R (G) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (2004) EWHC 2193 (Admin)
From Mental Health Law Online
The Tribunal were right to conclude that the conditions which the claimant patient contended for (continued residence at Thornford Park) would be a deprivation, rather than a restriction, of his liberty. The patient's consent to this continuing deprivation of liberty would not confer jurisdiction on the Tribunal.'
External links
Bailii - full text