R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC and Sutton LBC (2010) EWHC 562 (Admin)

From Mental Health Law Online

Jump to: navigation, search

M moved from Hammersmith to a hostel in Sutton, but Hammersmith continued to pay; he was subsequently placed under s3 in a Sutton hospital and surrendered his tenancy; as he was resident in Sutton when admitted, Hammersmith was not responsible for future accommodation costs under s117. [Summary required.]

Related judgments

R (Hertfordshire CC) v LB Hammersmith and Fulham (2011) EWCA Civ 77

  • R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC and Sutton LBC (2010) EWHC 562 (Admin)

Citations

(2010) 116 BMLR 46

Case no CO/126/2009, CO/3390/2009

External links

Bailii

Community Care: Court ruling may increase adult care costs for councils - 8/3/10