MHLO Annual Review 2013: Paperback | Kindle

Email updates | Email discussion list | Twitter

Fennell, Letts and Wilson, Mental Health Tribunals (Law Society 2013):
Foreword | Review | Amazon | Law Society bookshop | 20% discount

CPD scheme (12 points for £60)




R (P) v MHRT East Midlands and North East Region (2002) EWCA Civ 260

From Mental Health Law Online

Jump to: navigation, search

Permission to appeal granted on the basis that onus of proof had arguably been placed on the patient; permission to argue that the definition of psychopathic disorder requires the current commission by the patient of either abnormally aggressive conduct or seriously irresponsible conduct.

Related case

See R (P) v MHRT East Midlands and North East Region (2002) EWCA Civ 697.

Resources

Bailii