LV v UK 50718/16 [2019] MHLO 32 (ECHR)

MHT/Parole Board delay LV, a s47/49 patient, had argued that there had been a delay, in breach of Article 5(4), in securing her release, in particular because of the two-stage process involving both the Mental Health Tribunal and Parole Board. She accepted the government's offer of £2,500 in settlement of her claim.

External links

• HUDOC website (full text)

CASES DATABASE

Full judgment: No Bailii link (neutral citation is unknown or not applicable)

Subject(s):

• Deprivation of liberty🔍

Date: 6/6/19🔍

Court: European Court of Human Rights🔍

Judicial history:

• LV v UK 50718/16 [2019] MHLO 32 (ECHR)
• LV v UK 50718/16 [2018] MHLO 22
• R v LV; R (LV) v SSJ [2015] EWCA Crim 45, [2015] EWCA Civ 56
• R (LV) v SSJ [2014] EWHC 1495 (Admin)
• R (LV) v SSJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1086
• R (LV) v SSJ [2012] EWHC 3899 (Admin)

Judge(s):

• Ales Pejchal🔍
• Tim Eicke🔍
• Raffaele Sabato🔍

Parties:

• LV🔍
• United Kingdom🔍

Citation number(s):

• [2019] MHLO 32 (ECHR)

What links here:

• Parole Board
• The ECHR and mental health law
• R (LV) v SSJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1086
• R (LV) v SSJ [2014] EWHC 1495 (Admin)
• R v LV; R (LV) v SSJ [2015] EWCA Crim 45, [2015] EWCA Civ 56
• LV v UK 50718/16 [2018] MHLO 22
• R (LV) v SSJ [2012] EWHC 3899 (Admin)
• Jonathan Wilson, 'Mental health: update' (Legal Action, March 2020)

Published: 17/6/19 13:00

Cached: 2024-04-19 05:39:09