Mental Health Law Online is now six years old - please join the new discussion list



R (H) v MHRT (2000) EWHC 646 (Admin)

From Mental Health Law Online

Jump to: navigation, search

The MHRT should not have informed the nearest relative of restricted patient [or, more correctly, the person who would have been the nearest relative had the patient not been restricted] of the forthcoming hearing, because the definition of "nearest relative" in the Tribunal rules excluded restricted patients; the injunction preventing the Tribunal from disclosing its final decision would continue.

External link

Bailii