R (P) v MHRT East Midlands and North East Region (2002) EWCA Civ 260
From Mental Health Law Online
Permission to appeal granted on the basis that onus of proof had arguably been placed on the patient; permission to argue that the definition of psychopathic disorder requires the current commission by the patient of either abnormally aggressive conduct or seriously irresponsible conduct.
Related case
See R (P) v MHRT East Midlands and North East Region (2002) EWCA Civ 697.