R (G) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (2004) EWHC 2193 (Admin)

From Mental Health Law Online

Jump to: navigation, search

The Tribunal were right to conclude that the conditions which the claimant patient contended for (continued residence at Thornford Park) would be a deprivation, rather than a restriction, of his liberty. The patient's consent to this continuing deprivation of liberty would not confer jurisdiction on the Tribunal.'

External links

Bailii - full text