuania 13469/06 [2012] ECHR 254, [2012] MHLO 29, DL v A Local Authority [2012] EWCA Civ 253, [2012] MHLO 32, Long v Rodman [2012] EWHC 347 (Ch), [2012] MHLO 12, ZH v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2012] EWHC 604 (QB), [2012] MHLO 25, Seaton v Seddon [2012] EWHC 735 (Ch), [2012] MHLO 28, Coombs v Dorset NHS PCT [2012] EWHC 521 (QB), [2012] MHLO 13. Also mentioned are: CQC report on DOLS; Listing Deprivation of Liberty Safeguarding cases; COP Cases Online and all previous newsletters in one PDF document. See [[39 Essex Street COP Newsletter]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (21): LPA case. {{pagesummary|Re Drew (2012) MHLO 45 (LPA)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (20): LPA case. {{pagesummary|Re Bloom (2012) MHLO 44 (LPA)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (19): LPA case. {{pagesummary|Re Batchelor (2012) MHLO 43 (LPA)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (18): CQC, 'CQC inspector dismissed for gross misconduct' (27/4/12). 'A CQC inspector has been dismissed for gross misconduct after an internal investigation revealed that the impartiality of their regulatory judgements had been seriously compromised. This came to light as a result of whistle-blowing information to the CQC. No additional detail can be provided as CQC has now referred this matter to the police.' See [[CQC]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (17): Criminal appeal. {{pagesummary|R v B (2012) EWCA Crim 770, (2012) MHLO 42}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (16): Immigration appeal with mental health aspect. {{pagesummary|R (HA (Nigeria)) v SSHD (2012) EWHC 979 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 41}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (15): Sentence appeal. {{pagesummary|R v Ahmed (2012) EWCA Crim 708, (2012) MHLO 40}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (14): Costs. {{pagesummary|R (Sutton) v Calderdale Council (2012) EWHC 637 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 39}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (13): Immigration appeal with mental health aspect. {{pagesummary|MM (Zimbabwe) v SSHD (2012) EWCA Civ 279, (2012) MHLO 38}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (12): Extradition case with mental health aspect. {{pagesummary|Republic of South Africa v Dewani (2012) EWHC 842 (Admin), (2012) MHLO 37}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (11): Southern Irish case. {{pagesummary|L v Clinical Director of St Patrick's University Hospital (2012) IEHC 15, (2012) MHLO 36}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (10): Southern Irish case from 2008. {{pagesummary|Han v President of the Circuit Court (2008) IEHC 160}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (9): HMCTS, 'T128: Options for your Tribunal Referral Hearing: Community Patients' (April 2012). This is the form which is sent to CTO patients inviting them to cancel their tribunal referral hearings. See [[Tribunal Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2012]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (8): New caselaw category. See [[:Category:Statutory will cases]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (7): Statutory will case. {{pagesummary|Re JC; D v JC (2012) MHLO 35 (COP)}} Transcript provided by Barbara Rich of 5 Stone Buildings&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (6): Updated guidance. HMCTS, 'Room Specification Recommendations for Tribunal Hearings' (March 2012). See [[Mental Health Tribunal]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (5): The LSC is consulting on their proposal to discontinue funding for the Specialist Support Service, as a result of conceding a judicial review of their decision to do so. The consultation runs until 11/5/12. The specialist support service for mental health is run by Scott Moncrieff Solicitors, and is available from Monday to Friday, 10am to 4pm, on 0844 800 3364. Related articles: Legal Aid Handbook Blog, 'LSC concede judicial review; specialist support reprieved' (1/3/12); Legal Aid Handbook Blog, 'Weekly round up' (1/4/12). See [[Consultations#Legal Services Commission]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (4): Sentence appeal case. {{pagesummary|R v Levey (2012) EWCA Crim 657, (2012) MHLO 34}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (3): Capacity/PI case. {{pagesummary|Dunhill v Burgin (2012) EWCA Civ 397, (2012) MHLO 33}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (2): Southern Irish case. {{pagesummary|Re JO'B; HSE v JO'B (2011) IEHC 73}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/04/12 (1): Mind, 'Legal enewsletter' (Issue 11, April 2012). This newsletter contains: (1) Articles: (a) Making best interests decisions under the Mental Capacity Act 2005, (b) Listening to experience - Mind's report into acute and crisis mental healthcare, (c) The right to life under Article 2 of the ECHR, (d) The right to independent living - is it working?; (2) Case reports: (a) SSJ v RB (2011) EWCA Civ 1608, (b) Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257, (c) O'Cathail v Transport for London (2012) EWCA Civ 92; (3) Updates: (a) Discrimination news, (b) Section 117 MHA 1983 and the Health and Social Care Bill 2012, (c) Changes to mental health tribunal rules and procedure, (d) Care Quality Commission, (e) Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CPID) Toolkit, (e) Proposed DVLA changes: fitness to drive, (f) Court of Protection. See [[Mind (Charity)]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*26/04/12 (2): Turning Point, a health and social care charity, has an opportunity for a part-time Mental Health Act Administrator (22.5 hours) at a new 28-person Independent Hospital in Mastin Moor, Chesterfield. The closing date for applications is 10/5/12. See [https://turningpoint.ppsworks.co.uk/apply/index1.php?online_ref=31Dl34M6 Turning Point website] for details and to apply. See [[Jobs]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*26/04/12 (1): New COP Practice Direction. {{pagesummary|COP Practice Direction: Preparation of Bundles}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*25/04/12 (1): The Mental Health Lawyers Association will be running their successful two-day course for membership of the Law Society's Mental Health Accreditation Scheme (formerly the MHRT panel) in Leeds on Monday 18/6/12 and Tuesday 19/6/12. Price: £300 (members); £390 (non-members); £250 (for third and subsequent members in a group). CPD: 12 SRA-accredited hours. See MHLA website for further details and booking form. See [[Events]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*24/04/12 (2): {{pagesummary|Health and Social Care Act 2012}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*24/04/12 (1): {{pagesummary|Mental Health (Hospital, Guardianship and Treatment) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2012}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*19/04/12 (2): Please subscribe to Mental Health Law Online's new discussion list. This is separate from the email updates list, which remains unchanged. The discussion list will cover all aspects of mental health law in England and Wales, from the Mental Health Act 1983 and the Mental Health Tribunal, to the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and the Court of Protection. See [[Discussion]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*19/04/12 (1): Mental Health Law Online is six years old today! Many thanks to all readers, contributors and subscribers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*18/04/12 (2): Legal Action articles on the required content of social circumstances reports and responsible authority statements, reproduced by kind permission: (1) Christopher Curran, Malcolm Golightley and Phil Fennell, 'Social circumstances reports for mental health tribunals - Part 1' (Legal Action, June 2010); (2) Christopher Curran, Malcolm Golightley and Phil Fennell, 'Social circumstances reports for mental health tribunals - Part 1' (Legal Action, July 2010); (3) Christopher Curran, Phil Fennell and Simon Burrows, 'Responsible authority statements for mental health tribunals' (Legal Action, March 2012). See [[Tribunal Rules]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*18/04/12 (1): David Hewitt, 'Purpose alone can no longer determine if there is a deprivation of liberty' (Solicitors Journal, 16/4/12). This article argues that the reference in the Court of Appeal decision in Cheshire West to 'purpose' as being relevant to the objective element of deprivation of liberty is not supported by the subsequent ECtHR decision in Austin. See [[Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (4): New version. {{pagesummary|Guidance Booklet: Reports for Mental Health Tribunals}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (3): Mark Hinchliffe, 'Important Notice' (29/3/12). This document describes the changes made by the [[Tribunal Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2012]] on 6/4/12. In relation to the tribunal's requirement, in CTO reference cases, for evidence from the RC about the patient's capacity to decide not to attend or be represented, it states: 'We do not see that this should present a difficulty or a conflict of interest. The Responsible Clinician, as an expert witness, has no &amp;quot;interest&amp;quot; one way or the other and, in any event, has a responsibility to assess capacity in many situations...' See [[Mental Health Tribunal#Messages from Deputy Chamber President]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (2): New Practice Direction on reports. {{pagesummary|Practice Direction: First-tier Tribunal Health Education and Social Care Chamber: Statements and Reports in Mental Health Cases}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12 (1): LSC, 'New Keycard 48 to be introduced from 9 April' (5/4/12). Keycard 48 reflects an increase in the standard dependants' allowances assessed for a partner or child living within the client's household; the new rates are applicable to new applications or further assessments made on or after 9 April 2012. Eligibility limits are unchanged. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*06/04/12 (1): Case (detained patient paying for treatment): transcript and neutral citation now available. {{pagesummary|Coombs v Dorset NHS PCT (2012) EWHC 521 (QB), (2012) MHLO 13}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/04/12 (1): The following was asked on a discussion page on 2/4/12. 'Does anyone know: if a CTO inadvertently lapses (i.e. is not renewed by accident) does the original section 3 which the CTO was suspending come back into being? I know if you discharge someone from the CTO that discharges from the section 3. If you revoke the CTO then the Section 3 will come back into being. But if the CTO just lapses does that also mean that the Section 3 that was suspended has lapsed by default as well? I don't know the answer but if anyone does that would be really helpful. Thanks'. The answer is that when the CTO expires the s3 ceases to have effect: see [[s20B]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*01/04/12 (1): The government have announced that from 1 April 2012, following the Court of Appeal decision in [[Cheshire West and Chester Council v P (2011) EWCA Civ 1257]] and the subsequent High Court decision in [[Re C; C v Blackburn and Darwen Borough Council (2011) EWHC 3321 (COP)]], the entire Mental Health Act 1983 will be repealed. The government spokesman, Avril Poisson, said: “Those subject to the Act lack capacity, as demonstrated by their inability to comply with voluntary inpatient treatment, and they should be treated equally to others who lack capacity. Recent case law on deprivation of liberty has shown that the relevant contrast when assessing ‘relative normality’ is not ‘the ordinary adult going about the kind of life which the able-bodied man or woman on the Clapham omnibus would normally expect to lead’ but rather ‘the kind of lives that people like X would normally expect to lead’ (Cheshire West, para 102). Periods of hospital inpatient treatment are normal, as an inevitable corollary of psychiatric disabilities: during those periods there are no realistic alternatives and no deprivation of liberty within the meaning of [[Article 5]] of the European Convention.” She said that the 29-year-old Act would be abolished with immediate effect because it is no longer fit for purpose, and that the “so-called” deprivation of liberty safeguards would also come under scrutiny. “When I use a word,” she said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.” '''[Hope you enjoyed the April Fools' Day joke!]'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*30/03/12 (1): The March 2012 CPD questionnaire is now online. Obtain 12 accredited CPD points for £60. See [http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/cpd/ CPD scheme]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (6): CQC, 'The operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in England, 2010/11' (March 2012). Key findings: '(1) 8,982 applications to deprive a person of their liberty were processed, of which 50 per cent were authorised. (2) Many services have developed good practice on the use of the safeguards, especially in involving people and their families in the decision-making process, but some were confused as to when restraints or restrictions on a person amounted to a deprivation of liberty. (3) Between a third and a quarter of care homes had not provided their staff with training on the safeguards, and in some cases only the manager had received training. (4) Most hospitals had held some training, but the proportion of staff involved ranged between 20-100 per cent.' See also: CQC, 'Summary: The operation of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards in England, 2010/11' (March 2012); Lucy Series, 'CQC's second monitoring report on the deprivation of liberty safeguards' (Small Places blog, 27/3/12). See [[CQC]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (5): LSC, 'Accreditation contribution scheme update' (28/3/12). From 2/4/12 the LSC will reduce the amount it contributes to the costs of mental health panel membership by 50% to £73.44; from 1/4/13 there will be no contribution at all. In recent weeks the Law Society's accreditation fees doubled to £500 plus VAT. See [[Legal Aid News]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (4): Case transcript. {{pagesummary|A London Borough v VT (2011) EWHC 3806 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (3): Case transcript. {{pagesummary|EB v RC (2011) EWHC 3805 (COP)}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (2): Neutral citation available. {{pagesummary|Re JDS; KGS v JDS (2012) EWHC 302 (COP), (2012) MHLO 4}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12 (1): Case summary. {{pagesummary|DL v A Local Authority (2012) EWCA Civ 253, (2012) MHLO 32}}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/bullet_feed&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Update archive===&lt;br /&gt;
*[[March 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[February 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[January 2012 update]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [[:Category:Updates|Previous updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Updates]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Contents]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Legal_Aid_News</id>
		<title>Legal Aid News</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.mentalhealthlaw.co.uk/Legal_Aid_News"/>
				<updated>2012-05-05T15:13:22Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Jonathan: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Some of the sources for the following news items are listed below - check them for updates not listed on this site.&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news.asp CLS News]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/tendering/mental_health.asp Mental health tendering pages]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/tendering/civil_contracts_for_2010.asp Civil contracts for 2010]&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/8758.asp 2010 Standard Civil Contract]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For further details, see [[Legal Aid]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
News items:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/05/12: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_13713.asp?page=1 LSC, 'Legal Aid Bill gets Royal Assent' (1/5/12)]. The [[Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012]] is due to amend the scope, eligibility and other aspects of the legal aid scheme on 1/4/13. In order to implement the changes, the Legal Services Commission will tender for new contracts for face-to-face advice and/or telephone advice in certain areas of law (not mental health or community care). The Commission will be replaced by the Legal Aid Agency, which will be an Executive Agency of the Ministry of Justice. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/04/12: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_13658.asp?page=1 LSC, 'New Keycard 48 to be introduced from 9 April' (5/4/12)]. [[:File:LSC Keycard 48.pdf|Keycard 48]] reflects an increase in the standard dependants' allowances assessed for a partner or child living within the client's household; the new rates are applicable to new applications or further assessments made on or after 9 April 2012. Eligibility limits are unchanged.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*28/03/12: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_13631.asp?page=1 LSC, 'Accreditation contribution scheme update' (28/3/12)]. From 2/4/12 the LSC will reduce the amount it contributes to the costs of mental health panel membership by 50% to £73.44; from 1/4/13 there will be no contribution at all. In recent weeks the Law Society's accreditation fees doubled to £500 plus VAT. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/03/12: [[:File:LSC-Headline-approach-to-future-tenders Feb2012.pdf|LSC, 'Headline intentions for future tenders' (February 2012)]]. The main points are: (1) To implement scope changes in April 2013, the LSC plans to tender for face-to-face contracts over the next year in the following areas: Family; Asylum (including residual non-asylum work); Housing and Debt; Housing Possession Court Duty Schemes. (2) Existing contracts will amended, not terminated, in the following areas: Community Care; Mental Health; Actions Against the Police; Public Law. (3) Contracts for categories being removed from scope will be terminated. (4) Crime contracts will not be re-tendered before 2015. (5) A tender exercise for mediation work will be carried out to increase provision. (6) The telephone gateway (operator service and specialist telephone advice) plans, which are set out in detail, apply to community care but not mental health. (7) All supervisors in Public Law Children work may have to be Children Panel members, but there are no other changes to accreditation planned. (8) All providers must hold either SQM or Lexcel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/03/12: [[:File:LSC Liverpool Law Society speech Feb 2012.pdf|Sir Bill Callaghan, LSC Chairman, 'The Future of Legal Aid' (Speech to Liverpool Law Society, 8/2/12)]]. This speech suggested that the matter-start system will be abolished in the next contract: 'The ongoing administration of new matter start allocations is now attracting particular attention because it takes a great deal of effort for both providers and LSC staff. The removal of a fixed allocation of new matter starts is one idea that has been put to us by representative bodies. Fixed allocations mean that more popular providers often run out of work and are refused an increase while other providers in the area have unused matter starts. A more open competition at client level would be one way of dealing with this issue and we think it should improve the quality of provision and client care. What we’re talking about here is licensing civil contract work rather than simply allocating a fixed number of new matter starts. There is still a lot discussion to be had about the detail of how this will work. But we envisage introducing this approach in April 2013 at the same time as the LSC is abolished and the new Executive Agency takes over.'&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/03/12: [http://legalaidhandbook.com/2012/03/01/lsc-concede-judicial-review/ Legal Aid Handbook, 'LSC concede judicial review; specialist support reprieved' (1/3/12)]. The LSC conceded a JR claim brought by the Public Law Project of the decision, made without consultation, to abolish the specialist support service. Instead of the contracts expiring in March 2012 they will be extended until 30/6/12 pending a consultation process. The mental health specialist support service, run by Scott Moncrieff Solicitors, can be called on 0844 800 3364 from Monday to Friday 10am to 4pm.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*05/01/12: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/forms/civilformspreviewfeb12.asp LSC, 'Civil forms preview - February 2012' (5/1/12)]. A new CW1&amp;amp;2(MH) form becomes mandatory on 1/2/12. Other changed civil/family forms are : CW1, CW2(IMM), CLSMEANS1 &amp;amp; CK3, CLSAPP3, CLSAPP5, CLSAPP8, CLSAPP8A, CLSCLAIM1A Guidance &amp;amp; CLSCLAIM5A Guidance. Old versions signed and dated on or before 1/2/12 will be accepted until 29/2/12.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*31/12/11: [[:File:Civil Cost Limit Changes 12 Dec 2011.pdf|LSC, 'Revised cost limitations on civil legal aid certificates' (12/12/11)]]. These changes have been made as a result of the 10% fee reduction.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*20/11/11: Hansard HL Deb, 26 October 2011, col 831. This is the transcript of a debate in the House of Lords on a motion to annul the Community Legal Service (Funding) (Amendment No.2) Order 2011 (the order which reduces civil fee rates by 10%); following the debate the motion was withdrawn. See [[Community Legal Service (Funding) (Amendment No.2) Order 2011]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*10/11/11: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_13208.asp LSC, 'New prior authority form to instruct civil legal aid experts' (CLS News, 9/11/11)]. New form APP8A introduced, together with guidance document.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*29/09/11: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/forms/oct_civil_forms_preview.asp October civil forms preview]. From 3/10/11 the following forms change (not all are directly related to mental health law): Means1; Means1 'The guide' and CLSCK3; Means7; CLAIM1, 1A, 2, 5, 5A; CLAIM1 &amp;amp; CLAIM2 checklists; CW1; ECClaim 1 (IMM) and (MH); TFF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*27/07/11: [[:File:LSC Statement on Devolved Powers 31 Jul 2011.pdf|Legal Services Commission, 'Devolved powers in judicial review cases under the 2010 contract' (dated 31/7/11, published 27/7/11)]]. The interim position has been extended to 31/1/12: devolved powers in JR cases may be exercised if a provider (a) has a contract in public law or the relevant category of law and (b) had such devolved powers under the previous contract.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*27/07/11: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_12872.asp LSC, 'CLS News: Emergency certificates now run for eight weeks – but check eligibility evidence and scope' (21/7/11)]. Emergency certificates granted from 1/5/11 will remain in force for eight weeks&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*23/07/11: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_12858.asp?page=1 LSC, 'CLS News: Mental health legal services: your views on equality impact assessment' (21/7/11)]. This is a reminder that the deadline for submitting views on the options for next steps following the equality impact assessment on the high secure hospital contracts is 29/7/11. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*20/7/11: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_12802.asp?page=1 LSC, 'CLS News: Mental health legal services: equality impact assessment published' (4/7/11)], relating to [[:File:Equality Impact Assessment of High Security Hospitals v1.0 010711.pdf|LSC, 'Equality Impact Assessment of exclusive mental health legal services contracts in High Security Hospitals' (4/7/11)]]. The LSC have concluded that there is no need for immediate change but have set out possible options for the future: (1) no change (the recommended option); (2) Exceptional circumstances to allow clients to retain their provider; (3) Individual arrangements at each hospital; (4) Wider choice of provider (e.g. 10) at each hospital through additional tender or extending number of 2010 contracts; (5) Wider choice of provider (e.g. 10) at each hospital through additional tender or extending number of 2010 contracts. Views on the decision and options are sought by 29/7/11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*22/06/11: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_12792.asp?page=1 CLS News, 'Legal aid reform: consultation response and Bill published' (21/6/11)]. This news item contains links to the consultation response and the [[Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill 2011]], and notes that the Bill, in addition to reducing scope, eligibility and fees, will close the LSC and replace it with an executive agency of the MOJ.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*22/06/11: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/legal_aid_reform.asp LSC, 'Summary of changes to be implemented on 3 Oct 2011' (21/6/11)]. The 10% reduction, and other fee changes, will be implemented on 3/10/11. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*12/06/11: Between May 2010 and May 2011, the LSC spent £7,196,813 on redundancies: a total of 94 people have so far been made redundant. The figures do not include those who left through other means, such as early retirement, the end of a secondment from another organisation, mutual terminations or compromise agreements. See [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/access_to_information/FOI_5291_FINAL_Redacted_for_publication.pdf LSC, 'Re Your Freedom of Information (FOI) Act request' (letter, 2/6/11)].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*09/04/11: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/forms/preview_may_2011.asp LSC, 'Forms preview May 2011' (8/4/11)]. The following will change: CLASAPP3, CLSPP5, CLSCLAIM1, CLSCLAIM1A, CLSCLAIM1A Guidance, CLSCLAIM2, CLSCLAIM5A, CLSCLAIM5A Guidance, CW1 Public Law. They are mandatory from 9/5/11 and must not be used before then. Old forms (signed before 9/5/11) will be accepted until 3/6/11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*09/04/11: [[:File:LSC Keycard 47.pdf|Legal Services Commission, 'Community Legal Services: Keycard No 47' (April 2011)]]. This document is helpful if working out financial eligibility for Legal Help. The changes in this edition are that: (1) references to LSC Manual 2F are changed to 2E; (2) dependents' allowances are increased. In force 11/4/11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*30/03/11: On 28/3/11, the [[Media:LSC s49A letter 28-3-11.pdf|LSC emailed mental health firms]] with [[Media:LSC s49A questionnaire March 2011.rtf|a questionnaire]] to comply with the judgment in [[Public Interest Lawyers v LSC (2010) EWHC 3277 (Admin)]]. The questions are worded in the hope of avoiding having to make any changes; nonetheless, responses are encouraged and should be emailed to the LSC by 8/4/11. The LSC will then publish a disability impact assessment by 30/4/11. At the same time it will publish the mitigating steps it plans to make (if any), consult on them until 15/6/11, and implement them on 1/7/11.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*30/03/11: [[:File:Justice_Committee_report_on_Legal_Aid_March_2011.pdf|House of Commons Justice Committee, 'Government's proposed reform of legal aid' (Third Report of Session 2010–11, Volume I, dated 29/3/11, published 30/3/11)]]. This document, among other things, contains interesting information about volume of work and expenditure on mental health Legal Aid over the last six years (Tables 1 and 4, and para 21).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*26/03/11: [[:File:OS response to Legal Aid Consultation Feb 2011.doc|Official Solicitor, 'Proposals for the reform of Legal Aid in England and Wales: Ministry of Justice consultation paper CP 12/10: Response of the Official Solicitor to the Senior Courts' (10/2/11)]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*26/03/11: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_12473.asp?page=1 LSC, 'Bank statements needed for funding applications' (CLS News, 3/2/11)]. All MEANS1 forms dated on or after 15/12/10 must be accompanied by bank statements covering the last three months for each account held by the client or his partner. From 14/3/11 the LSC will reject all non-emergency applications in breach of this requirement.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*25/03/11: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_12576.asp?page=1 LSC, 'Community Legal Advice and LSC websites – latest news' (CLS News, 23/3/11)]. The CLA (Community Legal Advice) and LSRC (Legal Services Research Centre, the independent research division of the LSC) websites will be closed and their content moved to the justice.gov.uk and direct.gov.uk websites on 6/4/11. The LSC website will be incorporated into the justice.gov.uk website later in 2011.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*23/03/11: The Law Society published a news item entitled [http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/newsandevents/news/view=newsarticle.law?NEWSID=435191 'Society criticises mental health consultation delays'] today. Because of the LSC's plan to dilly-dally over the disability impact assessment and consultation on contract changes following [[Public Interest Lawyers v LSC (2010) EWHC 3277 (Admin)]], 'clients will be forced into the very situation that the impact assessment is meant to be considering and potentially preventing'; if the provisions for urgent amendments were used then changes could be implemented by early April instead of the end of June as planned.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*23/03/11: On 20/2/11 the LSC published an [[:File:LSC SHA provider list.pdf|updated tender outcome document for the SHA procurement areas]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*24/02/11: On 24/2/11 the LSC published a [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/forms/preview_oct_2010.asp 'forms preview'] for the April 2011 changes to their forms. There are very minor changes to Checklist (CK3), and changes to the following forms which do not relate to mental health law: CW2 (IMM), CW3A, CW3B, CW3C. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*07/01/11: 0n 22/12/10 the LSC published revised Key Performance Indicators which are enforceable under the 2010 Civil Contract. The three KPI aims are (1) quality, (2) access, and (3) cost. The following KPIs apply to mental health: KPI 2A: 'Assessment reductions to be no more than 10% (exceptional cases)', KPI 2B: 'Assessment reductions to be no more than 15% (licensed work)', KPI 2D: 'Fixed Fee Margin 20%', KPI 3: 'NMS usage - providers must use either the minimum contract allocation or at least 85% of their current allocation' (whichever is the greater). The following KPIs do not apply to mental health: KPI 1A: 'Substantive Benefit: Legal Help', KPI 1B: 'Substantive Benefit: CLR and Licensed Work', KPI 1C: 'Post-investigation of proceedings', KPI 1D: 'ADR to be proposed/accepted in no less than 10% of a providers civil representation cases where appropriate', KPI 2C: 'Damages vs. Costs: Damages to be 2:1 the level of costs (net of any costs recovered)'. See the [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_12320.asp?page=1 CLS news item], the [[:File:Civil KPIs revised December 2010.pdf|guidance document]] and the [[:File:Civil Provider KPIs 2010 - KPIs Applicable by Category v4.pdf|summary chart]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*19/12/10: On 17/12/10 the LSC published details of the outcomes of each of the main civil tender processes, including for the mental health [[:File:LSC SHA provider list.pdf|SHA tender]] and [[:File:LSC HSH provider list.pdf|HSH tender]]. These documents list each firm and the number of matter starts awarded to them, sorted by procurement area; the lists may change as contract validation is still ongoing and some contracts are yet to be issued. The five firms for Ashworth are: Peter Edwards Law (125 matter starts), Duncan Lewis &amp;amp; Co (108), Jackson &amp;amp; Canter LLP (30), RMNJ Solicitors (30), Swain &amp;amp; Co (30). The five firms for Broadmoor are: Scott-Moncrieff, Harbour &amp;amp; Sinclair (120), Blavo &amp;amp; Co (94), Burke Niazi Solicitors (40), Gledhill Solicitors (30), Wolton and Co (30). The six firms for Rampton are: Scott-Moncrieff, Harbour &amp;amp; Sinclair (110), Cartwright King (96), Switalskis (75), Burke Niazi Solicitors (40), Donovan Newton Solicitors (30), Peter Edwards Law (30). Using totals across SHA procurement areas, the largest firms in the SHA tender are: Duncan Lewis &amp;amp; Co (3262), Blavo &amp;amp; Co Solicitors (2910), CMHT Solicitors (1305), Cartwright King (1155), Switalskis (860), Peters &amp;amp; Co (804), Guile Nicholas (759), Dozie &amp;amp; Co (732), Peter Edwards Law Ltd (710), Andrew Markham &amp;amp; Co (702), Scott-Moncrieff Harbour &amp;amp; Sinclair (653), Burke Niazi Solicitors (606), Thaliwal Bridge (581), Corper Solicitors (519), RMNJ Solicitors (506). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*16/12/10: [[:File:LSC civil tenders update Dec 2010.pdf|LSC, 'Civil Tenders Update', 13/12/10]]. In relation to the mental health JR it is stated that 'In the Public Interest Lawyers case, a wide range of challenges were made relating to the Mental Health and Public Law tenders. The majority of grounds of challenge were abandoned before the final hearing and others apart from one were rejected by the court.' This is misleading: the LSC lost both on verification and the general disability equality duty. Apparently most of the remaining challenges arising out of the 2010 tender process relate to individual tender or appeal decisions and are therefore unlikely to affect other contracts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*09/12/10: LSC news item [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_12226.asp?page=1 'Civil legal aid, bank statements and wage slips'] published on 7/12/10. A reminder that in some circumstances, bank statements and wage slips are required for Legal Representation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*03/12/10: The LSC published their [[:File:LSC Annual Report 2009-10.pdf|Annual Report and Accounts for 2009-10]] on 30/11/10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*24/11/10: CLS News item 23/11/10: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_12207.asp?page=1 New LSC forms mandatory from 15 November] - A reminder that new versions of the following must be used: CLS APP1, CLS APP6, CLSAPP7, CLS APP8, CLS MEANS 1, 1A, 1B, 1C, CLS MEANS 2, CLS MEANS 3, CLS MEANS 4, CLS MEANS 5, Means Guidance &amp;amp; Checklist (CK3), CLS POA1, CW1, CW1&amp;amp;2 (MH), CW2 (IMM), CW Counsel (MH), CW3A, 3B &amp;amp; 3C, Civil Codes Guidance &amp;amp; Guidance for Reporting Controlled Work; some crime forms have also changed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*24/11/10: Legal Aid was mentioned in Parliament on 7/9/10 in response to the [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm100907/text/100907w0005.htm written question]: 'To ask the Secretary of State for Justice what assessment his Department has made of the adequacy of the level of funding for legal aid for cases relating to mental health legislation compared to that for other legal sectors.' The minister replied that Legal Aid for MHT work is not means-tested, that in order to ensure that demand is met 1,500 more new matter starts will be allocated for 2010-11 than in 2009-10, that the mental health contract tenders were carried out on a non-competitive basis, and that the number of applicants who have been provisionally offered a contract closely matches the number of existing providers. He ignored the high secure tender which was competitive, and which reduced the number of suppliers from 98 to 9 (source: presentation at MHLA conference, 19/11/10). In the general tender there were 288 successful applicants, including 68 new entrants (34 of which are in London) (source: [[:File:LSC 100617 Statement on MH Awards FINALv2.0.pdf|LSC, 'Statement on Mental Health Awards', 17/6/10]]; ''figures corrected 29/11/10''). A broadly similar answer was given to a [http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm101028/text/101028w0004.htm written question] on 28/10/10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*22/11/10: On 21/10/10 version 8 of [[:File:LSC RMManual FinalDraftCopy version8.pdf|'RM Assurance Process: Guidance for RM Visits']] was published. See August news item below for information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*17/11/10: On 15/11/10 the LSC published '[[:File:Devolved Powers in Judicial Review cases under the 2010 Contract.pdf|Devolved Powers in Judicial Review cases under the 2010 Contract]]'. Mental health firms who had 2007 contracts can continue to exercise devolved powers for mental health judicial reviews, but from 1/4/11 this will only be possible if the power has specifically been granted. The LSC will be consulting on criteria for awarding the power to exercise devolved powers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*13/11/10: On 12/11/10 the LSC published [[:File:LSC Forms Version List October 2010.pdf|Forms Version List October 2010]] (including forms for 15/11/10 onwards).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*11/11/10: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_12142.asp?page=1 CLS News: Financial eligibility - changes to evidence rules from 15 November] - 11/11/10 - Wage slips and bank statements must accompany form CLS MEANS1 where appropriate&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*11/11/10: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_12144.asp?page=1 CLS News: 2010 Standard Civil Contract documentation now sent out] - 11/11/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*11/11/10: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_12138.asp?page=1 CLS News: New home for LSC websites] - 10/11/10 - All information on Legal Aid websites will be moved to either the MoJ or Directgov website by March 2011  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*11/11/10: [http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/new-high-court-challenge-legal-aid-contracts-fails Catherine Baksi, 'New legal aid court challenge set to proceed', Law Society Gazette 8/11/10] - The claimants, who challenged the selection criteria for the high-secure-hospital contract and the verification process for both contracts, failed to obtain injunction delaying implementation of mental health contracts but obtained protective costs order set at £100,000.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*11/11/10: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/101104_Guidance_on_Completing_Supervisor_Self_Declaration_Forms_v4.pdf Guidance on Completing Civil Supervisor Self Declaration Forms] - filename dated 4/11/10, document dated 5/11/10, published 8/11/10, marked version 4&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*11/11/10: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/forms/Where_Work_Is_Processed_Nov10.pdf Where work is processed] - updated November 2010&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*02/11/10: The LSC have refused permission for publication of correspondence clarifying their August 2010 newsletter statement on Level 1/2 fees: 'The only official guidance that can be published is the specification and the principles of MH document'. Further guidance on Level 1/2 fees may be included in an update to the 'Principles' document. You will each need individually to ask the LSC whether or not the newsletter is compatible with the official guidance (it is not: see news item of 7/10/10).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*27/10/10: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_12103.asp?page=1 CLS News: LSC will not appeal the Law Society judicial review judgment]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*20/10/10: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/forms/preview_oct_2010.asp New civil Legal Aid forms] - updated 18/10/10 - These forms are mandatory from 15/11/10 and may not be used before that date. The following have new versions: CLS APP1, 6, 7, 8; CLS MEANS1, 1A, 1B, 1C, 2, 3, 4, &amp;amp; 5; Means Guidance &amp;amp; Checklist (CK3); CLS POA1; CW1, CW1&amp;amp;2 (MH), CW2 (IMM), CW Counsel (MH), CW3A, 3B &amp;amp; 3C; Civil Codes Guidance &amp;amp; Guidance for Reporting Controlled Work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*18/10/10: [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_12060.asp?page=1 CLS News: Important update on civil contracts] - 13/10/10 - Confirmation that all non-family legal aid contracts and family mediation contracts will start on 15/11/10. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*07/10/10: The LSC has resiled from the position in the August 2010 newsletter that Level 2 cannot be claimed on the day of first attendance even where the solicitor makes the Tribunal application on the day or the client has previously made an application. The division between Level 1 and 2 must be clearly evidenced on the file. Permission is currently being obtained from the LSC Policy Team to publish the relevant email here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/newsandevents/news/view=newsarticle.law?NEWSID=430927 Law Society: Q&amp;amp;A: judicial review outcome] - 5/10/10 - Including &amp;quot;11. Will the Law Society now be challenging the LSC's other legal aid tender procedures? We are reviewing the position in respect of the other tenders in the light of the Divisional Court's judgment. However, the issues in the other areas are somewhat different from the position in family legal aid. The key issue for the Divisional Court was the way in which the LSC applied the selection criterion relating to accreditation, and the fact that this arbitrarily and unfairly excluded firms that had not had opportunity to become accredited in order to show that they were in fact as qualified to undertake the work as the winners. Moreover, the court recorded that the number of firms excluded was out of all proportion to the number that was expected by the LSC, and that this drastic reduction in the number of providers was inconsistent with the LSC's strategic aims and statutory duties. This combination of factors was unique to the family tender. The fact that we have succeeded in this one challenge does not therefore mean that we would necessarily do so in other fields.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/UnifiedContractExtensionGuidance.pdf Unified Contract Extension Guidance] - 20/9/10 - This guidance explains the one-month extension to civil legal aid contracts&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_11982.asp?page=1 CLS News: Law Society Judicial Review of family tender] - 6/9/10 - Current contracts will now expire on Sunday 14/11/10; new contracts will commence on 15/11/10; current contact holders will receive an additional 1/12 of their matter start allocation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/Civil_2010_Contracts_Verification_FAQ_v6_1_September_2010.pdf Version 6 of Civil Contract 2010 Verification: Frequently Asked Questions] - 1/9/10 - This version corrects a previously incorrect answer to question 3.2 (I am concerned that I will not be able to deliver all the matter starts that I have been allocated, what should I do?) The answer in version 2 was: &amp;quot;If you are in any doubt as to whether you can deliver all your matter starts, please contact us through the message board and let us know how many you would like. We will then adjust your total. It is important that you receive the right allocation at the start of the contract.&amp;quot; The current answer is: &amp;quot;You will be required to deliver both the volume and breadth of services for which you have successfully tendered and been allocated matter starts in accordance with your bid and ranking (if applicable to your tender). However, as part of the verification process the LSC is giving successful applicants who are concerned that they will not be able to deliver the volume allocated to them an opportunity to review their allocation and request a reduction. Where such requests are received we will consider the implications for the procurement area with a view to reallocating any surplus matter starts to other providers in accordance with the allocation process set out in the IFA.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_11835.asp CLS News: Update on accreditation contribution scheme] - 18/8/10 - From 14/10/10 the LSC will only pay £146.88 towards accreditation and re-accreditation to the Law Society Mental Health panel (these figures are from a document not on the LSC website). The rationale is that this is 50% of the cost.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/Civil_2010_Contracts_Verification_FAQ_v2_23_August_2010.pdf Civil Contract 2010 Verification: Frequently Asked Questions] - published on 23/8/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:LSC newsletter August 2010.pdf|LSC Mental Health Newsletter August 2010]] - 13/8/10 - This Legal Services Commission newsletter contains information under the following headings: (1) Running record of costs; (2) Level 1 rates; (3) Application turnaround; (4) Application for prior authorities. It is stated that &amp;quot;If your client has applied to the Tribunal before your initial attendance, then all work undertaken on the date you first attend with the client is deemed to be level 1 and must be claimed at Legal Help rates&amp;quot; but this is inconsistent with specification paragraphs 12.18-12.20 and Principles document paragraph 2. The small print contains the following gem: &amp;quot;The views expressed in this publication may not be the views of the Legal Services Commission.&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/tendering/mental_health.asp LSC Tendering process news] - 12/8/10 - &amp;quot;The appeals process for Mental Health services for Strategic Health Authorities is now complete. Assessment of tenders for work at High Security Hospitals is ongoing and we will notify applicants of the outcome of this tender week beginning 16 August&amp;quot;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_11779.asp?page=1 CLS News: Financial stewardship visits – guidance published] - 5/8/10 - This is a draft version (marked &amp;quot;version 5&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;first edition&amp;quot; and dated April 2010) of the manual used by &amp;quot;relationship&amp;quot; managers for their &amp;quot;financial stewardship visits&amp;quot;. The areas dealt with are: (1) Obtaining and retaining evidence of means (civil only); (2) Case splitting and duplicate claiming (civil only); (3) Family level 1 and 2 fees; (4) Evaluating publicly-funded WIP (civil only); (5) Management of certificated payments on account; and (6) Validation of tolerance claims. It discusses how visits are organised and potential outcomes, including contract sanctions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*As predicted, a significant number of firms bid for the maximum possible number of matter starts in the expectation that everybody else would do likewise. As there were many more matter starts bid for than were available, everybody got a pro rata reduction. This left many firms who did not overbid with too few matter starts to be economically viable. The following statements have been issued:&lt;br /&gt;
:*[http://www.mhla.co.uk/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=488 MHLA: New contracting regime costs more money - yet threatens representation of the mentally unwell] - 13/7/10&lt;br /&gt;
:*[http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/newsandevents/news/view=newsarticle.law?NEWSID=428914 Law Society: Mental health tender – Law Society concerns] - 15/7/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*On 8/7/10 the LSC published the [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/CategoryDefinitions.pdf 2010 category definitions] and [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/CategoryDefinitionGuidance.pdf related guidance]. See [[#Category definition]] below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/tendering/mental_health.asp LSC News]: On 17/6/10 the LSC published a [http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/100617_Statement_on_MH_Awards_FINALv2.0.pdf statement] on Mental Health contract awards. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Notifications for the award of contracts in mental health law were sent out on 10/6/10 via the Bravo e-tendering message boards. These inform applicants  of the number of Matter Starts awarded to them in each Strategic Health Authority Procurement Area. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/tendering/mental_health.asp LSC Update: Important update on timetable for the mental health tender process] - 28/5/10 - The outcome of the mental health tender process will be announced by 7/6/10 via the E-tendering portal. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*LSC Update: Indicative timetable for Mental Health tender process - 26/4/10 - The results of the tendering process for mental health Legal Aid work (except in special hospitals) was due to be published on 26/4/10 but, because of the expected regime change, will be announced at some stage before the end of May. The extra time will be used to check whether firms are able to deliver the services they have tendered for. See [[#Tender process timetable]] below.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_11374.asp CLS News: Customer satisfaction survey] - 23/4/10 - Help to write the LSC's epitaph&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_11346.asp?page=1 CLS News: Updated CLS financial eligibility keycard now available] - 12/4/10 - To be used for new and further assessments from 12/4/10. The changes in this edition reflect an increase in the standard dependants allowances assessed for a partner or child living with the applicant (based on income support uprating); eligibility limits are unchanged.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_11318.asp CLS News: Important changes to the Funding Code] - 1/4/10 - &amp;quot;The changes affect the criteria for judicial review, multi-party actions and claims against public authorities and set up new appeal  structures for certain high cost and public interest cases.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*See [[Consultations#Ministry of Justice]] (Legal Aid: refocusing on priority cases) for further details&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_11232.asp CLS News: Transfer of civil applications processing from Nottingham to Merseyside] - 16/3/10 - From 1/4/10 all civil application processing will be transferred from Nottingham to the Merseyside regional office&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_11237.asp CLS News: Mental Health tender process update] - 18/3/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/Mental_Health_FAQ_for_publication_17_March_2010_v6_Final.pdf FAQ about mental health invitation to tender, version 6] - 17/3/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/PQQFAQv5_090310.pdf FAQ about pre-qualification questionnaire, version 5] - 9/3/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/Mental_Health_FAQ_for_publication_11_March_2010_v5_Final.pdf FAQ about mental health invitation to tender, version 5] - 11/3/10 &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_11207.asp CLS News: 2010 contracts tender process] - 10/3/10 - The automated email this morning was incorrect: the mental health PQQ deadline is 12 noon on 31/3/10.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_11198.asp?page=1 CLS News: Provider payments in March] - 9/3/10 - Some bills for civil representation, crown court litigation and very high cost case work which should have been paid on the weeks commencing 15, 22 and 29 March may be delayed. Standard Monthly Payments and other payments are unaffected.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:*Response to the above news: [http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/newsandevents/news/view=newsarticle.law?NEWSID=426512 Law Society: Legal aid lawyers pay the price of LSC's mismanagement] - 9/3/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/100308NoticetoamendMentalHealthIFA.pdf Notice to Mental Health Applicant Organisations] - 8/3/10 - Paragraph 7.12 (information about payments on account) of the Information For Applicants has been amended so as to accord with the 2010 Civil Contract.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*Law Society videos explaining [http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/legal-aid-contracts/tendering-process.page the tendering process] and [http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/legal-aid-contracts/contract-terms.page the contract terms] - 4/3/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/Mental_Health_FAQ_for_publication_5_March_2010_v4_Final.pdf FAQ about mental health invitation to tender, version 4] - 5/3/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_11170.asp New schedules for April to October 2010] - 3/3/10 - How matter starts will be allocated to cover the period 1/4/10 to 13/10/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/Mental_Health_FAQ_for_publication_2_March_2010_v1_Final.pdf Updated FAQ about mental health invitation to tender] - 2/3/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/PQQFAQv3_020310.pdf FAQ about pre-qualification questionnaire, version 3] - 2/3/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.justice.gov.uk/news/newsrelease030310d.htm Sir Ian Magee’s review into the delivery of legal aid] - 3/3/10 - Also a press release setting out LSC's move from being a executive non-departmental public body to becoming an executive agency&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/Mental_Health_FAQ_for_publication_25_February_2010_v1_Final.pdf LSC publish FAQs about mental health invitation to tender] -  25/2/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_11092.asp LSC forms become mandatory on 1 April 2010] - 16/2/10&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.lawsociety.org.uk/productsandservices/practicenotes/legalaidcontract/4366.article Law Society Practice Note: Legal Aid contract 2010: Civil, 8/2/10] - Summary of the main changes to the Legal Aid contract 2010 and the tendering process&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_10922.asp?page=1 Mental Health tender process opens shortly, 4/2/10] - Reminder that the tender process, for work from 14/10/10, runs from 10/2/10 for 7 weeks, and the procurement plan has been published&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_10881.asp?page=1 Legal help financial eligibility – advice for providers, 2/2/10] - Advice on means evidence required for audit purposes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmpubacc/322/322.pdf House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts: The procurement of legal aid in England and Wales by the Legal Services Commission: Ninth Report of Session 2009–10] - 2/2/10 - a critical examination of the procurement and administration of legal aid in England and Wales&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[[Media:Lsc mh news jan 2010.pdf|Mental Health Newsletter, 28/1/10]] - The LSC have started posting a newsletter to mental health law firms. The January edition includes confirmation that (1) all contract work and MHA/MCA/related public law licensed work is dealt with by Mental Health Unit in Liverpool, and (2) the new form EC Claim1 became mandatory on 1/11/09. The small print, bizarrely, states that &amp;quot;The views expressed in this publication may not be the views of the Legal Services Commission&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/docs/civil_contracting/Mental_Health_Procurement_Plan.pdf Mental Health Procurement Plan, 22/1/10] - This document shows the Mental Health services the LSC are commissioning and the volume of New Matter Starts (NMS) available in each Strategic Health Authority procurement area and High Security Hospital from October 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_10804.asp?page=1 Changes to the civil legal aid means test 20-01-2010] - From 11/1/10 onwards, a disregard can be made for any monthly payment that the client (or his partner, where applicable) is required to make under a contribution order towards the costs of representation in his criminal case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_10739.asp 2010 civil contract: arrangements for billing of disbursements 22-12-2009] - When the new contract starts in October 2010, mental health firms will be able to apply for interim payments of disbursements (excluding counsel's fees) where six months have elapsed since (a) the start of the matter and (b) any previous interim payment application. Paragraph 9.50 of the MH specification has been amended accordingly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_10701.asp LSC outlines actions following NAO report 17-12-2009] - Following a slating by the National Audit Office, the LSC have written to all firms. Of relevance to mental health law: on audit, in certain circumstances, they had allowed 2 hours' work without evidence of entitlement, but this practice will cease; firms with high numbers of split cases and multiple matter starts for a single client will be investigated with a view to the recovery of cash; and a reminder was given of the general duties of keeping records to justify claims.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_10688.asp?page=1 Civil case management - change in contact details 16-12-2009] - From February 2010, the phone number for all urgent enquiries about civil certificated work is 0300 200 2020; email or post should be used for non-urgent enquiries (legal-enquiries@legalservices.gov.uk for civil legal, finance-enquiries@legalservices.gov.uk for finance, means-enquiries for means queries)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_10575.asp LSC releases update to 'Improving your Quality' guide 23-11-2009] - New edition of ‘Improving your Quality’ guide on mental health&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_10576.asp Mental health work moving to our Merseyside office 23-11-2009] - Work to be transferred from Nottingham at the end of November 2009&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_10511.asp Fixed fee contract compliance audit update, 10-11-2009] - From 1/10/09, any reduction will count towards the total number of files nil assessed. For example, if there are two nil-assessed files, plus one file reduced by 25%, then the overall figure will be 2.25 rather than 2.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_10506.asp?page=1 New ‘Improving your Quality’ generic guide launched 09-11-2009] - On 6/11/09 the LSC published a new generic (not specific to any category of law) &amp;quot;Improving Your Quality&amp;quot; peer review guidance document.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_10465.asp?page=1 Civil bid rounds for 2010 contracts - Q&amp;amp;A available, 29-10-2009] - &amp;quot;All questions submitted by Friday 6 November will be answered in a final version of the Q&amp;amp;A document to be published on Friday 13 November.&amp;quot; Version 10 of the Q&amp;amp;A is dated 30/10/09.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_10433.asp?page=1 Tendering timetable: 2010 civil and crime legal aid contracts, 21-10-2009] - The new civil legal aid contract will come into effect on 1 October 2010. The bid round for non-immigration civil work is planned for the week beginning 8 February 2010, and will be open for seven weeks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*[http://www.legalservices.gov.uk/civil/cls_news_10466.asp?page=1 New matter starts - guidance to firms approaching their contract limit, 20-10-2009] - The LSC are running out of money so will remove matter starts from firms unlikely to use them; if they can afford it these will be reallocated; consideration will be given to modest increases for firms at imminent risk of running out, but generally they will look at &amp;quot;access to services&amp;quot; across the procurement area as a whole as opposed to individual provider level.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Tender process timetable==&lt;br /&gt;
Message dated 28/5/10:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:Important update on timetable for the mental health tender process&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We will notify providers of the outcome of the Mental Health process by 7 June. We are sorry for any inconvenience caused by this change to the timetable, following additional necessary clarifications.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We will inform all applicant organisations of the result of the tender process through the messaging system in the eTendering portal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Message from LSC Policy Team dated 26/4/10:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:The results of the Tender Process for Strategic Health Authority Areas were due to be communicated to Applicant Organisations on 26 April 2010. However, we will not now be able to notify Applicants of the result of the tender process before 6 May 2010. Following the election, we will need to discuss the outcome of the tender process with any new ministers, and it is likely that notification to Applicants will take place shortly after this. We hope to be able to notify Applicants of our initial decisions before the end of May, thereby giving them over 4 months’ notice before the new contract starts. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We will inform all Applicant Organisations of the result of the tender process through the messaging system in the eTendering portal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
:We will be using some of this additional time to carry out due diligence checks to confirm whether Applicant Organisations are in a position to deliver the services they have tendered for.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Legal Aid]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Jonathan</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>
