Fennell, Letts and Wilson, Mental Health Tribunals (Law Society 2013):
Foreword | Review | Amazon | Law Society bookshop | 20% discount

Email updates | Email discussion list | Twitter
CPD scheme (12 points for £60) | Books | Jobs | Events

Re C (Mental Patient: Habeas Corpus) (2002) EWHC 243 (Admin)

From Mental Health Law Online

Jump to: navigation, search

The application for the issue of a writ of habeas corpus was premature and without any prospect of success; the proper course was to judicially review the Tribunal decision


C was detained under s37/41. The MHRT declined to discharge, favouring one psychiatrist's evidence over another. C applied for the issue of a writ of habeas corpus.

Held: Unless the Tribunal's decision is successfully challenged by way of judicial review, there is no basis for the court to form even a provisional view that Mr C may be unlawfully detained. The application for habeas corpus is at the very least premature and, on the basis of the present material, is without any prospect of success.

External link